国产盐酸氯普鲁卡因临床效应分析

目的 分析研究国产盐酸氯普卡因冻干粉与针剂分别应用于硬膜外麻醉、臂丛神经阻滞、局部浸润麻醉的效果。方法 采用随机双盲目的方法分组进行研究。硬膜外麻醉45例,分为3组（每组15例）：Ⅰ组1．7％利多卡因,Ⅱ组氯普鲁卡因粉剂稀释为3％,Ⅲ组3％氯普鲁卡因针剂;臂丛神经阻滞40例,分为4组（每组10例）;I组1．33％利多卡因,Ⅱ组2％普鲁卡因,Ⅲ组氯普鲁卡因粉剂稀释为2％,Ⅳ组2％氯普鲁卡因针刺;局部浸润麻醉30例（每例10例）分为3组：Ⅰ组1％普鲁卡因,Ⅱ组氯普鲁卡因粉剂稀释为1％,Ⅲ组1％氯普鲁卡因针剂。结果 硬膜外组中除Ⅲ组运动消失时间明显短于Ⅰ组外（P＜0．05）,其余指标无明显统计学差异;臂全神经阻滞组中,实验组疼痛恢复及运动恢复时间少于对照组I组,有统计学差异（P＜0．01）,实验组Ⅲ组疼痛及运动恢复时间均比对照组Ⅱ组长（P＜0．05）;局部浸润麻醉组中两实验组疼痛消失迅速,疼痛恢复时间均长于对照组,Ⅲ组短于Ⅱ组。结论 国产盐酸氯普鲁卡因麻醉起效迅速,性能稳定,粉剂比针剂更佳;作用维持时间介于盐酸普鲁卡因与利多卡因之间。     

恩丹西酮预防椎管内阻滞后寒战的效果

①目的观察麻醉前静脉注射恩丹西酮预防椎管内阻滞后寒战的效果和对腋温的影响.②方法选择腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下行经腹全子宫切除术病人160例,随机分为两组,实验组(n=80)麻醉前静脉注射恩丹西酮8mg;对照组(n=80)麻醉前静脉注射生理盐水4mL,观察两组术中平均动脉压、心率、腋温变化和寒战发生情况.③结果实验组8例出现寒战(10.0%),对照组26例出现寒战(32.5%),两组比较差异有显著性(x2=7.05,P＜0.01).两组平均动脉压、心率、腋温变化差异无显著性(t=0.14～1.71,P均＞0.05).④结论恩丹西酮可预防椎管内阻滞后寒战的发生,但对腋温无影响.     

Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence,Risk Factors,and Results Over 25 Years

BackgroundAcquired idiopathic stiffness (AIS) remains a common failure mode of contemporary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The present study investigated the incidence of AIS and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) at a single institution over time, determined outcomes of MUAs, and identified risk factors associated with AIS and MUA.MethodsWe identified 9771 patients (12,735 knees) who underwent primary TKAs with cemented, modular metal-backed, posterior-stabilized implants from 2000 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry. Mean age was 68 years, 57% were female, and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m². Demographic, surgical, and comorbidity data were investigated via univariate Cox proportional hazard models and fit to an adjusted multivariate model to access risk for AIS and MUA. Mean follow-up was 7 years.ResultsDuring the study period, 456 knees (3.6%) developed AIS and 336 knees (2.6%) underwent MUA. Range of motion (ROM) increased a mean of 34° after the MUA; however, ROM for patients treated with MUA was inferior to patients without AIS at final follow-up (102° vs 116°, P < .0001). Significant risk factors included younger age (HR 2.3, P < .001), increased tourniquet time (HR 1.01, P < .001), general anesthesia (HR 1.3, P = .007), and diabetes (HR 1.5, P = .001).ConclusionAcquired idiopathic stiffness has continued to have an important adverse impact on the outcomes of a subset of patients undergoing primary TKAs. When utilized, MUA improved mean ROM by 34°, but patients treated with MUA still had decreased ROM compared to patients without AIS. Importantly, we identified several significant risk factors associated with AIS and subsequent MUA.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Impact of Dexamethasone on Length of Stay and Early Pain Control in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Neuraxial Anesthesia

BackgroundDexamethasone has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption for total joint arthroplasty patients; however, its impact on patients who received neuraxial anesthesia (NA) is not well described. We examined the impact of perioperative dexamethasone on outcomes for patients undergoing direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) under NA.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted for 376 THA patients from a single institution. Univariate analysis was used to compare postoperative outcomes for 164 THA patients receiving dexamethasone compared to 212 who did not receive dexamethasone.ResultsNo differences in age, gender, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score were observed between the groups. Patients receiving perioperative dexamethasone reported statistically significantly lower postanesthesia care unit (PACU) pain numeric rating scale (Dexamethasone 1.6 vs No dexamethasone 2.3, P = .014) and received lower PACU morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (Dexamethasone 8.57 vs No dexamethasone 11.44, P < .001). Patients receiving dexamethasone had significantly shorter LOS (Dexamethasone 29.40 vs No dexamethasone 35.26 hrs., P < .001).ConclusionPerioperative dexamethasone is associated with decreased postoperative pain and narcotic consumption, and shorter length of stay for patients undergoing primary direct anterior approach THA with NA.     

