Association of social determinants of health with late diagnosis and survival of patients with pancreatic cancer

BackgroundPancreatic cancer disparities have been described. However, it is unknown if they contribute to a late diagnosis and survival of patients with metastatic disease. Identifying their role is important as it will open the door for interventions. We hypothesize that social determinants of health (SDH) such as income, education, race, and insurance status impact (I) stage of diagnosis of PC (Stage IV vs. other stages), and (II) overall survival (OS) in Stage IV patients.MethodsUsing the National Cancer Database, we evaluated a primary outcome of diagnosis of Stage IV PC and a secondary outcome of OS. Primary predictors included race, income, education, and insurance. Covariates included age, sex and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. Univariate, multivariable logistic regression models evaluated risk of a late diagnosis. Univariate, multivariable Cox proportional hazards model examined OS. 95% confidence intervals were used.Results230,877 patients were included, median age of 68 years (SD 12.1). In univariate analysis, a better education, higher income, and insurance decreased the odds of Stage IV PC, while Black race increased it. In multivariable analysis, education [>93% high-school completion (HSC) vs. <82.4%, OR 0.96 (0.93–0.99)] and insurance [private vs. no, OR 0.72 (0.67–0.74)] significantly decreased the risk of a late diagnosis, whereas Black race increased the odds [vs. White, OR 1.09 (1.07–1.12)]. In univariate Cox analysis, having a higher income, insurance and better education improved OS, while Black race worsened it. In multivariable Cox, higher income [>$63,333 (vs. <$40,277), HR 0.87 (0.85–0.89)] and insurance [private vs. no, HR 0.77 (0.74–0.79)] improved OS.ConclusionsSDH impacted the continuum of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, including stage at diagnosis and overall survival.     

肺癌免疫治疗中分离反应的研究进展

肺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,也是全球癌症死亡的主要原因[1]。近年来,随着免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoint inhibitors,ICIs) 的应用、发展与兴起,一小部分晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC) 患者可从中获益。随着对ICIs药物应用后治疗效果的观察,与化疗药物及靶向药物可引起的典型反应,包括完全缓解(complete response,CR)、部分缓解(partial response,PR)、疾病稳定(stable disease,SD)、疾病进展(progressive disease,PD)比较,ICIs可引起另一种非典型反应模式,包括超进展、假性进展、分离反应等。与前两种非典型反应模式比较,目前的研究数据对分离反应的研究报道相对较少。本文回顾一些分离反应的研究,探讨其意义并思考其后续治疗方法。     

我国首株肝螺杆菌的分离培养与鉴定

目的 肝螺杆菌是定植在动物的肝胆及肠道能引起增殖性肝炎,肝癌,盲结肠炎的非胃螺杆菌,关于该菌我国还未见报道.本实验室试图分离培养肝螺杆菌(H.hepaticus).方法 BALB/c小鼠肠粘膜匀浆空肠弯曲菌血琼脂培养基微需氧条件下培养5～7 d.结果 本实验室从BALB/c小鼠肠道中微需氧条件下成功分离出了国内第一株H.hepaticus,并通过形态学,生化反应,细菌基因测序分析鉴定证实,这对开展国内在非胃内螺杆菌研究上有重要的意义.关键字:螺杆菌,肝;分离;鉴定     

