Anatomical basis for the intrahepatic glissonian approach during hepatectomies

Background

Anatomical liver resections are based on some basic technical principles such as vascular control, ischemic area delineation to be resected and maximum parenchymal preservation. These aspects are achieved by the intrahepatic glissonian approach, which consists in accessing the pedicles of hepatic segments within the hepatic parenchyma. Small incisions on well-defined anatomical landmarks are performed to approach the pedicles, making dissection of the hilar plate unnecessary.

Aim

Analyze parameters in liver anatomy related to intrahepatic surgical technique to glissonians pedicles, to set the normal anatomy related to the procedure and thereby facilitate the attainment of this technique.

Methods

Anatomical parameters related to the intrahepatic glissonian approach were studied in 37 cadavers. Measurements were performed with precision instruments. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. The subjects were divided into groups according to gender and liver weight and groups were compared statistically.

Results

Twenty-five cadavers were male and 12 female. No statistically significant difference was observed in virtually all parameters when groups were compared. This demonstrates the consistency of the anatomical parameters related to the intrahepatic glissonian approach.

Conclusion

The results obtained in this study made possible major technical advances in the realization of open and laparoscopic hepatectomies with intrahepatic glissonian approach, and can help surgeons to perform liver resections by this method.     

Association between the Root Canal Configuration,Endodontic Treatment Technical Errors,and Periapical Hypodensities in Molar Teeth: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study

IntroductionThis study aimed to evaluate the association between the root canal configuration (RCC), endodontic technical errors, and periapical hypodensities in molars using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images.MethodsTwo hundred twenty-one roots were assessed from 79 patients referred for CBCT examination because of symptomatology in endodontically treated molars. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists classified the RCC of each dental root according to Vertucci's classification. Root canals were assessed for the presence of technical errors from endodontic treatment. The presence of periapical hypodensity for each dental root and the coronal sealing condition of each tooth were also recorded.ResultsFor RCC type I, the most prevalent technical error was underfilling (17.4%). For types II and VIII, nonfilled canals were found in 54% and 100% of the cases, respectively. For type III, underfilling, nonhomogeneous filling, and nonfilled canals were equally frequent (33.3%), whereas for type IV underfilling and nonfilled canals had a prevalence of 42%. In general, there was a higher prevalence of apical hypodensities among roots with technical errors. It was also observed for type I, with an increase from 41.2%–62.9% when a technical error was present.ConclusionsThe prevalence of different endodontic technical errors varies depending on the RCC for molars. A greater complexity of RCC is related to a higher occurrence of errors and a higher prevalence of periapical hypodensity.