Validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in the Korean Population

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the validity of the Korean version of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (K-ADI-R) and determine its efficacy in identifying individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). MethodsData were pooled from several past and ongoing studies as well as clinical records acquired at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2008 to 2017. The K-ADI-R were administered and scored by trained research reliable examiners. Measurements to investigate the validity of the K-ADI-R was through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and Cohen’s kappa. ResultsA total of 1,271 (age 88.9±62.42 months, male=927) participants were included. The K-ADI-R yielded strong psychometric properties with high sensitivity (86.06–99.27%), specificity (84.75–99.55%), PPV (92.33–99.72%), and NPV (79.43–98.64%). There were significant differences in item scores across the K-ADI-R diagnostic algorithm regardless of age and sex (p<0.001). Agreement between the K-ADI-R and other ASD related measurements ranged between levels of good to excellent. ConclusionDespite language or cultural boundaries, the K-ADI-R demonstrated high levels of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV within a wide range of participants; hence, suggesting promising usage as a valuable diagnostic instrument for individuals with ASD.     

Validation of multiple subject-specific finite element models of unicompartmental knee replacement

Accurate computer modelling of the fixation of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) is a valuable design tool. However, models must be validated with in vitro mechanical tests to have confidence in the results. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with differing bone densities were CT-scanned to obtain geometry and bone density data, then implanted with cementless medial Oxford UKRs by an orthopaedic surgeon. Five strain gauge rosettes were attached to the tibia and femur of each knee and the bone constructs were mechanically tested. They were re-tested following implanting the cemented versions of the implants.Finite element models of four UKR tibiae and femora were developed. Sensitivity assessments and convergence studies were conducted to optimise modelling parameters. The cemented UKR pooled R² values for predicted versus measured bone strains were 0.85 and 0.92 for the tibia and femur respectively. The cementless UKR pooled R² values were slightly lower at 0.62 and 0.73 which may have been due to the irregularity of bone resections. The correlation of the results was attributed partly to the improved material property prediction method used in this project. This study is the first to validate multiple UKR tibiae and femora for bone strain across a range of specimen bone densities.     

2014版ICSH血液分析仪评价指南介绍(下)

介绍了2014年国际血液学标准化委员会(ICSH)关于血液分析仪的性能评价指南。该指南从仪器的进样模式、批内精密度、批间精密度、携带污染、线性、标本稳定性、参考区间、准确性和可比性等方面对厂商提出了具体确认、评价的方法和要求,并推荐对流式细胞术和/或数字成像技术的白细胞分类计数、有核红细胞计数和未成熟粒细胞计数采用流式细胞免疫表型参考方法进行评价。每个临床实验室在仪器用于患者标本检测前,应对上述性能进行部分确认或转移。     

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the health literacy assessment tool METER in the Portuguese adult population

Objective

We aimed to culturally adapt and validate METER in the Portuguese population, and to define cut-off values for adequate health literacy.

Methods

We used the standard procedure for the adaptation of the words and surveyed health professionals to select the non-words. The instrument was administered to a total sample of 249 participants and retested in a sub-sample of 45 after three months. Cut-offs were defined using the modified Angoff procedure. Construct validity was assessed through association with educational attainment and health-related occupation.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed two dimensions of the instrument, one for words and another for non-words. METER showed a high degree of internal consistency, and acceptable test–retest reliability. Adequate health literacy was defined as scoring at least 35/40 in words and 18/30 in non-words. Physicians scored higher than any other group, followed by health researchers, researchers from other areas and by people with progressively lower levels of education (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We culturally adapted a brief and simple instrument for health literacy assessment, and showed it was valid and reliable.

Practice implications

The Portuguese version of METER can be used to assess health literacy in Portuguese adults and to explore associations with health outcomes.     

Construction and validation of a questionnaire on the knowledge of healthy habits and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in schoolchildren

ObjectivesTo develop and analyze the reliability and validity of a questionnaire on the knowledge of healthy habits and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CARDIOKID) to be used in schoolchildren.MethodsThe study included 145 children aged 7 to 11 years. The measured factors were the knowledge of healthy habits and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to verify reliability, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the validity of the questionnaire.ResultsThe sample consisted of 60% females and 40% males. In factorial analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test result was measures of sampling adequacy (MSA) = 0.81 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was X² = (66) = 458.64 (p < 0.001). In the factorial analysis with varimax rotation, two dimensions were defined. The “healthy habits” dimension was composed of five factors (ICC = 0.87 and α = 0.93) and the “cardiovascular risk factors” dimension was composed of seven factors (ICC = 0.83 and α = 0.91). In the individual factor analysis, Cronbach's alphas were between 0.93 and 0.91. Total variance was 46.87%. There were no significant differences between test and retest applications.ConclusionThe questionnaire presented satisfactory validity and reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility), allowing for its use in children.     