Experimental evidence of physician social preferences

Physicians’ professional ethics require that they put patients’ interests ahead of their own and that they should allocate limited medical resources efficiently. Understanding physicians’ extent of adherence to these principles requires understanding the social preferences that lie behind them. These social preferences may be divided into two qualitatively different trade-offs: the trade-off between self and other (altruism) and the trade-off between reducing differences in payoffs (equality) and increasing total payoffs (efficiency). We experimentally measure social preferences among a nationwide sample of practicing physicians in the United States. Our design allows us to distinguish empirically between altruism and equality–efficiency orientation and to accurately measure both trade-offs at the level of the individual subject. We further compare the experimentally measured social preferences of physicians with those of a representative sample of Americans, an “elite” subsample of Americans, and a nationwide sample of medical students. We find that physicians’ altruism stands out. Although most physicians place a greater weight on self than on other, the share of physicians who place a greater weight on other than on self is twice as large as for all other samples—32% as compared with 15 to 17%. Subjects in the general population are the closest to physicians in terms of altruism. The higher altruism among physicians compared with the other samples cannot be explained by income or age differences. By contrast, physicians’ preferences regarding equality–efficiency orientation are not meaningfully different from those of the general sample and elite subsample and are less efficiency oriented than medical students.

In a classic article, Kenneth Arrow (1) argued that asymmetric information pervades the health-care market. Patients rely on physicians’ expert knowledge in planning their medical care. Health insurers and government agencies (Medicare and Medicaid) largely rely on physicians to decide which treatments are appropriate for their patients. This deference to physicians’ authority may be justified given their superior expertise and informational advantages (2). However, the dual role of recommending and providing treatments creates opportunities for physicians to place their interests ahead of their patients’ interests, for example by recommending profitable tests and treatments that offer little or no health benefits. A second risk is more subtle. Physicians must trade off their individual patients’ interests in getting care, even if the benefit is likely to be small, against society’s interest in allocating limited medical resources efficiently, in order to generate the greatest benefits for the overall health of a population.The norms of physician professionalism—including, in particular, the patient-centered norms that constitute physicians’ traditional professional ethic—are intended to address the risk of selfishness. Arrow argues that due to information asymmetry, the principle of“buyer beware” that governs ordinary consumer markets should be replaced, in health care, by the physicians’ professional responsibility to put patients’ interests ahead of their own (1). Physician leaders publicly promote the importance of professionalism, while exhorting physicians to act altruistically. For example, the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine have asserted that “medicine is one of the few spheres of human activity in which the purposes are unambiguously altruistic” (3), while the American Board of Internal Medicine similarly asserts that “altruism is the essence of professionalism … the best interest of patients, not self-interest, is the rule” (4). On the other hand, empirical studies have suggested that, at least in some situations, some physicians create “supplier-induced demand,” which influences a patient’s demand for care “against the physician’s interpretation of the best interest of the patient” (5), contributing to skepticism about whether physicians do in fact behave altruistically. [Such skepticism is not limited to medicine. Legal ethics, for example, has long sought to control lawyers’ abuse of discretion through professional norms of client loyalty and care (6). But skeptics have cast these norms as self-serving, and the law governing lawyers increasingly subjects them to elaborate institutionalized mechanisms of bureaucratic control.]While the effects of professional norms on physician behavior are difficult to measure directly, a clearer understanding of physicians’ social preferences can help to illuminate whether professional norms and physicians’ individual preferences are oppositional or aligned. Our study therefore helps to evaluate the likely effectiveness of both professional norms and the turn to bureaucracy. While