SKY椎体后凸成形术与PVP对骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折责任椎体选择性治疗的比较

目的探讨SKY椎体后凸成形术与PVP对骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折责任椎体选择性治疗的疗效对比,评价治疗骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折责任椎体的有效方法。方法分别于术前、术后2周、术后6月、18个月进行疼痛强度视觉类比评分,观察患者的疼痛症状及生活治疗改善程度。结果 52例手术均成功完成,每个椎体的骨水泥灌注量为3-6mL。两组手术方法术前、术后VAS评分P值分别<0.05,余比较不具统计学意义,两组手术方法术前、术后SF-36评分P值分别<0.05,余比较不具统计学意义。结论无论是SKY椎体后凸成形术或PVP对骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折选择性治疗均可取得良好的效果,相比PVP,SKY椎体后凸成形术更具优势,但价格昂贵,限制了它的使用。     

Comparison of nighttime and daytime operation on outcomes of supracondylar humeral fractures: A prospective observational study

Supracondylar humeral fractures are seen in children and treatment is usually closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). This surgery can be performed at night, depending on its urgency. Fatigue and sleep deprivation can impact performance of doctors during night shifts. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between night shifts postoperative morbidity and mortality of supracondylar fracture operations compared to daytime procedures.This prospective observational study included 94 patients who were aged 5 to 12 years with ASA I to III who had supracondylar humeral fractures, underwent CRPP under general anesthesia. Patients were stratified by the time of surgery using time of induction of anesthesia as the starting time of the procedure, into 2 groups: day (07:30 am–06:29 pm) and night (06:30 pm–07:29 am). In total, 82 patients completed the study: 43 in Group Day and 39 in Group Night.The operation duration in Group Night (114.66 ± 29.46 minutes) was significantly longer than in Group Day (84.32 ± 25.9 minutes) (P = .0001). Operation duration (OR: 0.007; P = .0001) and morbidities (OR: 0.417; P = .035) were independent risk factors in Group Night.Children who had supracondylar humeral fractures, undergoing urgent CRPP surgery, in-hospital mortality was associated with the time of day at which the procedure was performed. Patient safety is critically important for pediatric traumatic patient population. Therefore, we suggested to increase the number of healthcare workers and improve the education and experience of young doctors during night shifts.     

Displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with ORIF via the deltoid interfascicular approach vs the deltopectoral approach: A prospective case-control study

Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of displaced proximal humeral fractures treated with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate fixation via a deltoid interfascicular (DI) vs a deltopectoral (DP) approach.Methods:This prospective case-control study was conducted with patients admitted to our hospital from May 2015 to June 2018 who suffered from unilateral displaced proximal humerus fractures. Patients were treated with PHILOS plate fixation via a DI (DI group) or DP approach (DP group). The clinical outcomes and complication data were collected for comparison between the 2 groups. The patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months; and every 6 months thereafter. The patients’ functional recoveries were evaluated according to the normalized Constant-Murley score, range of motion of the shoulder (flexion, abduction, external/internal rotation) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.Results:A total of 77 patients, followed for an average of 15 ± 2.2months (range, 12–21), were enrolled (36 in DI group and 41 in DP group) for final analysis. No significant differences in age, sex, affected side, fracture type, injury mechanism or time from injury to operation were found between the 2 groups (all P > .05). The incision length, intra-operative blood loss, and duration of operation in the DI group were significantly less than those in the DP group, respectively (all P < .05). The functional outcomes assessed by the normalized Constant-Murley score and range of motion of flexion and internal rotation in the DI group were superior to those in the DP group at 3 and 6months after the operation (P < .05); however, no significant differences were observed at the 12-month and subsequent follow-ups (all P > .05). There was no significant difference in the range of shoulder external rotation and abduction during the postoperative follow-ups (P > .05). At the last follow-up, the mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score was 14.0 (6.6) points in the DI group and 14.4 (6.9) points in the DP group (P = .793). Complications occurred in 1 patient in the DI group and 8 patients in the DP group (P = .049).Conclusion:The current study demonstrates that DI approach is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment displaced proximal humerus fractures. The DI approach rather than DP approach was recommended when lateral and posterior exposure of the proximal humerus is required, especially when fixed with PHILOS plate.     

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Current Controversies for Treatment of Meniscus Root Tears

Purpose of ReviewThe role of the meniscus in preserving the biomechanical function of the knee joint has been clearly defined. The hypothesis that meniscus root integrity is a prerequisite for meniscus function is supported by the development of progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA) following meniscus root tears (MRTs) treated either non-operatively or with meniscectomy. Consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the diagnosis and treatment of MRTs. This review examines the contemporary literature surrounding the natural history, clinical presentation, evaluation, preferred surgical repair technique and outcomes.Recent FindingsSurgeons must have a high index of suspicion in order to diagnose a MRT because of the nonspecific clinical presentation and difficult visualization on imaging. Compared with medial MRTs that commonly occur in middle age/older patients, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger males with lower BMIs, less cartilage degeneration, and with concomitant ligament injury. Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee have been found to be associated with both MRTs and following arthroscopic procedures. Meniscus root repair has demonstrated good outcomes, and acute injuries with intact cartilage should be repaired. Cartilage degeneration, BMI, and malalignment are important considerations when choosing surgical candidates. Meniscus centralization has emerged as a viable adjunct strategy aimed at correcting meniscus extrusion.SummaryMeniscus root repair results in a decreased rate of OA and arthroplasty and is economically advantageous when compared with nonoperative treatment and partial meniscectomy. The transtibial pull-through technique with the addition of centralization for the medial meniscus is associated with encouraging early results.     

