Benefits of medially based perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap in cartilage sparing prominent ear surgery

BackgroundCartilage-cutting and cartilage-sparing techniques are the two types of otoplasty procedures. Because of the significant risk of haematoma, skin necrosis, and ear deformity, cartilage-cutting techniques have been questioned. As a result; suture-based cartilage-sparing procedures such as Mustarde and Furnas suture procedures have grown in popularity. However, these techniques have a tendency for deformity recurrence due to cartilage memory and suture fatigue, as well as the possibility of suture extrusion and pinpricking sensation of the sutures.MethodsIn this study, we used a medially based adipo-dermal flap including perichondrium which is elevated from the back of the auricle to cover and support a cartilage-sparing otoplasty, thirty-four patients (14 female and 20 male) were operated using this technique. The medially based perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap is advanced anteriorly and fixed to the helical rim under cover of the distal skin flap. This procedure sought to cover the suture line preventing suture extrusion and support in the repair of the deformity preventing its recurrence.ResultsThe average operative time was 80 min, ranging from 65 to 110 min. The patients passed the early postoperative period uneventfully except for 2 patients; one patient (2.9%) developed haematoma, and the other patient developed a small area of necrosis on the new antihelical fold. In late the postoperative period recurrence of the deformity developed in one patient. No patients developed suture extrusion or granuloma.ConclusionThe treatment to repair prominent ears is easy and safe, with benefits such as a natural-looking antihelical fold and minimal tissue stress. The medially or proximally based adipo-dermal flap may help to lower recurrence rates and suture extrusion.     

Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction

ObjectiveVarious techniques have been described in the literature for prominent ear correction. These cartilage-preserving or cartilage-shaping techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. We aim to achieve aesthetic and stable results with low complication rates using combinations of these methods. Herein, we present our results of prominent ear surgery with a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap in combination with concha-mastoid and concha-scaphal sutures.MethodsPatients whose surgeries included a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear deformities were included in the study. Patients’ demographic data, pre- and postoperative Concha-Mastoid Angle (CMA) and upper-middle Helix-Mastoid Distances (HMD), follow-up time, complications, secondary operations, and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results were evaluated. With a postauricular fish-mouth incision, the bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap was planned into two: proximal- and distal-based. They were then elevated from the cartilage subperichondrially on the proximal side and supraperichondrially on the distal side. Concha-scaphal sutures were used to form an antihelical rim along with concha-mastoid sutures to reduce the concha-mastoid angle. Conchal cartilage resection was done if needed. Then, the bilateral fasciaperichondrial flaps were sutured together to cover the concha-mastoid and concha-scaphal sutures.ResultsBetween May 2017 and May 2021, 32 ears of 17 patients were operated on due to prominent ear deformity. No hematoma or infection was observed in any patient, and there were no instances of recurrence, suture exposure, hypertrophic scars, or keloids. The satisfaction level of all patients was 8.2 ± 0.9 points on average according to the VAS. In the anthropometric measurements, a statistically significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative sixth month CMA and HMD values.ConclusionA combination of suture techniques and a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap may be used in prominent ear cases, with low recurrence rates and high patient satisfaction.Level of evidenceIII.     

Quality of life after otoplasty for prominent ears in children

AimProminent ears are a common congenital malformation and are associated with low self-esteem, social isolation and diminished school performance. Our goal was to evaluate the influence of otoplasty on children’s quality of life (QoL).Material and methodsPatients submitted to otoplasty from 2016 to 2018 were summoned for a reevaluation. Seventy patients and respective caregivers agreed to participate. Surgical, demographic and clinical data were reviewed from electronic registries.Two sets of inquiries were performedPediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (for parent and child) and an adaptation of the Glasgow Children Benefit Inventory (GCBI-b). Fifteen patients were excluded for incomplete inquiries.ResultsFifty-five patients were included, 70.9% were males. Median age at surgery was 7.7 ± 3.3 years. Aesthetic dissatisfaction was the main previous negative experience. Median self-report quality of life was 85.6% and parent-report was 86.9%. Median GCBI-b was +20.5, indicating an improvement in patients’ QoL. Bullying and high parental expectations for life change post-surgery were predictive of higher GCBI-b scores (p < 0.05). Ninety-six percent of parents would recommend surgery to other children.ConclusionsOtoplasty is a valid treatment option for prominent ears in children,improving not only aesthetics but also health-related QoL.