altruism and related professional norms are important in many other professions (7), the distinct characteristics of the market for medical care, namely information asymmetry and uncertainty in the relationship between medical treatments and patient outcomes (1), render it especially critical to study these issues among physicians.Health care systems in the US and elsewhere address the second risk—concerning efficiency—in more complex ways. Although professional ethics give physicians a responsibility to conserve scarce medical resources (8), the norm that directs individual physicians to put their patients first may render a norm-based approach inadequate to the problem of efficiency (9). Health insurers therefore use bureaucratic mechanisms and financial incentives to manage the information asymmetry between a physician who knows the specific patient’s situation and the insurer which does not (9).^*We deploy an incentivized economic experiment to investigate both altruism (the trade-off between self and other) and equality–efficiency orientation (the trade-off between reducing self–other differences in payouts and increasing payout totals) in practicing US physicians, and we compare our results with analogous experiments that measure parallel behaviors in other populations. A vast literature considers social preferences, and laboratory experiments have been very fruitful in both establishing the empirical reliability of such preferences and directing theoretical attention to them. [We will not attempt to review the enormous body of work in behavioral and experimental economics on social preferences. Camerer (10) provides a comprehensive discussion, if now somewhat dated, of the vast body of experimental and theoretical research in economics focusing on dictator, ultimatum, and trust games. Engel (11) provides the most comprehensive meta-study of dictator games.] After presenting our results, we relate them to the results from prior work that are particularly relevant to our study (Discussion). We note that the social preferences of physicians and professionals more generally remain relatively understudied, and our discussion of the relationship between our study and prior work explains the specific contributions that we make.Our sample consists of 284 physicians from 36 medical groups around the United States, including physicians in primary care (internal medicine and family medicine) and cardiology, and physicians in private practices and employed by hospitals. Our experiment gives subjects broad discretion to implement their preferences, free from bureaucratic control or even surveillance. Our results therefore inform the question whether norms are likely to affect physician choices along both dimensions of behavior. Our study measures altruism in a large multisite sample of practicing physicians and measures both dimensions of social preferences.Our experiment asked subjects to make trade-offs between their own self-interest and the interest of an anonymous other and, at the same time, between equality and efficiency. These two aspects of social preferences often operate together, but they remain conceptually distinct. [Social preferences can be weighted toward equality (reducing differences in payoffs) or weighted toward efficiency (increasing total payoffs) and range from pure utilitarian to maxmin or Rawlsianism. As the dispute between Harsanyi (12, 13) and Rawls (14) shows, fair-minded people (who are all perfectly impartial between self and other) can disagree about how to trade off equality and efficiency. The work of Harsanyi and Rawls, and of the many others who have followed them, has had broad-reaching influence across many disciplines, including philosophy, economics, and law.] To capture both of these features in our experiment, we employ a modified dictator game (15–17) in which we ask physicians to allocate real money between themselves and an anonymous other drawn from a broadly representative sample of the US population. Our experiment presents subjects with allocation decisions in which the “price of giving” varies across decision problems—sometimes the subject may need to sacrifice more than a token (the experimental currency)—to give a single token to other (the recipient); in other decisions, it may cost only a fraction of a token. These decisions are made through an intuitive “point-and-click” graphical interface in which the choices are represented as a budget line where each point represents a possible allocation. The slope of the line captures the price of giving tokens to other.