雷替曲塞用于腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中腹腔灌注化疗的安全性分析

目的探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中雷替曲塞用于腹腔灌注化疗的安全性。方法从我院2017年5月～2018年5月选取58例行腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的结直肠癌患者,将患者随机分成两组,每组29例。对照组采用常规手术方式,观察组采用术中雷替曲塞腹腔灌注化疗的方式。观察比较两组患者的相关毒性指标和不良反应发生情况。结果观察组患者治疗后白细胞计数(WBC)、红细胞计数(RBC)、血肌酐(Cr)、血小板计数(PLT)、尿素氮(BUN)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)指标与对照组无显著差异(P0.05),观察组不良反应发生率为31.03%,相比对照组不良反应发生率为37.93%,两组数据差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中雷替曲塞用于腹腔灌注化疗,不会增加患者的毒副作用和不良反应,具有较好的安全性。     

基于单片机的全自动腹腔灌注热化疗仪的系统设计

针对腹腔肿瘤提出的一种热疗与化疗复合治疗的新方法。本文设计了这套智能型全自动腹腔灌注热化疗设备。利用加热炉丝加热化疗药物,通过恒流泵将药液送入人体腹腔,从腹腔流出的药液废弃掉。系统采用单片机对加热温度及流速进行控制,以使腹腔内化疗药液温度恒定在最佳温度值附近。     

胸腔热灌注治疗中应用右美托咪定复合地佐辛的临床观察

目的观察胸腔热灌注治疗中应用右美托咪定复合地佐辛的临床效果。方法以2013年1月至10月本院收治的全麻下行胸腔热灌注治疗的患者40例为研究对象,按随机数字表分为右美托咪定＋芬太尼组（A组）和右美托咪定＋地佐辛组（B组）,分别于术前10min给予芬太尼1．0μg/kg、地佐辛0．1mg／kg,术中均静脉持续泵注右美托咪定。记录两组患者治疗开始后5min（T1）、15min（T2）、30min（T3）、60min（T4）4个时点的视觉模拟评分（VAS）及T3、T4时点的Ramsay镇静评分,记录术中不良反应的发生情况。结果术中各时点两组患者的VAS评分差异无统计学意义（均P〉0．05）。T3、T4时点,B组患者的镇静评分明显高于A组（2．45±0．61比1．50±0．55,2．78±0．75比2．45±0．92,均P〈0．05）。与A组比较,B组患者不良反应发生较少。结论右美托咪定复合地佐辛用于胸腔热灌注治疗术中镇静镇痛,效果确切,不良反应较少。     

Progression of peritoneal adenomucinosis to the scrotum: a rare occurrence treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic chemoperfusion of the scrotum in two patients.

Introduction:

Disseminated Peritoneal Adenomucinosis (DPAM) is an infrequent presentation of appendiceal cancer. Infrequently, umbilical or inguinal hernias could be the first clinical manifestation of this condition; DPAM extension to the scrotum may be anatomically viable. Treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard of treatment for DPAM. We hypothesize that these same treatment principles, consisting of CRS with hyperthermic chemoperfusion of the scrotum (HCS), could be applied to the scrotal dissemination of DPAM.

Methods:

We reviewed our Institution''s prospective cancer database and identified two cases of DPAM with extension to the scrotum. Their medical records were examined, and close follow-up was performed. Tumor histopathology and cytoreduction scores were evaluated. Tumor progression was monitored on follow-up by physical examination, tumor markers (CEA, CA 125, CA 19.9) and abdomino-pelvic CT scan.

Results:

Two patients who previously had CRS/ HIPEC for DPAM were successfully treated with HSC. Both patients are alive and free of disease at 88 and 57 months following initial CRS/HIPEC, and 50 and 32 months following CRS/HCS, respectively.

Conclusion:

Increased awareness by surgeons to the coexistence of inguinal hernia with peritoneal neoplasm and the need for a surgical repair is raised. CRS/HCS may be employed to treat patients with DPAM extension to the scrotum. Successful outcome is dependent on complete cytoreduction of metastatic tumor.     

A comparison of primary intraperitoneal chemotherapy to consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally resected advanced ovarian cancer

Objective

To compare survival outcomes for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received primary intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy to those who received IV followed by consolidation (treatment given to patients in remission) IP chemotherapy.

Methods

Data were analyzed and compared for all patients with stage III–IV EOC who underwent optimal primary cytoreduction (residual disease ≤ 1 cm) followed by cisplatin-based consolidation IP chemotherapy (1/2001–12/2005) or primary IV/IP chemotherapy (1/2005–7/2011).