Duke Activity Status Index for Cardiovascular Diseases: Validation of the Portuguese Translation

Background

The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) assesses the functional capacity of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but there is no Portuguese version validated for CVD.

Objectives

To translate and adapt cross-culturally the DASI for the Portuguese-Brazil language, and to verify its psychometric properties in the assessment of functional capacity of patients with CVD.

Methods

The DASI was translated into Portuguese, then checked by back-translation into English and evaluated by an expert committee. The pre-test version was first evaluated in 30 subjects. The psychometric properties and correlation with exercise testing was performed in a second group of 67 subjects. An exploratory factor analyses was performed in all 97 subjects to verify the construct validity of the DASI.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.87 and for the inter-rater reliability was 0.84. Cronbach''s α for internal consistency was 0.93. The concurrent validity was verified by significant positive correlations of DASI scores with the VO₂max (r = 0.51, p < 0.001). The factor analysis yielded two factors, which explained 54% of the total variance, with factor 1 accounting for 40% of the variance. Application of the DASI required between one and three and a half minutes per patient.

Conclusions

The Brazilian version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable, fast and easy to administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients with CVD.     

Un changement de paradigme au sein du DSM ? Le cas de la personnalité borderline à l’adolescence

The diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder in adolescence has recently been included into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (1994) and clinical studies showed that this disorder could be diagnosed reliably with this definition. Although the legitimacy of its place in the DSM is questioned. While DSM nosological approach assume to ensure that psychiatric diagnoses are reliable, it appears that other determinants are decisive in the process of legitimation of this pathology. Indeed, international literature shows that borderline personality disorder in adolescence has a weak construct validity that questioned the validity of this diagnosis in the context of Evidence Based Medicine. For the first time, this argument leads to a possible withdrawal of the category in the next version of the DSM. Authors hypothesize that this could be analyzed as a paradigm shift in the DSM. The issue is no longer the reliability produced by the diagnosis in a “paradigm of objectivity,” but its construct validity in a “paradigm of validity.” This would result in an increased visibility of the diagnostic utility in the nosological categorization.     

Scoring accuracy of automated sleep staging from a bipolar electroocular recording compared to manual scoring by multiple raters

Objectives

Electroencephalography (EEG) assessment in research and clinical studies is limited by the patient burden of multiple electrodes and the time needed to manually score records. The objective of our study was to investigate the accuracy of an automated sleep-staging algorithm which is based on a single bipolar EEG signal.

Methods

Three raters each manually scored the polysomnographic (PSG) records from 44 patients referred for sleep evaluation. Twenty-one PSG records were scored by Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria (group 1) and 23 PSGs were scored by American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2007 criteria (group 2). Majority agreement was present in 98.4% of epochs and was used for comparison to automated scoring from a single EEG lead derived from the left and right electrooculogram.

Results

The κ coefficients for interrater manual scoring ranged from 0.46 to 0.89. The κ coefficient for the auto algorithm vs manual scoring by rater ranged from 0.42 to 0.63 and was 0.61 (group 1, κ = 0.61 and group 2, κ = 0.62) for majority agreement for all studies. The mean positive percent agreement across subjects and stages was 72.6%, approximately 80% for stages wake (78.3%), stage 2 sleep (N2) (80.9%), and stage 3 sleep (N3) (78.1%); the percentage slightly decreased to 73.2% for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and dropped to 31.9% for stage 1 sleep (N1). Differences in agreement were observed based on raters, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity, medications, and signal quality.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that automated scoring of sleep obtained from a single-channel of forehead EEG results in agreement to majority manual scoring are similar to results obtained from studies of manual interrater agreement. The benefit in assessing auto-staging accuracy with consensus agreement across multiple raters is most apparent in patients with OSA; additionally, assessing auto-staging accuracy limited disagreements in patients on medications and in those with compromised signal quality.