^†Intuitively, this method allowed us to collect a rich dataset capable of measuring both altruism and equality–efficiency orientation at the level of the individual subject. [The importance of studying individual heterogeneity in social preferences is emphasized by Andreoni and Miller (17). Because of this heterogeneity, it is necessary to investigate behavior at an individual level. Our experimental design allows subjects to make numerous choices over a wide range of budget lines, and this yields a rich dataset that is well-suited to analysis at the individual level. It is clearly advantageous to estimate individual-level parameters and then generate individual-level distributions of the estimations rather than to pool data and then estimate population-level parameters.] The degree of altruism is reflected in the amount subjects give on average, whereas equality–efficiency orientation is captured by how subjects respond to the price of giving. Increasing the fraction of the budget spent on other as the price of giving increases indicates social preferences weighted toward equality (reducing the difference in payoffs between self and other), whereas decreasing it when the price of giving increases indicates social preferences weighted toward efficiency (increasing the total payoffs to self and other). We rely on techniques developed in our prior work (15, 16, 18) to evaluate the consistency of physicians’ choices (i.e., whether they reflect a complete and transitive preference ordering) and to explore the structure of the social utility functions that rationalize the observed data.We further compare physicians’ preferences with preferences previously measured in three other populations using equivalent experiments: 1) a broadly representative sample of US adults (18), 2) an “elite” subsample of those who hold a graduate degree and have an annual household income over $100,000 (15, 18), and 3) a sample of medical students from nine schools around the United States (19, 20). The social preferences of these populations provide important benchmarks against which physicians’ social preferences can be assessed; furthermore, the comparison with medical students may shed light on whether physicians’ distinctive social preferences reflect a “selection effect” based on who enters medicine or a “treatment effect” of practicing medicine.^‡We begin our analysis of the experimental data by using classical revealed preference theory (21–23) to test whether subjects’ choices are consistent with the essence of all traditional models of economic decision-making—utility maximization.^§ Our physician subjects exhibit a remarkably high degree of consistency when compared with other populations, including medical students and also students from Yale Law School (YLS), the population that had exhibited the highest degree of consistency in prior experiments (15). [In our subsequent analysis, we do not draw detailed comparisons between our physician sample and the sample YLS students (15). The experimental design in Fisman et al. (15) differs from the current one in that the YLS student subjects were asked to allocate money between themselves and another student, rather than an individual drawn from a sample broadly representative of the US adults.] This result reveals that our physician subjects are highly adept at implementing a consistent, well-behaved social preference ordering. This makes it natural to estimate—at the level of the individual subject—the substantive social preferences that physicians display.We then estimate social preferences at the level of the individual physician using a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) utility function commonly employed by economists in demand analysis. The CES functional form is appealing because the degree of altruism and equality–efficiency orientation are each independently represented in a precise and transparent manner through its two parameters, which we estimate separately for each subject (further details on the CES specification and estimation are provided in Empirical Framework).We find that physicians are more altruistic than any other population, while physicians’ preferences concerning the trade-off between equality and efficiency are almost indistinguishable graphically from the preferences of the American Life Panel (ALP) elites and also the broader ALP sample. These findings on physicians’ distinctive social preferences have direct and concrete implications for professionalism, incentives, and bureaucratic rules directed at physicians. Insofar as physicians are altruistic, they may be more likely to live up to the professional ideal of putting patients’ interests ahead of their own. At the same time, altruism as captured in our experiment is far from ubiquitous, even among physicians and, furthermore, physicians’ efficiency orientation is indistinguishable from than that of the general population. Taken together, our findings suggest that the ideal of physician professionalism—putting the patient first—is not merely a self-serving myth but that other mechanisms may be required to support the quality of medical care and to promote efficient allocation of medical resources.     

