排序方式： 共有138条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
91.
92.
目的观察贴扎对慢性踝关节不稳的男性篮球运动员正向和侧向跳跃时踝关节运动学特征的影响。方法采用Vicon三维运动捕捉系统和Kistler三维测力台采集29例慢性踝关节不稳的男性篮球二级运动员贴扎与未贴扎条件下的正向和侧向跳跃落地数据, 包括受试者未贴扎和贴扎条件下正向跳跃落地动作和侧向跳跃落地动作踝关节触地(TD)前200 ms、TD前150 ms、TD前100 ms、TD前50 ms、TD时、TD后50 ms、TD后100 ms、TD后150 ms和TD后200 ms的背屈/跖屈角度、外翻/内翻角度和外旋/内旋角度, 以及背屈/跖屈角速度、外翻/内翻角速度、外旋/内旋角速度。采用Visual 3D三维运动分析软件对所得数据进行建模计算, 并采用SPSS 25.0版统计学软件对本研究所得数据进行分析。结果正向跳跃落地, 受试者贴扎后TD前50 ms和TD的踝关节跖屈角度较未贴扎时分别减少了3.27°和2.70°, TD前50 ms的踝关节内翻角度较未贴扎时减少了2.13°, TD前200 ms和TD前150 ms的踝关节外旋角度较未贴扎时分别减少了2.59°和2.17°, TD后100 ... 相似文献
93.
目的：总结肌内效贴(KT)作为单一治疗方式或辅助其他治疗在前交叉韧带重建术后的应用。方法：检索建库至2022年6月27日的PubMed、Web of Science、Science direct、Embase、The Cochrane Library、VIP Data、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据等数据库中肌内效贴在前交叉韧带重建术后治疗效果的文献。采用Scoping综述方法提取文献内容。结果：共检索到332篇相关文献,最终纳入2013年到2022年来自6个国家的10篇文献。ACLR的身体结构和功能障碍主要涉及术后疼痛、肿胀、活动度、大腿围度及功能表现。评价工具包括：疼痛指标如VAS、NRS、Laitinen量表、WHO疼痛程度分级;活动度评估工具如量角器;肌力评估工具如等速肌力测试、Baseline手持测力计;肢体围度测量双侧大腿周径;功能评价工具如：Lysholm评分、改良Cincinnati评分、Tampa评定量表(TSK)、星移平衡测试(YBT)、单腿跳跃测试、10码下肢功能测试和Tegner-Lysholm膝关节量表等。贴扎方法以Y形,I形和爪形为主,使用不同贴扎方法联合贴扎。结论：肌内效贴干预前交叉韧带重建术后的疼痛肿胀、肌肉力量及功能恢复等问题是当前的研究热点。未来需要进一步探讨贴扎介入时机、持续时间、贴扎方法、拉力大小等问题,为基于循证医学推广肌内效贴技术提供更充分的理论依据。 相似文献
94.
95.
96.
目的 观察肌内效贴对脑卒中后流涎的治疗效果。方法 2019年10月至2021年1月,脑卒中后吞咽障碍流涎患者40例随机分为对照组和试验组,各20例。两组均接受常规药物治疗、吞咽常规训练和吞咽困难康复护理,试验组加用肌内效贴,共3周。治疗前后采用功能性经口摄食评估量表(FOIS)、洼田饮水试验(WST)和教师流涎量表(TDS)进行评定。结果 试验组脱落1例。治疗后,两组FOIS、TDS和WST评分均改善(|Z| > 2.000, P < 0.05),试验组均明显优于对照组(|Z| > 3.045, P < 0.01)。结论 配合肌内效贴可进一步改善脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者的流涎。 相似文献
97.
Leonid Kalichman Inbar Levin Itzhak Bachar Elisha Vered 《Journal of bodywork and movement therapies》2018,22(3):700-706
Background
Kinesio taping is a possible therapeutic modality for myofascial pain, nevertheless, very scarce research has been performed on this subject.Objective
To evaluate the immediate and short-term effect of kinesio taping application on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in the upper trapezius and gastrocnemius muscles.Methods
Two randomized, single-blinded, controlled trials were simultaneously executed on the upper trapezius and gastrocnemius muscles. Different participants in each study were randomly assigned to an active intervention (N = 15) or control (N = 15) group. Kinesio taping was applied on the gastrocnemius or upper trapezius muscles by positioning three “I” strips in a star shape (tension on base) directly above the MTrPs in the active intervention group and a few centimeters away from the MTrPs in the controls.Results
The second evaluation on both sides showed lower PPT values than the first evaluation in the control group, denoting that the spots were more sensitive. The third evaluation showed even lower values. The active intervention group showed a contralateral side pattern similar to the controls. However, on the side of the kinesio taping application, the PPT values of the second evaluation were higher (the spots were less sensitive) and after 24 h returned to the original values. The difference between the PPT measurements on the MTrPs’ side of the active intervention group vs. the controls (time-group interaction) was significant (F (2,56) = 3.24, p = 0.047).Conclusions
We demonstrated that a kinesio taping application positioned directly above the MTrPs may prevent an increase in sensitivity (decrease in PPT) immediately after application and prevent further sensitization up to 24 h later. The fact that two different muscles were similarly affected by the kinesio taping application, confirmed that the results were not in error. Further studies are needed to directly test the effect of a kinesio taping application on post-treatment soreness. 相似文献98.