Results

We identified 224 patients; 62 (28%) received IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy and 162 (72%) received primary IV/IP chemotherapy. The primary IP group had significantly more patients with serous tumors. The consolidation IP group had a significantly greater median preoperative platelet count, CA-125, and amount of ascites. There were no differences in residual disease at the end of cytoreduction between both groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was greater for the primary IP group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (23.7 months vs 19.7 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57–1.06; p = 0.11). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly greater for the primary IP group (78.8 months vs 57.5 months; HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.83; p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, the difference in PFS was not significant (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56–1.11; p = 0.17), while the difference in OS remained significant (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.89; p = 0.01).

Conclusions

In our study, primary IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared to IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy in patients with optimally cytoreduced advanced EOC.     

高精度持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗联合静脉化疗治疗卵巢癌的临床研究

目的：观察高精度持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗（IPHC）联合静脉化疗治疗卵巢癌的临床疗效。方法：分析2011—2012年就诊于郑州大学人民医院50例行满意的卵巢癌减灭术患者,随机分为2组。灌注组28例,行高精度持续循环IPHC联合静脉化疗;对照组22例,行“紫杉醇脂质体135 mg/m2+奥沙利铂135 mg/m2”方案（PT方案）静脉化疗,观察2组患者的临床治疗效果。结果：2组患者术后1个月、3个月血清CA125降至正常比例比较差异有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。2组患者术后1个月、3个月腹水治疗有效率比较差异有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。需要对症处理的化疗后Ⅱ级毒副反应灌注组低于对照组（χ2=7.417,P=0.006）。生活质量改善率灌注组高于对照组（χ2=5.936,P=0.015）。结论：高精度持续循环IPHC联合静脉化疗能够提高卵巢癌的临床疗效,有效地控制卵巢癌恶性腹水,降低严重的化疗毒副反应的发生率,改善生活质量。     

高精度持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗联合静脉化疗治疗卵巢浆液性囊腺癌的临床研究

目的:探讨高精度持续循环腹腔热灌注化疗(CHPPC)联合静脉化疗(IC)对卵巢浆液性囊腺癌满意肿瘤细胞减灭术后患者的疗效及毒副作用。方法:将60例卵巢浆液性囊腺癌满意肿瘤细胞减灭术后患者随机分为实验组和对照组(每组30例),实验组给予CHPPC+IC,对照组给予IC。结果:实验组和对照组中血清CA125半衰期20天者分别占76.67%、43.33%,差异显著(P0.05)。按PECIST指南推荐的实体瘤评价标准,实验组和对照组的有效率分别为80.00%和53.33%,差异显著(P0.05)。实验组和对照组的胃肠道反应发生率分别为96.67%和80.00%,差异显著(P0.05),余不良反应均无显著差异。随访15个月,实验组和对照组的复发率分别为13.33%和36.67%,生存率分别为90.0%和70.0%,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:CHPPC+IC治疗卵巢浆液性囊腺癌安全、可行、可耐受,能显著提高生存率、减少复发率。     

Mobile caecum as a content in recurrent incisional hernia an incidental finding: A rare case report

IntroductionRecurrence in ventral hernia after laparoscopic repair is less as compared to conventional approach. Mobile caecum as a content of ventral hernia is a very rare entity. Standard treatment for mobile cecum is caecopexy using lateral peritoneal flap.Case reportA 40-year-old obese female, homemaker by occupation with a history of incisional hernia 2 year back and treated with intraperitoneal on lay mesh repair presented with swelling in the left lower abdomen for past 6 months. Radiological investigations revealed defect in left lower anterior abdominal wall with protruding bowel loops. Urgent exploratory Laparotomy revealed mobile segment of ileocecal junction in the hernial sac cavity. Caecopexy for the mobile caecum was done.DiscussionMobile caecum is due to embryological failure of fusion of right colonic mesentery with lateral peritoneal wall. Pre-operative diagnosis of mobile caecum is difficult to establish unless it presents as caecal volvulus Caecopexy using the lateral peritoneal flap is the standard of care.ConclusionMobile caecum can surprise the attending surgeon as a content of ventral hernia. Caecopexy using lateral peritoneal flap is the treatment of choice in all with a mobile caecum.     

胃癌腹膜转移病人腹腔化疗港并发症发生及危险因素分析

目的:分析腹腔化疗港并发症发生及相关危险因素.方法:回顾性分析我院323例放置腹腔化疗港病人的临床资料,纳人261例胃癌腹膜转移病人.分析腹腔化疗港在胃癌腹膜转移病人腹腔化疗时发生的并发症及其危险因素.结果:261例中59例(22.6％)发生化疗港相关并发症.其中,皮下积液(25例,42.4％)和化疗港感染(16例,2...