Association of musculoskeletal pain,fear-avoidance factors,and quality of life in active manual wheelchair users with SCI: A pilot study

Objective: Limited evidence examines the association of psychological factors, such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing, with musculoskeletal pain patterns in active manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study investigated the relationship among musculoskeletal pain, fear avoidance factors, quality of life (QoL), activity and duration of injury in individuals with SCI.

Design: Cross-sectional correlational.

Setting: Community setting.

Participants: Twenty-six individuals with SCI (age?=?42?±?14 years, duration manual wheelchair use?=?17?±?13 years, work/school/volunteer hours/week?=?31?±?14; recreation/sports hours/week 10?±?12).

Outcome Measures: Demographics and self-report measures including the Musculoskeletal Pain Survey (MPS), Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Fear of Pain (FPQ), Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQoL), and the Social Interaction Inventory (SII). Spearman’s rho (ρ) assessed correlation among measures.

Results: Strong association existed between age and duration of injury (ρ?=?0.66, P?<?0.001). SQoL offered a strong, direct correlation with age (ρ?=?0.63, P?=?0.01), duration of injury (ρ?=?0.70, P?=?0.001), and strong, inverse relationship with MPStotal (ρ?=??0.66, P?=?0.003) and MPS shoulder subscore (ρ?=??0.64, P?=?0.004). WUSPI demonstrated strong, inverse association with self-reported work hours (ρ?=??0.52, P?=?0.02) and a strong, direct relationship to PCS (ρ?=?0.79, P?=?<0001). PCS demonstrated a strong, inverse relationship to work/school/volunteer hours (ρ?=?0.71, P?<?0.001) and strong association to TSK-11_total (ρ?=?0.61, P?=?0.001). A moderate, inverse relationship was identified for recreational/sports hours and FPQ (ρ?=?0.48, P?=?0.03).

Conclusion: This cyclical relationship of musculoskeletal pain, reduced activity, and maladaptive psychological factors allude to interdependence of factors, supporting the multidisciplinary approach to care.     

Mental defeat is linked to interference,distress and disability in chronic pain

Mental defeat is a psychological construct that has recently been applied to characterize the experience of chronic pain. Elevated levels of mental defeat have been identified in patients with chronic pain, and while its presence distinguishes treatment seeking from non-treatment seeking individuals, the link between mental defeat and disability in chronic pain is yet to be established. The current study investigated the extent to which mental defeat is associated with pain-related interference, distress and disability. A total of 133 participants completed the Pain Self Perception Scale that assessed mental defeat in relation to pain. Moreover, the participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires that measured pain interference, distress, disability and other demographic (age, body mass index), clinical (pain intensity) and psychological (catastrophizing, worry, rumination and health anxiety) predictors of disability. Mental defeat was found to be strongly correlated with pain interference, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, functional disability and psychosocial disability. These correlations remained significant even when pain intensity and demographic variables were partialled out. Relative to chronic pain patients with lower levels of mental defeat, those with higher levels of mental defeat reported greater degree of pain interference, distress and disability. In a series of regression analyses, mental defeat emerged as the strongest predictor of pain interference, depression and psychosocial disability, whereas catastrophizing was the best predictor of sleep interference, anxiety and functional disability. These findings suggest that mental defeat may be an important mediator of distress and disability in chronic pain. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.     

Sex differences in adolescent chronic pain and pain-related coping

Sex differences exist in pain and the strategies used to cope with pain. Although it is has been proposed that such differences become apparent around puberty, somewhat surprisingly very little research has specifically investigated sex as a moderator of pain within adolescents. The primary aim of the current study was to investigate sex differences in pain and coping within a group of 46 male and 115 female adolescent chronic pain sufferers. All were aged between 11 and 19 years and had been referred to the Pain Management Unit at the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, United Kingdom. Patients completed a battery of measures including pain experiences and a pain coping questionnaire. No sex differences were found in pain chronicity, although males and females did differ in self-reported pain experiences (females reported higher pain). Sex differences were also found in coping behaviours. Females used more social support, positive statements and internalizing/catastrophizing, whereas males reported engaging in more behavioural distraction. Of these strategies internalizing/catastrophizing was found to mediate the relationship between sex and pain. This suggests that not only do sex differences exist in the pain experiences and pain-coping strategies of adolescents with chronic pain, but that internalizing/catastrophizing may be an important mechanism in understanding such differences. More research examining potential sex differences in children and adolescents is recommended.     

The relation between catastrophizing and the communication of pain experience

The Communal Coping Model of pain catastrophizing proposes that pain catastrophizers enact pain behaviors in order to solicit support or empathy from their social environment. By this account, pain catastrophizers might be expected to engage in behavior aimed at maximizing the probability that their pain will be perceived by others in their social environment. To test this prediction, 40 undergraduates were videotaped during a cold pressor procedure. A separate sample of 20 (10 men, 10 women) undergraduates were asked to view the video sequences and infer the pain ratings of the cold pressor participants. Correlational analyses revealed that higher levels of pain catastrophizing of the cold pressor participants were associated with observer inferences of more intense pain, r=.39, p<.01. The relation between cold pressor participants' level of pain catastrophizing and observer inferences of pain intensity was mediated by the cold pressor participants' pain behavior. Although pain catastrophizing was associated with observers' inferences of more intense pain, cold pressor participants' level of pain catastrophizing was not associated with observers' accuracy in inferring self-reported pain. Implications of the findings for theory and clinical practice are addressed.     