The effect of Kinesio Taping on postural control in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain
Soheila Abbasi Zahra Rojhani-Shirazi Esmaeil Shokri Francisco García-Muro San José 《Journal of bodywork and movement therapies》2018,22(2):487-492
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate the possible alterations in postural control during upright standing in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain and the effect of Kinesio taping on the postural control.Methods
Twenty subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain and twenty healthy subjects participated in this study. The center of pressure excursion was evaluated before the intervention for both groups, and immediately after intervention for the low back pain group. Independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney test and repeated measure ANOVA were used for the statistical analysis of the data.Results
There were significant differences in the center of pressure excursion between the low back pain group versus the healthy group. The results of the ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the mean COP displacement and velocity before Kinesio Taping, immediately after, and 24 h after in the low back pain group.Conclusions
There are poor postural control mechanisms in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain. Kinesio taping seems to change postural control immediately and have lasting effects until the day after. 相似文献99.
Fahimeh Kamali Ehsan Sinaei Elham Taherkhani 《Journal of bodywork and movement therapies》2018,22(2):540-545
Objectives
Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a prevalent problem among athletes that can cause long-lasting disability and time lost from sporting activities. Thus far, a variety of methods have been suggested to address this problem, including spinal manipulation (SM) and Kinesio Tape® (KT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding KT to SM can provide any extra effect in athletes with CNLBP or not.Method
Forty-two athletes (21males, 21females) with CNLBP were randomized into two groups of SM (n = 21) and SM plus KT (n = 21). Pain intensity, functional disability level and trunk flexor-extensor muscles endurance were assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry pain and disability index (ODI), McQuade test, and unsupported trunk holding test, respectively. The tests were done before and immediately, one day, one week, and one month after the interventions and compared between the two groups.Results
After treatments, pain intensity and disability level decreased and endurance of trunk flexor-extensor muscles increased significantly in both groups. Repeated measures analysis, however, showed that there was no significant difference between the groups in any of the evaluations.Conclusions
The findings of the present study showed that adding KT to SM does not appear to have a significant extra effect on pain, disability and muscle endurance in athletes with CNLBP. However, more studies are needed to examine the therapeutic effects of KT in treating these patients.Clinical trial registry number (irct.ir)
IRCT2016020624149N5. 相似文献100.
目的探讨肌内效贴扎对青年女性膝关节肌力的影响。方法 20名健康女大学生,用等速测试仪,以60°/s角速度,测量无贴扎、肌内效贴扎、安慰贴扎3种状态下的膝关节屈伸向心性收缩及离心性收缩相对峰力矩;用表面肌电图测试股内侧肌、股直肌、股外侧肌的肌电振幅均方根值(RMS)。结果向心性收缩时,肌内效贴扎时伸肌相对峰力矩明显高于无贴扎、安慰贴扎时(P0.01),屈肌相对峰力矩3种状态下无显著性差异(P0.05);股内侧肌在肌内效贴扎时RMS标化值明显低于未贴扎时(P0.01);股外侧肌肌内效贴扎时RMS标化值明显低于未贴扎时、安慰贴扎时(P0.01);股直肌RMS标化值3种状态下无显著性差异(P0.05)。离心性收缩时,肌内效贴扎时伸肌、屈肌相对峰力矩均明显高于无贴扎、安慰贴扎时(P0.01);股内侧肌、股外侧肌在肌内效贴扎时RMS标化值低于未贴扎时(P0.01);股直肌RMS标化值3种状态下无显著性差异(P0.05)。结论肌内效贴扎可以提高股四头肌向心性、离心性收缩肌力,增加腘绳肌离心性收缩肌力,提高股内侧肌及股外侧肌的肌纤维募集能力。 相似文献