Ionizing Radiation Knowledge Among Emergency Department Providers

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess knowledge of ionizing radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging examinations among emergency department (ED) providers.MethodsAn electronic questionnaire was distributed to ED providers in a five-hospital university-affiliated health care system. Providers included attending emergency medicine (EM) physicians, EM residents, and midlevel providers (MLPs) (nurse practitioners and physicians assistants). Data were collected and analyzed.ResultsOne hundred six of 210 providers (41 attending physicians, 32 residents, and 31 MLPs) completed the survey, for a response rate of 50.5%. More than two in five providers (44.6%) could not correctly identify which of six common imaging modalities used ionizing radiation. MLPs were more likely to incorrectly identify radiography (25%) and fluoroscopy (29%) as modalities that did not use ionizing radiation (P = .01 and P = .25 respectively). Fewer attending physicians (14.6%) than residents (37.5%) were not very comfortable or were uncomfortable explaining the risks of radiation to patients. Nearly half of attending physicians (47.5%) and nearly three-quarters of residents (71.9%) were not very comfortable, were uncomfortable, or were extremely uncomfortable explaining the amount of radiation in certain imaging tests to patients. MLPs were more likely to incorrectly rank a selection of imaging tests by radiation exposure (P = .002). MLPs were more likely to incorrectly answer a question on the effects of ionizing radiation on patients (P = .01).ConclusionsAmong ED providers, there are knowledge gaps regarding the presence and effect of ionizing radiation in diagnostic imaging tests. MLPs were more likely to make factual errors, while EM residents were least comfortable counseling patients about radiation risks.     

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Community-Acquired Pneumonia Core Measures Lead to Unnecessary Antibiotic Administration by Emergency Physicians

Objectives: The objectives were to assess emergency physician (EP) understanding of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) core measures for community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines and to determine their self‐reported effect on antibiotic prescribing patterns. Methods: A convenience sample of EPs from five medical centers in North Carolina was anonymously surveyed via a Web‐based instrument. Participants indicated their level of understanding of the CMS CAP guidelines and the effects on their prescribing patterns for antibiotics. Results: A total of 121 EPs completed the study instrument (81%). All respondents were aware of the CMS CAP guidelines. Of these, 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 92% to 98%) correctly understood the time‐based guidelines for antibiotic administration, although 24% (95% CI = 17% to 31%) incorrectly identified the onset of this time period. Nearly all physicians (96%; 95% CI = 93% to 99%) reported institutional commitment to meet these core measures, and 84% (95% CI = 78% to 90%) stated that they had a department‐based CAP protocol. More than half of the respondents (55%; 95% CI = 47% to 70%) reported prescribing antibiotics to patients they did not believe had pneumonia in an effort to comply with the CMS guidelines, and 42% (95% CI = 34% to 50%) of these stated that they did so more than three times per month. Only 40% (95% CI = 32% to 48%) of respondents indicated a belief that the guidelines improve patient care. Of those, this was believed to occur by increasing pneumonia awareness (60%; 95% CI = 52% to 68%) and improving hospital processes when pneumonia is suspected (86%; 95% CI = 80% to 92%). Conclusions: Emergency physicians demonstrate awareness of the current CMS CAP guidelines. Most physicians surveyed reported the presence of institutional protocols to increase compliance. More than half of EPs reported that they feel the guidelines led to unnecessary antibiotic usage for patients who are not suspected to have pneumonia. Only 40% of EPs believe that CAP awareness and expedient care resulting from these guidelines has improved overall pneumonia‐related patient care. Outcome‐based data for non–intensive care unit CAP patients are lacking, and EPs report that they prescribe antibiotics when they may not be necessary to comply with existing guidelines.     

A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Cuffed Emergency Cricothyrotomy Devices Using a Wire-Guided and a Catheter-Over-Needle Technique

Background: According to different algorithms of airway management, emergency cricothyrotomy is the final step in managing the otherwise inaccessible airway. As an alternative to an open surgical procedure, minimally invasive approaches exist. Various sets for different methods are commercially available. QuickTrach™ (VBM Medizintechnik GmbH, Sulz am Neckar, Germany) contains a plastic cannula over a metal needle for direct placement in the trachea, whereas a guide-wire is used for the actual placement of the cannula in the Melker Set™ (Cook Group Incorporated, Bloomington, IN). Objective: We hypothesize that the direct puncture involving less discrete steps is faster to perform. However, it will lead to more complications due to the higher force needed to place the relatively thick needle. Method: After approval of the local ethics committee, the study was performed on cadavers of 16 adult sheep. A wire-guided cricothyrotomy was compared with a catheter-over-needle technique. Successful placement and performance time were compared. Complication rate and maximal achieved airway pressure were evaluated. Data is given as mean and interquartile range, and Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05) for significant differences. Results: With the wire-guided technique, successful placement was possible in all attempts. The catheter-over-needle method was successful in 63% and had a higher complication rate (75% vs. 13%). The cannula-over-needle method allowed a faster cricothyrotomy (32 [2–34] vs. 53 [52–56] s). Both methods allowed the delivery of similar maximal airway pressures (50 [44–51] vs. 48 [43–53] mbar). Conclusion: The wire-guided method proved to be the more reliable technique, leading to fewer complications. However, the direct puncture was faster to perform. Placed accurately, both devices allowed sufficient ventilation.     

