Comparison of the systematic Inflammatory response syndrome and the quick sequential organ failure assessment for prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department: A systematic review

BackgroundAwareness and prompt recognition of sepsis are essential for nurses working in the emergency department (ED), enabling them to make an initial assessment of patients and then to sort them according to their condition s severity. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department by comparing the previous sepsis-2 screening tool, the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and the current sepsis-3 screening tool, the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).MethodsThis systematic review used the guideline by Bettany-Saltikov and McSherry and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted using the CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Study selection and risk of bias was performed independently by pair of authors.ResultsFive articles were included. Overall, SIRS showed higher sensitivity than qSOFA, while qSOFA showed higher specificity than SIRS. The positive predictive value for qSOFA was superior, while there was a minor deviation in negative predictive value between qSOFA and SIRS.ConclusionThe overall recommendation based on the included studies indicates that qSOFA is the better-suited screening tool for prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department.     

Coping with osteoarthritis by older adults

Objective . To extend to patients with osteoarthritis (OA) the coping model developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods . Relationships among appraisal, coping, and impact of OA were examined in a prospective study. Older men and women with OA (n = 82) were recruited from the community and were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months. Appraisal at baseline was measured by an interview addressing patients' beliefs about the intensity of their OA. Active, passive, and behavioral coping were assessed at 1 month, and the impact on OA pain, affective status, and mood was assessed at 4 months. Results . Appraisal of OA as more intense was related to the use of more passive coping at 1 month, and was also related to more negative mood at 4 months. Active coping was predictive of less depressed affective status, whereas passive coping was predictive of subsequent worsening of negative mood. These relationships remained significant after controlling for demographic and medical history variables and functional status measures associated with dependent variables. No relation of either appraisal or coping to pain or positive mood was observed. Conclusions . The findings suggests that as patients' appraisals of the intensity of their OA decrease, less use of passive coping strategies, which are associated with poorer outcomes, should result. It is recommended that interventions to reduce OA impact should include both modification of appraisals of OA and modification of patients' coping strategies.