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Adductor Canal Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to determine the benefit of the analgesic liposomal bupivacaine compared to ropivacaine, by assessing pain and joint stiffness, and total oral opioid consumption by milligram morphine equivalent (MME) after total knee arthroplasty.MethodsPatients were randomized to receive either the study drug (liposomal bupivacaine admixed with bupivacaine) or the control drug (ropivacaine) in an adductor canal block. Only the anesthesiologist performing the block was aware of which arm of the study the patient was randomized to. MME, pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and overall benefit of analgesia scores were recorded 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery either face-to-face or via telephone depending on patient discharge status.ResultsOne hundred patients were enrolled into the study and analyzed: 54 in the control group and 46 in the experimental group. Primary outcomes measured were pain as a numerical rating scale, MME, and length of stay in hours. Secondary outcomes were joint pain and stiffness recorded as Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement outcome and overall benefit of analgesia score. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for any measured outcome.ConclusionWe did not find any supporting evidence that liposomal bupivacaine yields increased pain relief following total knee arthroplasty compared to the control drug, ropivacaine.     

Vía clínica de recuperación intensificada en cirugía cardiaca. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología,Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR), la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Endovascular (SECCE) y la Asociación Española de Perfusionistas (AEP)

The ERAS guidelines are intended to identify, disseminate and promote the implementation of the best, scientific evidence-based actions to decrease variability in clinical practice. The implementation of these practices in the global clinical process will promote better outcomes and the shortening of hospital and critical care unit stays, thereby resulting in a reduction in costs and in greater efficiency. After completing a systematic review at each of the points of the perioperative process in cardiac surgery, recommendations have been developed based on the best scientific evidence currently available with the consensus of the scientific societies involved.     

Bloqueo del plano del músculo erector de la columna para analgesia de dolor lumbar crónico: serie de casos

BackgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a frequent condition, poorly managed with conventional treatments. The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block has increasingly been used in the management of acute and chronic pain. We aimed to determine this technique's analgesic efficacy in patients with moderate to severe CLBP.MethodsTen consecutively selected patients: adults, regularly followed in our Pain Clinic with moderate/severe long-term CLBP refractory to pharmacological treatment, VAS > 4. Prospective data collection: before the intervention –demographical data, past medical history, current pain therapies, VAS pain level, Brief Pain Inventory– Short Form and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire; 30 minutes after – VAS and satisfaction level; 24 and 72 hours, 7 days and 1 month after - complications and pain level.ResultsMajority of females (90%), mean age of 70.3 years-old. All had primary musculoskeletal CLBP. 90% experienced severe pain (VAS > = 7) in the last 24 hours. Half presented neuropathic characteristics. Patients were very satisfied with the technique (mean: 8.75) with immediate pain relief (VAS mean: 2.3). 24 and 72 hours, 7 days and 1 month after the treatment VAS means were 3.2, 3.1, 3.8 and 6.2. We report a 20.8 days duration mean. No short or long-term complications.Discussion and conclusionsUltrasound-guided erector spinae plane block has preliminary advantages in CLBP: easily performed with low complications risk, immediate discharge home with absence of motor block, 100% efficacy at short and medium-terms. Even though pain's relief was shorter than a month, it is a useful tool allowing patients’ well-being, physical rehabilitation and exercise during this period.     

Effect of QT interval prolongation on cardiac arrest following liver transplantation and derivation of a risk index

Liver transplantation (LT) has a 4-fold higher risk of periprocedural cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmias (CA/VAs) compared with other noncardiac surgeries. Prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) is common in patients with liver cirrhosis. Whether it is associated with an increased risk of CA/VAs following LT is unclear. Rates of 30-day CA/VAs post-LT were assessed in consecutive adults undergoing LT between 2010 and 2017. Pretransplant QTc was measured by a cardiologist blinded to clinical outcomes. Among 408 patients included, CA/VAs occurred in 26 patients (6.4%). QTc was significantly longer in CA/VA patients (475 ± 34 vs 450 ± 34 ms, P < .001). Optimal QTc cut-off for prediction of CA/VAs was ≥480 ms. After adjustment, QTc ≥480 ms remained the strongest predictor for the occurrence of CA/VAs (odds ratio [OR] 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-12.6). A point-based cardiac arrest risk index (CARI) was derived with the bootstrap method for yielding optimism-corrected coefficients (2 points: QTc ≥480, 1 point: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] ≥30, 1 point: age ≥65, and 1 point: male). CARI score ≥3 demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 0.79, optimism-corrected c-statistic 0.77) with appropriate calibration. QTc ≥480 ms was associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk of CA/VAs. The CARI score may identify patients at higher risk of these events. Whether heightened perioperative cardiac surveillance, avoidance of QT prolonging medications, or beta blockers could mitigate the risk of CA/VAs in this population merits further study.     

When laparoscopy for fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment of an anterior mediastinal mass is a dilemma: A case report

IntroductionThe management of anterior mediastinal masses is a challenge for anesthesiologists. Recommendations for their management in the context of diagnostic or curative surgery are well described. The added risk of laparoscopic surgery for fertility preservation has however never been discussed in the literature.Presentation of caseWe present the case of a 32-year-old female patient with a large malignant anterior mediastinal mass. She was referred for anesthesia evaluation before laparoscopic ovarian tissue harvesting as part of fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment. The patient presented dyspnea at rest. Chest computed tomography revealed a tracheal deviation and a partial obstruction of the left mainstem bronchus. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a pericardial effusion. Proceeding to high risk anesthesia for a non-curative surgery in a patient with a highly symptomatic mass was considered unacceptable and the procedure was postponed. The patient received a single cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical and radiological improvement were shown after this single dose and laparoscopic surgery was performed under general anesthesia without complications.ConclusionIn the context of an anterior mediastinal mass and fertility preservation a thorough benefit-risk analysis must be undertaken before non-curative laparoscopic surgery. In case of severe symptoms, surgery should be postponed until the patient’s condition improves after the minimum necessary chemotherapy treatment. So far it is impossible to say whether the risk exceeds the expected benefit in this difficult situation. Further studies need to be conducted in this area.