Corrosion in modular total hip replacements: An analysis of the head–neck and stem–sleeve taper connections

In this retrieval study, modular junctions of retrieved S-ROM^® implants were examined to determine the extent of corrosion at the head–neck and stem–sleeve junctions. Corrosion severity was graded in relation to the bearing surface material over time. It was found that the corrosion at the head–neck taper is greater for cobalt–chrome femoral heads compared to ceramic femoral heads. The stem–sleeve junction had significantly more corrosion damage (p < 0.05) in implants that had hard-on-hard bearing surfaces compared to hard-on-soft bearings. This study suggests that bearing surface materials and head size affect the amount of corrosion that is present at the modular junctions.     

Inducible displacements of the cup and the femoral head during active range of motion: Dynamic RSA studies of cemented total hip replacements

We evaluated changes in position of the femoral head relative to the cup and of the cup relative to the pelvis in total hip replacement patients during hip motion 2 years postoperatively. Two patient groups with nine patients in each group were studied. Hip motions, translations of the femoral head center, and cup displacements were recorded with dynamic radiostereometric examination (RSA, 2 exposures/s) during abduction in Group 1 and with use of static RSA exposures at increasing flexion of the hip in Group 2. Conventional radiographic examinations were used to evaluate any radiolucent lines around the cups at 2 years. During active abduction the femoral head center moved medially (median 0.04 mm) and the cup tilted anteriorly (median 0.09 mm). Increments in radiolucent lines at 2 years correlated to medial femoral head penetration, posterior tilt, and retroversion of the cup at 20° of abduction. The extension of radiolucent lines at 2 years showed a positive correlation with proximal inducible displacement of the cup and posterior translation of the femoral head center at maximum hip flexion. Our observations may be of value in understanding the pathogenesis of the loosening process and may be used to facilitate the development of prosthetic designs that optimize hip kinematics. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1686–1693, 2013     

Impingement and stability of total hip arthroplasty versus femoral head resurfacing using a cadaveric robotics model

We identified and compared the impingent‐free range of motion (ROM) and subluxation potential for native hip, femoral head resurfacing (FHR), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). These constructs were also compared both with and without soft tissue to elucidate the role of the soft tissue. Five fresh‐frozen bilateral hip specimens were mounted to a six‐degree of freedom robotic manipulator. Under load‐control parameters, in vivo mechanics were recreated to evaluate impingement free ROM, and the subluxation potential in two “at risk” positions for native hip, FHR, and THA. Impingement‐free ROM of the skeletonized THA was greater than FHR for the anterior subluxation position. For skeletonized posterior subluxations, stability for THA and FHR constructs were similar, while a different pattern was observed for specimens with soft tissues intact. FHR constructs were more stable than THA constructs for both anterior and posterior subluxations. When the femoral neck is intact the joint has an earlier impingement profile placing the hip at risk for subluxation. However, FHR design was shown to be more stable than THA only when soft tissues were intact. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1108–1115, 2013