High-flow priapism due to bilateral cavernous artery fistulas treated by unilateral embolization: A case report

BACKGROUNDHigh flow priapism (HFP) is a rare type of priapism. Perineal trauma is the most common cause of HFP. Trauma-induced penile artery injury may lead to an arterial-cavernosal fistula, whereas persistent irregular arterial blood flow entering the corpora cavernosum can cause a persistent penile erection. The routine treatment of HFP focuses on addressing the abnormal penile erectile status and avoiding post-treatment erectile dysfunction. Interventional embolization is an important therapeutic modality for HFP, and bilateral embolization therapy is currently the most commonly used technique for patients with bilateral cavernous artery fistulas; however, unilateral embolization therapy has yet to be reported.CASE SUMMARYHerein, we report of the case of a 26-year-old Chinese male who presented with a persistent abnormal erection for 12 h after perineal impact injury. Medical history, cavernous arterial blood gas analysis and radiological examinations led to a diagnosis of HFP caused by bilateral cavernous artery fistulas. We performed routine conservative treatment (compression therapy and ice application) for the patient after admission; however, 10 d later, his symptoms had not been relieved. After completion of the preoperative workup, right (severe side) selective perineal artery embolization was performed; the left cavernous artery fistula was left untreated. After postoperative continuation of conservative treatment for 72 h, the patient experienced complete penile thinning. The patient had no symptoms of erectile dysfunction over a follow-up period of 12 mo.CONCLUSIONCompared with bilateral cavernous artery fistula embolization, we believe that unilateral cavernous artery fistula embolization can achieve positive clinical efficacy and reduce the risk of postoperative erectile dysfunction secondary to penile ischemia.     

The use of the independent sector in providing NHS services during the Covid-19 outbreak; two hospitals experience

This paper reviews the activity undertaken between a teaching hospital and its adjacent Independent Hospital and its implementation under the Independent Sector Provider Contract between NHSE and the Independent Sector.ResultsFrom the instigation of the NHSE contract with the Independent Sector up until 28th June 2020 The Norfolk and Norwich University NHS Trust (NNUH) delivered 9016 episodes of care including 576 surgical episodes at its nearby Independent Hospital. During the time that a seven day household isolation period was required, no patients from the 31 tested postoperatively were recorded as testing positive for Covid-19. In the month after moving to a mandatory 14 day period of household isolation, 29 patients had their surgery postponed as they were unable to comply with the required period of isolation.ConclusionWorking cooperatively with the independent sector can deliver significant additional capacity for the NHS. Fourteen days household isolation may impact on a patient's decision to have surgery, despite, in some cases, that surgery being time-sensitive. The recommendation from NICE reducing the length of isolation largely reversed this impact.     

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with obesity undergoing bariatric care

BackgroundPatients with obesity are at increased risk of developing severe COVID-19. The pandemic has caused delays in preoperative preparation, progression, and completion of bariatric surgeries.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on bariatric surgery patients and assess their concern of COVID-19 as they continue the preoperative process.SettingPhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaMethodsA questionnaire was administered to patients to assess the impact of COVID-19 on their weight loss goals, physical activity, and diet. Time points assessed were initial bariatric consultation (T1), as well as the beginning (T2), and the end (T3) of lockdown restrictions in the region.ResultsSeventy-four participants were invited and 50 completed the survey, for a response rate of 67.6%. The average age of participants was 44.1 years. Two-thirds of patients reported significant concern that COVID-19 would affect their weight loss goals. Patients reported significant improvements in their diet from T1 to T2 (P < .01). However, at T3, some patients returned to behaviors held at T1, with snacking behaviors significantly increasing between T2 and T3 (P < .01). Physical activity decreased in 60% of patients between T2 to T3. The vast majority (90%) wanted to have their surgery as soon as possible; 56% reported low levels of concern for COVID-19 infection.ConclusionBariatric patients were highly motivated to proceed with bariatric surgery despite the risks imposed by the pandemic.     

