Pain catastrophizing in children with chronic pain and their parents: Proposed clinical reference points and reexamination of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale measure

The current study aimed to validate the child and parent pain catastrophizing scale in a large chronic pain sample and to identify child pain catastrophizing clinical reference points. Patients and parents (n = 697) evaluated at a pediatric pain program completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, child (PCS-C) and parent (PCS-P) reports, along with additional measures of psychological functioning. The measure’s psychometric properties were examined, as were relations across demographic, pain, and psychological characteristics and pain catastrophizing. Clinical reference points were identified for the PCS-C from differences in pain catastrophizing across levels of disability, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. Overall, we did not find support for the hypothesized 3-dimension structure, and we recommend potentially removing items 7 and 8 for both the PCS-P and PCS-C as a result of floor/ceiling effects. The 11-item PCS-C is most parsimonious as a unitary construct, while the 11-item PCS-P comprises 2 factors. Although parent catastrophizing was significantly associated with child outcomes after controlling for pain level, it was no longer significant when accounting for child catastrophizing. When comparing PCS-C scores based on child outcomes, significant differences emerged for low, moderate, and high catastrophizing levels. It appears that the influence of parent catastrophizing on outcomes can be explained through its impact on child catastrophizing levels. PCS-C reference points derived from this large sample can aid clinicians in assessment and treatment planning, in turn increasing the utility of the PCS-C for both clinical and research purposes.     

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Achieve Better Satisfaction but Lower Functional Activities as Compared to Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Recently, poor patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained attention mainly in osteoarthritis (OA) patients; however, satisfaction after TKA remains to be understood in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This study aimed to examine satisfaction and function after RA TKA using patient-reported outcome measures and to compare the results with those of OA-TKA.

Catastrophic thinking about pain increases discomfort during internal atrial cardioversion

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether pain catastrophizing is associated with distress and perceived disability in patients with atrial fibrillation, whether pain catastrophizing predicts pain and fear during a medical procedure of atrial cardioversion, and whether pain catastrophizing influences the effects of an opioid analgesic during internal cardioversion. METHODS: A secondary analysis is performed upon data from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial during which the effect of intranasal butorphanol tartrate (INB) was evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation using a step-up internal atrial cardioversion protocol. Before the procedure, patients completed measures of pain catastrophizing, mood, distress and perceived disability. After each shock, patients completed measures of pain and fear. RESULTS: We found that pain catastrophizing predicted the affective pain rating of the first shock, and the fear increase during subsequent shocks. There was no effect of INB. However, when controlling for the differences in pain catastrophizing, INB significantly reduced fear as compared to placebo. This suggests that the effects of INB during atrial cardioversion were overshadowed by the effects of pain catastrophizing. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that in future atrial cardioversion trials, stratification based on pain catastrophizing be performed. Reducing catastrophizing thinking about pain through cognitive-behavioral techniques are likely to reduce levels of fear during internal atrial cardioversion and may increase the effectiveness of concomitant analgesics.     

Joint Line Modification in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Functional Activity but Not Patient Satisfaction

Background

Joint line modification in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) is attracting attention in expectation of optimizing patient satisfaction after TKA. This study aimed to examine the effects of joint line modification on Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), painDETECT score, and new Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011, all of which are robustly related to patient satisfaction.

Effects of brief pain education on hospitalized cancer patients with moderate to severe pain

The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to assess the effects of a structured pain education program on the pain experience of hospitalized cancer patients. Eligible cancer pain patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (receiving pain education 10–15 min per day for 5 days, n=15) or a standard care control group (n=15). The effects of the intervention on six pain-related variables were evaluated using three instruments. Pain intensity, pain interference with daily life, negative beliefs about opioids, beliefs about endurance of pain, pain catastrophizing (an individuals tendency to focus on and exaggerate the threat value of painful stimuli and negatively evaluate his or her own ability to deal with pain), and sense of control over pain were evaluated by the Brief Pain Inventory—Short Form Taiwanese version (BPI-T), Pain and Opioid Analgesic Beliefs Scale—Cancer (POABS-CA), and the Catastrophizing subscale and the sense of control over pain measure from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). The results indicated that, after completing treatment, patients who had received structured pain education had significantly less pain intensity on average, negative pain beliefs regarding opioids, pain endurance beliefs, and pain catastrophizing than patients in the control group. In addition, patients in the pain education group showed a significant increase in their sense of control over pain. These preliminary results strongly suggest that structured pain education can effectively improve the pain experience of hospitalized cancer patients and should be further implemented clinically.This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC89-B-038-042T).     