High pain catastrophizing scores in one-fourth of patients on biotherapy for spondylarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectivesTo measure catastrophizing scores in patients on biotherapy for spondyloarthritis (SpA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThe first 140 outpatients or day-hospital patients seen at a teaching hospital rheumatology department for biotherapy administration completed the validated French version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS, total score ranging from 0 to 52); a questionnaire on perceived support and past, current, and future disease activity; and a questionnaire on perceived understanding of their disease by family and co-workers.ResultsPCS scores were significantly higher in the 54 SpA patients than in the 86 RA patients (20.8 ± 12.1 versus 17.0 ± 13.6; P = 0.08), as a result of a higher helplessness subscore (10.0 ± 6.2 versus 7.8 ± 6.2; P = 0.046). The PCS score was ≥ 30 in 14/54 (26%) SpA patients and in 19/86 (22%) RA patients; physicians identified catastrophizing in only 17 of these 33 patients. PCS scores showed moderate correlations with the AS-DAS and DAS-28 and slightly stronger correlations with the overall pain score (Pearson, +0.431; P = 0.0001). SpA patients reported significantly worse understanding by their co-workers than did RA patients (33.9 ± 33.4 versus 53.9 ± 36.3; P = 0.007).ConclusionOne-fourth of patients with SpA or RA had very high pain catastrophizing scores despite biotherapy. Pain catastrophizing was missed by the physicians in half the cases and was relatively independent from other follow-up parameters. Pain catastrophizing can jeopardize treatment outcomes and deserves specific management.     

Establishing the Reliability,Validity, and Prognostic Utility of the Momentary Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Use in Ecological Momentary Assessment Research

Despite the marked increase in ecological momentary assessment research, few reliable and valid measures of momentary experiences have been established. The goal of this preregistered study was to establish the reliability, validity, and prognostic utility of the momentary Pain Catastrophizing Scale (mPCS), a 3-item measure developed to assess situational pain catastrophizing. Participants in 2 studies of postsurgical pain outcomes completed the mPCS 3 to 5 times per day prior to surgery (N = 494, T = 20,271 total assessments). The mPCS showed good psychometric properties, including multilevel reliability and factor invariance across time. Participant-level average mPCS was strongly positively correlated with dispositional pain catastrophizing as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (r = .55 and .69 in study 1 and study 2, respectively). To establish prognostic utility, we then examined whether the mPCS improved prediction of postsurgical pain outcomes above and beyond one-time assessment of dispositional pain catastrophizing. Indeed, greater variability in momentary pain catastrophizing prior to surgery was uniquely associated with increased pain immediately after surgery (b = .58, P = .005), after controlling for preoperative pain levels and dispositional pain catastrophizing. Greater average mPCS score prior to surgery was also uniquely associated with lesser day-to-day improvement in postsurgical pain (b = .01, P = .003), whereas dispositional pain catastrophizing was not (b = −.007, P = .099). These results show that the mPCS is a reliable and valid tool for ecological momentary assessment research and highlight its potential utility over and above retrospective measures of pain catastrophizing.PerspectiveThis article presents the psychometric properties and prognostic utility of a new measure to assess momentary pain catastrophizing. This brief, 3-item measure will allow researchers and clinicians to assess fluctuations in pain catastrophizing during individuals’ daily lives, as well as dynamic relationships between catastrophizing, pain, and related factors.     

Do psychological factors increase the risk for back pain in the general population in both a cross‐sectional and prospective analysis?

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of background, individual and workplace psychological risk factors to investigated their relationship with spinal pain. Because there is some doubt as to whether the results of cross-sectional findings hold in longitudinal studies, a prospective study was superimposed upon a cross-sectional design of the effects of psychological variables on back pain and function to determine, whether similar results are obtained. Participants were workers randomly selected from the general population, where 372 had not experienced pain during the past year, and 209 had experienced considerable pain problems. A cross-sectional comparison of these groups using multivariate statistics indicated that the most potent risk factors were psychological distress (odds ratio=13.2) and poor function (odds ratio=6.4). Much smaller levels of risk were found for perceived workload, gender and foreign birth. Those participants with no pain were followed for one year to determine development of a spinal pain problem. Although few participants developed a significant pain problem, the prospective analyses showed that psychological distress (odds ratio=2.2), catastrophizing (odds ratio=3.0), and workload (odds ratio=2.3) produced the highest odds ratios. Taken together these results underscore the need for a multidimensional view of the development of pain disability. Moreover, individual psychological factors such as distress and catastrophizing as well as work place factors like work load were found to be highly related to the development of back pain in a sample of workers from the general population. The cross-sectional and prospective results were similar in character and demonstrate that cross-sectional studies may provide valuable information. Because psychological variables were relevant very early on, these factors may be important targets for pain prevention programs.     

Change in pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal surgery

Background Context

Even though catastrophizing can negatively moderate the outcome of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), it is still unclear whether pain catastrophizing is an enduring stable or a dynamic structure related to pain intensity after spine surgery.

Prefrontal White Matter Abnormalities Associated With Pain Catastrophizing in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

ObjectiveTo investigate altered prefrontal white matter integrity in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and its relation with the degree of pain catastrophizing.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingUniversity hospital.ParticipantsTwenty-one CRPS patients and 49 patients without CRPS (N=70).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe fractional anisotropy values within the prefrontal regions reflecting the structural integrity of white matter were measured in CRPS patients and patients without CRPS using diffusion tensor imaging. The degree of pain catastrophizing was also evaluated in CRPS patients.ResultsThe structural integrity of the prefrontal white matter was lower in CRPS patients than in patients without CRPS (P=.03). In addition, lower structural integrity in the prefrontal cortex was correlated with a higher degree of pain catastrophizing among CRPS patients (r= ?0.54, P=.01).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that pain catastrophizing, which is frequently reported in patients with CRPS, may be associated with the dysfunction of the prefrontal white matter.