穿支皮瓣修复口腔颌面-头颈部缺损专家共识

穿支皮瓣由皮肤穿支血管供血,是常用的组织缺损修复形式,但头颈部解剖复杂、缺损形式多样以及穿支血管解剖变异等,阻碍了穿支皮瓣在口腔颌面-头颈部缺损修复中的进一步应用。迄今为止,国内外对于穿支皮瓣修复口腔颌面-头颈部缺损临床应用缺少相关治疗指南,穿支血管的术前评价缺乏统一标准,穿支皮瓣的应用设计缺乏科学的规范,穿支皮瓣修复术后缺少客观的监测和评价体系。为进一步统一和规范穿支皮瓣在口腔颌面-头颈部缺损修复中的应用,提高重建效果,本共识总结全国多家著名医学院校及附属医院口腔颌面外科专家团队的实践经验,供临床医师参考。     

基于临床治疗指南及共识的使用华法林住院患者用药分析与评价

目的：对某院使用华法林的住院患者进行用药分析和评价,并对其出院后复诊情况进行追踪,以更好地发挥华法林的治疗作用,减少不良反应的发生。方法：采用回顾性的分析方法,对某院2018年7月-12月使用华法林的住院患者用药进行分析,结合指南、共识对其用药情况进行分析评价。结果：共调取509份病例,华法林的使用主要分布于心血管内科、心血管外科、呼吸内科。华法林应用临床诊断主要为肺栓塞、心房颤动、肺动脉高压、静脉血栓等;住院患者华法林用量范围为0.625~9 mg,平均日剂量（2.99±1.11）mg;全院服用华法林后INR总体测定率为79%,将INR值以"<2.0"、"2.0~3.0"、">3.0"分布进行统计,INR2.0~3.0占比为33.17%,最高的为呼吸内科。26例（5.11%）患者住院期间INR达到4.5~10.0,38.46%使用维生素K进行拮抗;2例（0.39%）患者INR大于10,全部使用维生素K进行拮抗。在院期间合用其他抗凝药中,低分子肝素使用率最高的为骨外科,心血管外科,心血管内科;普通肝素使用率最高的为呼吸内科;阿加曲班使用率最高的为神经内科;利伐沙班使用率最高的为心血管内科,根据相关指南共识分析用药基本合理。患者出院后一周内及总复诊率最高的均为呼吸内科。复诊后INR分布在2.0~3.0占比最高的也为呼吸内科,与呼吸科临床药师药学监护及用药教育相关。结论：目前华法林临床应用仍不够规范,INR达标率偏低,出院后复诊率较低,抗凝药物转换过程中有不规范的问题,积极开展药师药学监护、用药教育及随访具有重要意义。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎临床合理用药专家共识

新型冠状病毒肺炎（coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19）疫情发生以来,全国医院药学工作者坚持医药协同,在保障药品供应的前提下,积极参与临床救治工作,加强对患者的用药教育和指导,有效提高药物治疗水平,改善临床救治效果。为更好地发挥药学服务在COVID-19疫情防控中的重要作用,中国药学会医院药学专业委员会特组织临床和药学专家,在《新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎诊疗方案（试行第七版）》的基础上,参考国内外最新的诊疗方案和研究成果,并结合国内各地COVID-19患者的救治经验,制定出新型冠状病毒肺炎临床合理用药专家共识。本共识详细阐述COVID-19临床救治的九类用药,内容涵盖药物治疗作用、遴选原则、用法用量、不良反应及注意事项,以期为COVID-19临床用药提供参考。     

中国头颈黏膜黑色素瘤临床诊治专家共识

我国恶性黑色素瘤的发病率较欧美发达地区低,2009年上海市恶性黑色素瘤的发病率约为0.42/10万.但是由于我国人口基数大,因此临床上恶性黑色素瘤人数众多.2009年、2011年已经发布了2版《中国黑色素瘤诊治指南》,主要针对皮肤恶性黑色素瘤.在我国,黏膜恶性黑色素瘤是最常见的类型之一,但对黏膜恶性黑色素瘤的研究较少.而黏膜黑色素瘤的治疗手段和预后与皮肤黑色素瘤有许多不同.因此,制订符合我国国情的黏膜恶性黑色素瘤临床实践共识非常必要.     

Australian consensus guidelines for the safe handling of monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment by healthcare personnel

These consensus guidelines provide recommendations for the safe handling of monoclonal antibodies. Definitive recommendations are given for the minimum safe handling requirements to protect healthcare personnel. The seven recommendations cover: (i) appropriate determinants for evaluating occupational exposure risk; (ii) occupational risk level compared with other hazardous and non‐hazardous drugs; (iii) stratification of risk based on healthcare personnel factors; (iv) waste products; (v) interventions and safeguards; (vi) operational and clinical factors and (vii) handling recommendations. The seventh recommendation includes a risk assessment model and flow chart for institutions to consider and evaluate clinical and operational factors unique to individual healthcare services. These guidelines specifically evaluated monoclonal antibodies used in the Australian cancer clinical practice setting; however, the principles may be applicable to monoclonal antibodies used in non‐cancer settings. The guidelines are only applicable to parenterally administered agents.     

Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs

Background

Medication error is an important contributor to patient morbidity and mortality and is associated with inadequate patient safety measures. However, prescribing-safety tools specifically designed for use in general practice are lacking.

Aim

To identify and update a set of prescribing-safety indicators for assessing the safety of prescribing in general practice, and to estimate the risk of harm to patients associated with each indicator.

Design and setting

RAND/UCLA consensus development of indicators in UK general practice.

Method

Prescribing indicators were identified from a systematic review and previous consensus exercise. The RAND Appropriateness Method was used to further identify and develop the indicators with an electronic-Delphi method used to rate the risk associated with them. Twelve GPs from all the countries of the UK participated in the RAND exercise, with 11 GPs rating risk using the electronic-Delphi approach.

Results

Fifty-six prescribing-safety indicators were considered appropriate for inclusion (overall panel median rating of 7–9, with agreement). These indicators cover hazardous prescribing across a range of therapeutic indications, hazardous drug–drug combinations and inadequate laboratory test monitoring. Twenty-three (41%) of these indicators were considered high risk or extreme risk by 80% or more of the participants.

Conclusion

This study identified a set of 56 indicators that were considered, by a panel of GPs, to be appropriate for assessing the safety of GP prescribing. Twenty-three of these indicators were considered to be associated with high or extreme risk to patients and should be the focus of efforts to improve patient safety.     

基层医疗卫生机构新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控常态化工作存在的问题和对策建议

在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控中,基层医疗卫生机构对社区疫情防控和防疫关口前移发挥重要作用,是外防输入、内防扩散的最有效防线。在面对当下乃至未来较长一段时间内存在的新型冠状病毒感染局部暴发或区域性流行的情况下,基层医疗卫生机构需要把防疫工作常态化,及时补足重大疫情防控中的短板,包括环境建设欠规范、应急物资储备不足、制度建设流于形式、基层医疗卫生应急能力不足等。建议改善基层医疗卫生机构场地环境、完善制度、提升基层应急能力,重视基层医疗卫生工作者的劳动价值并建立有效激励措施,以利于基层医疗卫生机构持久战疫。