血清Lp-PLA2水平对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术中无复流发生的预测价值

目的分析血清脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)水平对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ASTEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术中无复流发生的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2017年1～12月首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院收治的96例ASTEMI患者的临床资料,均行急诊PCI术治疗。根据术中是否发生复流将患者分为两组,其中术中发生复流者为A组(n=72),术中无复流者为B组(n=24)。比较两组患者的基线资料,包括性别、年龄、血压、心率、吸烟史、空腹血糖等和PCI相关情况,包括支架数量、发病至再灌注时间、血栓抽吸例数、支架长度等,并通过单因素与多因素Logistic回归分析分析影响患者术中无复流发生的相关因素。结果经单因素分析结果发现,B组患者发病至再灌注时间[(7. 19±1. 32) h]较A组[(5. 65±1. 71) h]明显延长,且血清Lp-PLA2含量[(309. 24±76. 34) mg/L]较A组[(197. 07±55. 35) mg/L]显著升高(P 0. 05);而其它基本资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0. 05)。经多因素Logistic回归分析发现,血清Lp-PLA2含量是患者术中无复流发生的影响因素(OR=3. 84,95%CI:1. 64～9. 01,P 0. 01)。结论血清Lp-PLA2含量是ASTEMI患者急诊PCI术中发生无复流的影响因素,故临床中可通过早期测定血清Lp-PLA2含量预判断ASTEMI患者PCI术中发生无复流的可能性。     

依巴斯汀及卡介菌多糖核酸治疗慢性荨麻疹的临床研究

目的:研究慢性荨麻疹应用依巴斯汀及卡介菌多糖核酸的临床效果。方法:将确诊并收治的136例慢性荨麻疹患者随机分为研究组和对照组各68例。对照组单纯应用依巴斯汀实施口服治疗,研究组在对照组基础上加用卡介菌多糖核酸进行肌内注射治疗。对比两组临床疗效,治疗前后症状积分变化,不良反应,随访期荨麻疹复发率。结果:研究组总有效率为86.08%,显著优于对照组的64.56%(P<0.05)。两组治疗前瘙痒、皮损直径、皮损数目及荨麻疹发作情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后均比治疗前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而研究组其瘙痒、皮损直径、皮损数目及荨麻疹发作情况改善幅度显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组均无显著不良反应发生。研究组复发率为7.35%,显著低于对照组的38.24%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:慢性荨麻疹应用依巴斯汀及卡介菌多糖核酸临床疗效显著,可迅速有效地遏制荨麻疹的临床症状并降低荨麻疹的复发风险,且安全性好。     

省内异地就医结算 明年有望基本实现

<正>人力资源和社会保障部、财政部、卫生计生委近日联合印发《关于进一步做好基本医疗保险异地就医医疗费用结算工作的指导意见》,对备受老百姓关注的异地就医结算问题做出了实质性推动。然而要实现医保全国"漫游"的终极目标不可能一步到位。2015年我国将基本实现地市和省(区、市)范围内异地就医住院费用的直接结算。"据测算,医保省内‘漫游’可以解决90%的异地就医问题。"人社部相关负责人说,     

沙美特罗氟替卡松对COPD患者的治疗效果及安全性分析

目的探讨沙美特罗氟替卡松在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的治疗效果及安全性。方法选取2014年4月至2015年7月我院收治的COPD患者92例,随机分为两组。对照组行常规治疗,研究组在对照组基础上给予沙美特罗氟替卡松治疗。两组患者均连续治疗6个月。比较两组的疗效及不良反应发生率。结果研究组的总有效率为97.83%,显著高于对照组的82.61%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组的关节痛发生率为23.91%,显著高于对照组的2.17%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者皮疹、水肿、胃肠不适发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论沙美特罗氟替卡松治疗COPD患者可提高疗效,但长期使用可引起患者骨密度下降,发生关节疼痛,临床中应针对性进行预防。     

外周血免疫细胞在NAFLD疾病进展中的诊断价值

近日,范建高教授应《柳叶刀》旗下子刊EBioMedicine(影响因子8.413分)编辑部邀请,与博士生林双喆在线发表综述:Peripheral immune cells in NAFLD patients:A spyhole to disease progression,EBioMedicine 2021 doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103768,系统分析非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)及其不同临床病理类型亚组患者循环外周血液各种免疫细胞的特征性变化,并探讨了外周血免疫细胞变化用于无创诊断与评估NAFLD的严重类型非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)的潜在价值。     

COPD病人应用自血疗法联合沙美特罗替卡松粉吸入剂的疗效及护理观察

目的:探讨用自血疗法联合沙美特罗替卡松粉吸入剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效及护理.方法:选取156例COPD病人为研究对象,以平行对照法为原则分组,将采用沙美特罗替卡松粉吸入剂治疗的78例设为对照组,将合并使用自血疗法的78例设为试验组,分析疗效差异性.结果:试验组临床治疗总有效率(97.44％)比对照组(88.46％)高(P<0.05);试验组1秒率(FEV1/FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)比对照组高,试验组6 min步行距离比对照组长(P<0.05).结论:在COPD临床治疗中将自血疗法和沙美特罗替卡松粉吸入剂合并使用,并配合合理的护理措施,能改善疗效.     

经鼻高流量氧气湿化治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭的可行性研究

ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of transnasal heated humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with respiratory failure in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 176 elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure who were hospitalized at Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2016 to January 2022 were enrolled, including 82 patients in an HFNC group and 94 patients in an NPPV group. After treatment, pulse oxygen saturation (SPO₂), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂), oxygenation index (OI), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), comfort score, discharge rate, rate of endotracheal intubation, rate of transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. Statistical data are expressed in percentage or number of cases and the χ² test was used for their comparisons. ResultsThe SPO₂ values at 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h were significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.049,-2.618, and -3.314, P=0.043, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively). SPO₂ before discharge was significantly lower than that of the NPPV group (t=2.162, P=0.033), but OI at each time point and before discharge had no statistical significance (P＞0.05). MAP at 6 h was significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.209, P=0.029), but within the normal range. HRs at 2 h and 3 h in the HFNC group were significantly higher than those of the NPPV group (t=-2.199 and -2.336, P=0.030 and 0.021, respectively). There were no significant differences in RR, HR, or MAP between the two groups at other time points and before discharge (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in PaCO2 between the two groups (P＞0.05). Comfort score in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that of the NPPV group (t=-46.807, P＜0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge rate, ICU transfer rate, endotracheal intubation rate, and mortality between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionHFNC is as effective as NPPV in treating elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅰ or mild type Ⅱ respiratory failure, and HFNC is more comfortable than NPPV.