通络胶囊治疗偏头痛的临床与实验研究

认为正气不足、病理体质为偏头痛的发病基础 ,以气血失调为主 ,寒热虚实错杂是本病的基本病机。据此确立扶正固本、祛风活络、化瘀止痛的治疗原则 ,拟通络胶囊治疗偏头痛 30例 ,与太极通天液治疗 30例对照 ,结果表明 ,治疗组愈显率 83.33% ,总有效率 93.33% ,与对照组相比有显著性差别 (P<0 .0 1) ,在改善兼症方面亦优于对照组 (P<0 .0 5或 P<0 .0 1) ,并能改善患者颅内血管功能状态。动物实验表明 ,通络胶囊能提高实验动物痛阈 ,同时提高大鼠下丘脑 5 - HT及 β-内啡呔水平 ,并能改善大鼠软脑膜微循环。     

细胞因子在清肝化瘀汤治疗慢性粒细胞性白血病中的研究

目的观察中药清肝化瘀汤治疗慢性粒细胞性白血病(慢性期)的疗效,并探讨细胞因子水平变化的意义。方法收集45例慢性粒细胞性白血病慢性期患者(治疗组),用清肝化瘀汤治疗,观察患者的临床疗效、细胞因子水平。另用20名正常人作为对照(对照组)。结果治疗组完全缓解率40％,部分缓解率46.7％,总有效率86.7％。治疗组细胞因子水平中白介素2、可溶性白介素2受体、肿瘤坏死因子a治疗前后有显著差异(P<0.05);干扰素γ水平变化无显著差异。且与正常对照组比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论清肝化瘀汤有清热泻肝解毒、活血化瘀消癥的功效,研究结果显示,该药对慢性粒细胞性白血病慢性期(肝热血瘀型)疗效确切,其作用机理可能与改善细胞因子水平有关。     

Nerve Conduction Studies in Surgical Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Patients

Background: Electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) serve a prominent role in the diagnostic workup of cubital tunnel syndrome (CBTS), but their reported sensitivity varies widely. The goals of our study were to determine the sensitivity of EDX in a cohort of patients who responded well to surgical cubital tunnel release (CBTR), and whether the implementation of the Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) criteria improves the sensitivity. Methods: We identified 118 elbows with clinical CBTS who had preoperative EDX and underwent CBTR. The EDX diagnoses were CBTS, ulnar neuropathy (UN), and normal ulnar nerves. We divided the 118 elbows into those that received above-elbow stimulation (XE group) and those that did not (non-XE group). We calculated the sensitivities for all groups and reinterpreted the results according to the AANEM guidelines. Results: Cubital tunnel release provided significant relief in 93.6% of the elbows. Based on the EDX reports, 11% patients had clear CBTS, 23% had UN, and 66% showed no UN. The sensitivities were 11.7% for CBTS and 34.2% for any UN. In the XE group, the sensitivity of the EDX reports for CBTS and UN climbed to 33.3% and 58.3%, respectively. When we calculated the across-elbow motor nerve conduction velocity, the sensitivity for CBTS and UN was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The XE and non-XE groups showed no difference except for sex, bilaterality, concomitant carpal tunnel release, and obesity (P < .05). Conclusion: Implementing AANEM guidelines results in significant improvement in correlation of clinical and electrodiagnostic findings of CBTS.     

The effects of bright light treatment on subjective and objective sleepiness during three consecutive night shifts among hospital nurses – a counter-balanced placebo-controlled crossover study

Objectives:The objective was to investigate effects of timed bright light treatment on subjective and objective measures of sleepiness during three consecutive night shifts among hospital nurses.Methods:Thirty-five nurses were exposed to bright light (10,000 lux) and red dim light (100 lux) during three consecutive night shifts in a counter-balanced crossover trial lasting nine days, which included three days before and three days after the three night shifts. Light exposure for 30 minutes was scheduled between 02:00–03:00 hours on night 1, and thereafter delayed by one hour per night in order to delay the circadian rhythm. Subjective sleepiness was measured daily (heavy eyelids, reduced performance) and every second hour while awake (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, KSS). Objective sleepiness (Psychomotor Vigilance Task, PVT) was measured at 05:00 hours during each night shift. Beyond nocturnal light exposure on the night shifts, no behavioral restrictions or recommendations were given at or off work.Results:Bright light treatment significantly reduced heavy eyelids during night shifts. However, results on KSS and PVT were unaffected by bright light. There were no differences in subjective sleepiness during the three days following the night shifts.Conclusions:This bright light treatment protocol did not convincingly reduce sleepiness among nurses during three consecutive night shifts. Nor did bright light impede the readaptation back to a day-oriented rhythm following the night shift period. Too few consecutive night shifts, inappropriate timing of light, and possible use of other countermeasures are among the explanations for the limited effects of bright light in the present study.