Pain and function deteriorate in patients awaiting total joint arthroplasty that has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUNDElective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures have been postponed as part of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response to avert healthcare system collapse. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures comprise the highest volume of elective procedures performed at health care facilities worldwide.AIMTo determine the demand for TJA despite the pandemic and the impact of surgery postponement on physical and mental health.METHODSWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional telephonic interview-based study on patients awaiting THA and TKA at an academic institution in South Africa. The questionnaire consisted of four sections. The first section recorded baseline demographic data and medical co-morbidities, the length of time spent awaiting TJA, and the patients’ desire to undergo elective surgery despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Section 2 and Section 3 assessed the patients’ current physical and mental health, respectively, as a consequence of deferred surgical intervention. The last section established the patients’ perception of the healthcare system’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and necessity to postpone elective surgery. Patients received counseling and education on the current state of surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated risks. Thereafter, patients were once again asked about their desire to undergo TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic.RESULTSWe included 185 patients (65.95% female; mean age: 50.28 years) awaiting TJA for a mean of 26.42 ± 30.1 mo. Overall, 88.65% of patients wanted TJA despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients awaiting TJA for 1-3 years were 3.3-fold more likely to want surgery than those waiting < 1 year (P < 0.000). Patients with comorbidities were 8.4-fold less likely to want TJA than those with no comorbidities (P = 0.013). After receiving education, the patients wanting TJA decreased to 54.05%. Patients who changed their opinion after education had less insight on the increased morbidity (P = 0.046) and mortality (P = 0.001) associated with COVID-19. Despite awaiting TJA for shorter period (24.7 ± 20.38 mo), patients who continued to demand TJA had greater pain (P < 0.000) and decreased function (P = 0.043) since TJA postponement.CONCLUSIONThere is deterioration in health for patients, who have had elective procedures postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Waiting lists should be prioritized for urgency with the re-initiation of elective surgery.     

PROMs in total knee replacement: analysis of negative outcomes

IntroductionNHS England uses the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) as part of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate ‘health gains’ following total knee replacement. Policy makers use this to guide healthcare funding and resource allocation. Our study aims to undertake a qualitative and quantitative analysis of OKS among patients who experienced a negative outcome after a total knee replacement at our centre.Materials and methodsBetween April 2017-March 2018, 19 of 189 (10%) patients had a worsened OKS at our centre. We retrospectively and prospectively reviewed 14 of these patients. Structured telephone interviews with a repeat OKS were carried out in September 2019 (18–29 months post-operation).ResultsEight patients were female and the total age range was 57–95, mean average 75.6 (SD 9.9 years). Of 48 (higher scores meaning better outcomes), the average preoperative OKS was 24.2 and the average postoperative OKS at 6 months was 19.4 (decrease of 20%). The average postoperative OKS at 18–29 months was 35.6 (an increase of 83.5% from 6 months).DiscussionThe OKS was developed and validated over 20 years ago in Oxford. In our study, four patients asked for clarification of questions 4, 6 and 10 owing to ambiguous language. All 14 patients who had negative OKS outcomes had positive outcomes when retested after 18 months, depicting ‘health gains’ not conveyed in PROMs analysis.ConclusionThe OKS needs to be revalidated on current patient groups for accurate and reliable data. Further prospective studies should be undertaken on larger cohorts to understand the recovery course and whether PROMs should be carried out later.     

Should an elective contralateral neck dissection be performed in midline-reaching squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx?

Objectiveto compare the rate of occult contralateral neck metastases (OCNM) in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) reaching or crossing the midline and to identify risk factors for OCNM.Materials and methodswe conducted a single-center retrospective study of oral and oropharyngeal SCC with contralateral cN0 neck. The cohort was divided into a midline-reaching (MR; approaching the midline from up to 10 mm) group and a midline-crossing (MC; exceeding the midline by up to 10 mm) group. Clinical N-status was assessed by a radiologist specializing in head and neck imaging. All patients underwent contralateral elective neck dissection (END).ResultsA total of 98 patients were included in this study, 59 in the MR group and 39 in the MC group. OCNM were present in 17.3% of patients, 20.3% in the MR group and 12.8% in the MC group (p = 0.336). In multivariable analysis, MR/MC status as well as distance from the midline (in mm) were not identified as risk factors for OCNM. Conversely, oropharyngeal primary and clinical N-status above N1 were significantly associated with a higher risk of OCNM, with odds ratios (OR) of 3.98 (95% CI = 1.08–14.60; p = 0.037) and 3.41 (95% CI = 1.07–10.85; p = 0.038) respectively.Conclusionin patients with oral and oropharyngeal SCC extending close to or beyond the midline, tumor origin and clinical N-status should carry the most weight when dictating the indications for contralateral END, rather than the midline involvement in itself.     

Overcoming mutism in adults with learning disabilities: a case study

The literature review looks at the range of studies on people with selective mutism, with special emphasis on the field of learning disabilities. It finds three particular references ( Labbe & Williamson 1984 ; Paniagua & Saeed 1988 ; Cline & Baldwin 1994b ) that may be particularly pertinent to those people who appear to reduce their speech progressively over time in terms of both quantity of utterances and also who reduce the number of people to whom they will speak. This paper then considers the case of a woman of 36 years of age with Down's syndrome who had shown selective mutism for over 14 years, although this had become almost complete mutism for the last 8 years. The case was assessed and the woman was asked if she would be willing to participate in an attempt to reinforce communication and to gradually increase the number of words whispered or spoken in the presence of one person at first – the first author. Nonaversive behavioural methods were used and response initiation procedures were developed. Later, generalization of vocalizations to other people in other environments was encouraged. Sessions were carried out three times a week for about 2 months with rapid success. The woman's quality of life at home and her social interactions at the resource centre were also reported to have improved.