Altruistic acting caused by a touching hand: neural underpinnings of the Midas touch effect

Giving and receiving touch are some of the most important social stimuli we exchange in daily life. By touching someone, we can communicate various types of information. Previous studies have also demonstrated that interpersonal touch may affect our altruistic behavior. A classic study showed that customers give bigger tips when they are lightly touched by a waitress, which has been called the Midas touch effect. Numerous studies reported similar effects of touch on different kinds of helping or prosocial behaviors. Here, we aim to examine the neural underpinnings of this effect by employing a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach. While lying in the scanner, participants played different rounds of the dictator game, a measure of prosocial behavior. Before each round, participants were touched (or not touched in the control condition) by an experimenter. We found that touching the hand increased the likeliness to behave prosocial (but not the general liking of control stimuli), thereby confirming the Midas touch effect. The effect was predicted by activity in the primary somatosensory cortex, indicating that the somatosensory cortex here plays a causal role in prosocial behavior. We conclude that the tactile modality in social life may be much more important than previously thought.     

社区居民社会支持与应付方式的相关研究

目的了解社区居民社会支持、应付方式及其相互关系,为社区心理卫生服务及其社区卫生服务的管理提供科学依据。方法采用应付方式问卷和社会支持评定量表,对武汉市某社区居民200人进行调查。结果不同年龄组的社区居民在合理化因子、主观支持、支持利用度上存在显著性差异;社区居民男女在应付方式的各因子及社会支持各项得分不存在性别差异;社会支持各项与解决问题、求助呈正相关并有显著性意义;社会支持各项与自责、幻想、退避、合理化呈负相关。结论社区居民应付方式和社会支持不存在性别差异,但存在年龄差异;社区居民的社会支持与应付方式存在相关。     

Nucleic Acid Preservation Card Surveillance Is Effective for Monitoring Arbovirus Transmission on Crocodile Farms and Provides a One Health Benefit to Northern Australia

The Kunjin strain of West Nile virus (WNV_KUN) is a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus that can infect farmed saltwater crocodiles in Australia and cause skin lesions that devalue the hides of harvested animals. We implemented a surveillance system using honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards to monitor WNV_KUN and another endemic flavivirus pathogen, Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV), on crocodile farms in northern Australia. The traps were set between February 2018 and July 2020 on three crocodile farms in Darwin (Northern Territory) and one in Cairns (North Queensland) at fortnightly intervals with reduced trapping during the winter months. WNV_KUN RNA was detected on all three crocodile farms near Darwin, predominantly between March and May of each year. Two of the NT crocodile farms also yielded the detection of MVE viral RNA sporadically spread between April and November in 2018 and 2020. In contrast, no viral RNA was detected on crocodile farms in Cairns during the entire trapping period. The detection of WNV_KUN and MVEV transmission by FTA^TM cards on farms in the Northern Territory generally correlated with the detection of their transmission to sentinel chicken flocks in nearby localities around Darwin as part of a separate public health surveillance program. While no isolates of WNV_KUN or MVEV were obtained from mosquitoes collected on Darwin crocodile farms immediately following the FTA^TM card detections, we did isolate another flavivirus, Kokobera virus (KOKV), from Culex annulirostris mosquitoes. Our studies support the use of the FTA^TM card system as a sensitive and accurate method to monitor the transmission of WNV_KUN and other arboviruses on crocodile farms to enable the timely implementation of mosquito control measures. Our detection of MVEV transmission and isolation of KOKV from mosquitoes also warrants further investigation of their potential role in causing diseases in crocodiles and highlights a “One Health” issue concerning arbovirus transmission to crocodile farm workers. In this context, the introduction of FTA^TM cards onto crocodile farms appears to provide an additional surveillance tool to detect arbovirus transmission in the Darwin region, allowing for a more timely intervention of vector control by relevant authorities.     

Oral Administration of East Asian Herbal Medicine for Inflammatory Skin Lesions in Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review,Meta-Analysis,and Exploration of Core Herbal Materials

Psoriasis is an inflammatory autoimmune skin disease with various clinical manifestations. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral administration of East Asian herbal medicine (EAHM) for inflammatory skin lesions in psoriasis and to explore core herbal materials for drug discovery. A comprehensive search was conducted in 10 electronic databases for randomized controlled trials from their inception until 29 July 2021. Statistical analysis was performed in R version 4.1.2 and R studio. When heterogeneity in studies was detected, the cause was identified through sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis. Methodological quality was independently assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. A total of 56 trials with 4966 psoriasis patients met the selection criteria. Meta-analysis favored EAHM monotherapy on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 70 (RR: 1.2845; 95% CI: 1.906 to 1.3858, p < 0.0001), PASI 60 (RR: 1.1923; 95% CI: 1.1134 to 1.2769, p < 0.0001), continuous PASI score (MD: −2.3386, 95% CI: −3.3068 to −1.3704, p < 0.0001), IL-17, IL-23, TNF-α, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. Patients treated with EAHM monotherapy had significantly reduced adverse events incidence rate. In addition, based on additional examination of the herb data included in this meta-analysis, 16 core materials were identified. They are utilized in close proximity to one another, and all have anti-inflammatory properties. The findings in this study support that oral EAHM monotherapy may be beneficial for inflammatory skin lesions in psoriasis. Meanwhile, the identified core materials are expected to be utilized as useful drug candidate hypotheses through follow-up studies on individual pharmacological activities and synergistic effects.