多味药多穴位贴敷在治疗胸腰椎骨折术后便秘中的应用效果研究

目的:观察多味药多穴位贴敷治疗胸腰椎骨折病人术后便秘的效果。方法:选择2020年7月—2021年6月在郑州市骨科医院治疗的胸腰椎骨折病人92例。采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各46例,对照组采用常规护理措施,观察组在常规护理基础上将多味药穴位贴敷贴于神阙穴、天枢穴、气海穴,疗程1周;评价两组病人治疗前后便秘症状和生活质量。结果:治疗后观察组病人便秘症状积分、便秘病人生活质量量表(PAC-QOL)总分及各维度得分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:多味药多穴位贴敷可以有效治疗胸腰椎骨折术后便秘,缓解病人的不适症状,改善负性情绪,提升病人的生活质量。     

交锁髓内钉与解剖锁定钢板固定术治疗股骨中下段骨折对膝关节功能的影响

目的 比较解剖锁定钢板(LCP)和交锁髓内钉(RIIN)两种手术方法的治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析我院2011年8月至2014年6月收治的82例股骨中下段骨折患者的临床资料,其中,40例患者采用交锁髓内钉内固定术,为RIIN组,另42例患者采用解剖锁定钢板内固定术,记为LCP组,比较两组患者的临床疗效.结果 治疗后,RIIN组患者的优良率为97.50％,明显高于LCP组的83.33％,且RIIN组的住院天数、手术时间、术中出血量以及愈合时间等指标分别为(9.2±1.5)天、(90.8±10.3)min、(350.3 ±45.1) ml、(3.0±1.5)月,与LCP组[(10.0±2.1)d、(100.5±20.1) min、(500.2±30.2)ml、(4.5±2.0)]月比较显著较低(P＜0.05),两组间差异均具有统计学意义.结论 与解剖锁定钢板相比,交锁髓内钉治疗股骨中下段骨折,其创伤更小,手术切口更短,术后修复更快,且骨折愈合更佳,患者可进行早期功能锻炼,从而有效降低了患者术后膝关节功能障碍,有利于患者的预后恢复,值得临床应用.     

椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎骨折

目的探讨胸腰骨折椎弓根螺钉内固定系统手术的治疗.方法应用短节段C-D椎弓根螺钉内固定系统治疗胸腰椎骨折15例,比较手术前后椎体高度和神经功能变化.结果术后椎体高度恢复,神经功能按Frankel分级标准,较术前改善二级以上.结论短节段C-D椎弓根螺钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折是一种有效方法.     

经皮插入锁定加压钢板微创治疗胫骨中下段骨折(附16例报告)

目的探讨应用锁定加压钢板结合经皮微创钢板固定技术治疗胫骨中下段骨折的方法和疗效。方法2010年5月～2013年6月我院收治16例胫骨中下段闭合性骨折,均采用闭合复位经皮插入锁定加压钢板内固定微创治疗,术后早期无负重功能锻炼,6～8周后部分负重。术后定期门诊摄X线片随访,观察骨折愈合和踝关节功能恢复情况。结果 16例患者随访6～15个月(平均9.5个月),切口均一期愈合,无感染、皮肤坏死,内固定物无松动或断裂,无骨折延迟愈合或畸形愈合发生。结论应用锁定加压钢板结合经皮微创钢板固定技术治疗胫骨中下段骨折具有操作简单、损伤小、骨折愈合率高、功能恢复快等优点,是治疗胫骨中下段骨折理想的治疗方法。     

内锁针治疗股骨干骨折的临床研究

目的探讨自锁髓内针和带锁髓内针治疗股骨干骨折的临床疗效。方法选择本院收治的股骨干骨折患者80例,随机分成实验组和对照组;实验组采用自锁髓内针固定,对照组采用带锁髓内针固定,分别对两组患者治疗前后髋关节功能进行评分。结果实验组患者手术时间[（58．3±39．4）min vs．（97．4±32．2）min]、临床愈合时间[（70．4±11．5）dVS．（91．2±11.3）d]以及住院时间[（14．4±6．6）d vs．（19．5±7．8）d]明显少于对照组（P〈0．05）;两组患者治疗后髋关节评分、疗效评价结果以及并发症的发生情况差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论自锁髓内针与带锁髓内针在治疗股骨干骨折中均可达到较好的疗效,但自锁髓内针比带锁髓内针手术操作简单、手术时间短、骨折愈合快,值得在临床治疗股骨干骨折工作中开展应用。