To investigate the preoperative use of combination metformin and statin versus monotherapy on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in diabetic men.
Patients and Methods
Data of 843 diabetic men who underwent RP were stratified on the basis of preoperative use of no drug or of metformin, statin, or both. Multivariable Cox models were used to test the association between treatment and BCR. In a secondary analysis, models were stratified by race and body mass index (BMI) and further adjusted for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Results
A total of 259 men (31%) received statin therapy, 94 (11%) metformin, 307 (36%) metformin + statin, and 183 (22%) neither. Five-year BCR-free survival rates were 75% in metformin only versus 75% in metformin + statin versus 60% in statin versus 68% in no drug groups (log-rank, P = .003). On multivariable analysis, preoperative statin use was associated with increased BCR risk versus men receiving neither drug (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.64). Metformin alone (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.47) and metformin + statin (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.58-1.33) were unrelated to BCR risks. In secondary analysis, the association between statin use and higher BCR risk was similar regardless of race, but was stronger among men with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (HR 3.12; 95% CI, 1.70-5.72). These results were largely unchanged after adjusting for HbA1c.
Conclusion
Among diabetic men undergoing RP, preoperative statin use was associated with worse BCR risk, especially among men with a high BMI, but these associations may be mitigated by concomitant use of metformin. If validated in future findings, research is needed to understand the basis for these associations. 相似文献
ABSTRACT This article describes the experience of two years of working with migrants residing in the city of Glasgow, Scotland. Three different groups, with participants from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe, students, migrants and asylum seekers, converged in three different spaces and frameworks. A total of 51 participants, six men and 41 women between 20 and 50 years of age, took part in spontaneous movement workshops to promote their health, body awareness and well-being, the strengthening of affective bonds and creativity. The impact of the sessions was assessed through an anonymous survey, a semi-structured interview and a facilitator’s diary of the sessions. The settings of the three groups were not identical and, thus, did not allow for a comparison between them. However, the results showed that the sessions helped participants to increase their sense of well-being and confidence, facilitate their integration process and strengthen their bonds with other participants. 相似文献
Introduction: Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the leading cause of death and disability in the developed countries. Lipid-lowering therapy is a cornerstone of the CV risk modification strategy. The first line treatment for hyperlipidemia is statins, which decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 30–50% and proportionally reduce the CV events. However, they are not always enough to achieve LDL-C goals in many patients, and some patients are statin intolerant. For this reason, new powerful injectable lipid-lowering drugs have been developed.
Areas covered: The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the more recent clinical data on safety and tolerability of injectable lipid-lowering drugs. After an attentive literature search, the authors resumed here information on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab), small interfering RNA molecule inclisiran, antisense oligonucleotides (mipomersen, volanesorsen, ISIS 681257), and drugs targeting angiopoietin-like protein 3 (evinacumab, IONIS-ANGPTL3Rx).
Expert opinion: Injectable lipid-lowering therapy for patients at high risk for CV disease complications or with severe inherited hypercholesterolemias can be an important element of the available therapeutic armamentarium. Clinical data prove the favorable risk-benefit profile of evolocumab, alirocumab, and inclisiran. Mipomersen, volanesorsen, ISIS 681257, evinacumab, and IONIS-ANGPTL3Rx safety is currently less extensively studied, especially in patients with comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy. 相似文献
Objective: Psychotherapy research commonly utilizes clients’ last session score as an indicator of treatment outcome. We examined whether this last session score is consistent with what would be predicted based on clients’ general trajectory in psychological functioning across sessions. We focused on the unstandardized residual variance at the last session, as this represents the degree to which the session score is divergent (or not) from what is predicted from the previous sessions (i.e., Outcome Stability Index; OSI). Method: The sample included 27,958 clients who attended on average 9.41 sessions. Each session, clients completed the Behavioral Health Measure-20 as a measure of psychological functioning. We converted the unstandardized residual variance for clients’ last session score into a Cohen’s d coefficient to aid in interpretation. Results: The mean OSI was 0.07 (SD?=?0.58), suggesting excellent stability in their last session therapy outcome scores. However, approximately 33% of clients demonstrated poor or extremely problematic stability in their last session therapy outcome scores. Clients who demonstrated poor stability were classified as demonstrating reliable deterioration. Conclusions: Researchers may want to consider reporting OSI to assist readers’ understanding of the stability of therapy outcomes.
Clinical or methodological significance of this article: Therapy outcome scores can vary from session to session, which can influence how we understand therapy outcomes that rely on last session scores. Studies examining therapy outcomes could report the Outcome Stability Index to better contextualize the results. 相似文献
BackgroundThe efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.MethodsThis international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial enrolled 3,799 patients (age <75 years) with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter). The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months.ResultsThe combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%) receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.18; p = 0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 1.09; p = 0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups.ConclusionAmong patients age <75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel. (Ticagrelor in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Pharmacological Thrombolysis [TREAT]; NCT02298088) 相似文献