Differences between orthopaedic evaluation and radiological reports of conventional radiographs in patients with minor trauma admitted to the emergency department

IntroductionDuring night and on weekends, in our emergency department there is no radiologist on duty or on call: thus, X-ray examinations (XR) are evaluated by the orthopaedic surgeon on duty and reported the following morning/monday by radiologists. The aim of our study was to examine the discrepancy rate between orthopaedists and radiologists in the interpretation of imaging examinations performed on patients in our tertiary level orthopaedic institution and the consequences of delayed diagnosis in terms of patient management and therapeutic strategy.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all cases of discrepancy between orthopaedists and radiologists, which were categorized according to anatomical location of injury, initial diagnosis and treatment, change in diagnosis and treatment. We used the Chi square test to compare the frequencies of discrepancies between patients ≤14 and >14 years of age.ResultsFrom January to December 2016, 19,512 patients admitted to our emergency department performed at least an imaging examination; among these patients, 13,561 underwent XR in absence of an attending radiologist. A discrepant diagnosis was found in 337/13,561 (2.5%; 184 males; mean age: 36.7 ± 23.7, range 2–95); 151/337 (45%) discrepancies were encountered in the lower limbs, with ankle being the most common site of misdiagnosis (64/151), and 103/337 (30%) in the upper limbs, with the elbow being the most frequent site in this district (35/103). We found 293/337 false negatives (87%) and 44/337 false positives (13%), with 134 and 13 patients needing treatment change, respectively. We found 85/337 discrepancies (25%) in patients ≤14 years of age, and 252/337 (75%) in those >14 years. The distribution of discrepancies per anatomic district was significantly different (P < 0.001) in these two groups of patients.ConclusionsA low rate of discrepancy between orthopaedists and radiologists in evaluating images of patients admitted to our emergency department was found, although treatment change occurred in about half of cases. A thorough and accurate clinical evaluation is crucial to provide a correct treatment and prognosis.     

An Internet‐Based Communication Network for Information Transfer During Patient Transitions from Skilled Nursing Facility to the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the implementation of an Internet‐based communication system improves the amount of essential information conveyed between a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and the emergency department (ED) during patient care transitions. DESIGN: Interventional; before and after. SETTING: ED of an urban teaching hospital with approximately 55,000 visits per year and a 55‐bed subacute free‐standing rehabilitation facility (the SNF). PARTICIPANTS: All patients transferred from the SNF to the ED over 16 months. INTERVENTION: An Internet‐based communication network with SNF–ED transfer form for communication during patient care transitions. MEASUREMENTS: Nine elements of patient information assessed before and after intervention through chart review. Secondary outcomes: changes in efficiency of information transfer and staff satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty‐four of 237 preintervention and all 276 postintervention care transitions were reviewed. The Internet communication network was used in 78 (26%) of all care transitions, peaking at 40% by the end of the study. There was more critical patient information (1.85 vs 4.29 of 9 elements; P<.001) contained within fewer pages of transfer documents (24.47 vs 5.15; P<.001) after the intervention. Staff satisfaction with communication was higher among ED physicians after the intervention. CONCLUSION: The use of an Internet‐based system increased the amount of information communicated during SNF–ED care transitions and significantly reduced the number of pages in which this information was contained.     

Video as an Effective Method to Deliver Pretest Information for Rapid Human Immunodeficiency Testing

Objectives: Video‐based delivery of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pretest information might assist in streamlining HIV screening and testing efforts in the emergency department (ED). The objectives of this study were to determine if the video “Do you know about rapid HIV testing?” is an acceptable alternative to an in‐person information session on rapid HIV pretest information, in regard to comprehension of rapid HIV pretest fundamentals, and to identify patients who might have difficulties in comprehending pretest information. Methods: This was a noninferiority trial of 574 participants in an ED opt‐in rapid HIV screening program who were randomly assigned to receive identical pretest information from either an animated and live‐action 9.5‐minute video or an in‐person information session. Pretest information comprehension was assessed using a questionnaire. The video would be accepted as not inferior to the in‐person information session if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference (Δ) in mean scores on the questionnaire between the two information groups was less than a 10% decrease in the in‐person information session arm’s mean score. Linear regression models were constructed to identify patients with lower mean scores based upon study arm assignment, demographic characteristics, and history of prior HIV testing. Results: The questionnaire mean scores were 20.1 (95% CI = 19.7 to 20.5) for the video arm and 20.8 (95% CI = 20.4 to 21.2) for the in‐person information session arm. The difference in mean scores compared to the mean score for the in‐person information session met the noninferiority criterion for this investigation (Δ = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.26). In a multivariable linear regression model, Blacks/African Americans, Hispanics, and those with Medicare and Medicaid insurance exhibited slightly lower mean scores, regardless of the pretest information delivery format. There was a strong relationship between fewer years of formal education and lower mean scores on the questionnaire. Age, gender, type of insurance, partner/marital status, and history of prior HIV testing were not predictive of scores on the questionnaire. Conclusions: In terms of patient comprehension of rapid HIV pretest information fundamentals, the video was an acceptable substitute to pretest information delivered by an HIV test counselor. Both the video and the in‐person information session were less effective in providing pretest information for patients with fewer years of formal education.     

International Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Literature From 2008

As the specialty of emergency medicine (EM) continues to evolve in countries around the world, and as interest in international emergency medicine (IEM) continues to grow within the United States, the IEM Literature Review Group recognizes a need for a high‐quality, consolidated, and easily accessible evidence base of literature. In response to that need, the group created an annual publication that strives to provide readers with access to the highest quality and most relevant IEM research. This publication represents our fourth annual review, covering the top 26 IEM research articles published in 2008. Articles were selected for the review according to explicit, predetermined criteria that include both methodologic quality and perceived impact of the research. It is our hope that this annual review will act as a forum for disseminating best practices while also stimulating further research in the field of IEM.