Are changes in fear‐avoidance beliefs,catastrophizing, and appraisals of control,predictive of changes in chronic low back pain and disability?

Interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) often attempt to modify patients' levels of catastrophizing, their fear-avoidance beliefs, and their appraisals of control. Presumably, these interventions are based on the notion that changes in these cognitive factors are related to changes in measures of adjustment. The aim of the present study was to explore whether changes on these cognitive factors were related to changes in CLBP and disability. Fifty-four CLBP patients completed a series of self-report measures prior to beginning a cognitive-behavioral based intervention and again upon discharge. Change scores (post-treatment score minus pre-treatment score) were calculated for each of the self-report measures. The study found that changes in the cognitive factors were not significantly associated with changes in pain intensity. In contrast, reductions in fear-avoidance beliefs about work and physical activity, as well as increased perceptions of control over pain were uniquely related to reductions in disability, even after controlling for reductions in pain intensity, age and sex. The final model explained 71% of the variance in reductions in disability.     

Repeat dose steroid in high pain responders after total knee arthroplasty: A study protocol

Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-known clinical problem potentially delaying ambulation and recovery. Perioperative glucocorticoids reduce pain and facilitate early recovery, but the optimal timing and dose are still unknown. High pain catastrophizers have an increased risk of poorly controlled postoperative pain, and moderate to severe pain at 24 h is associated with a risk of pain relapse at 48 h. To evaluate the effect of a repeat moderate dose of glucocorticoids after TKA in high pain catastrophizers presenting with moderate to severe pain 24 h postoperatively, having received preoperative high-dose glucocorticoids. High pain catastrophizers (Pain Catastrophizing Scale > 20) undergoing TKA are screened 24 h postoperatively and are included if they experience moderate to severe pain (VAS > 30) during a 5 m walk test. The included patients will receive either oral 24 mg dexamethasone (n = 55) or placebo (n = 55) on the evening of Day 1 (~30–37 h) after surgery. In addition, patients receive a standard multimodal analgesic regimen, including paracetamol, celecoxib, local infiltration analgesia, and preoperative dexamethasone (1 mg/kg). Patients will fill out a pain diary for 7 days after surgery. The primary outcome is moderate to severe pain (VAS > 30) during a 5 m walk test on the morning of Day 2 after surgery. The secondary outcomes include cumulated pain at rest and during ambulation, cumulated use of rescue analgesics, quality of sleep, lethargy, dizziness, nausea, satisfaction with the analgesic regimen, length of stay, morbidity, mortality, and reasons for readmissions. Follow-up is at 8 and 30 days. The data from this study will provide evidence for the effect of a repeated dose of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant in patients undergoing TKA with a high risk of postoperative pain.     

Association of musculoskeletal pain,fear-avoidance factors,and quality of life in active manual wheelchair users with SCI: A pilot study

Objective: Limited evidence examines the association of psychological factors, such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing, with musculoskeletal pain patterns in active manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study investigated the relationship among musculoskeletal pain, fear avoidance factors, quality of life (QoL), activity and duration of injury in individuals with SCI.

Design: Cross-sectional correlational.

Setting: Community setting.

Participants: Twenty-six individuals with SCI (age?=?42?±?14 years, duration manual wheelchair use?=?17?±?13 years, work/school/volunteer hours/week?=?31?±?14; recreation/sports hours/week 10?±?12).

Outcome Measures: Demographics and self-report measures including the Musculoskeletal Pain Survey (MPS), Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Fear of Pain (FPQ), Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQoL), and the Social Interaction Inventory (SII). Spearman’s rho (ρ) assessed correlation among measures.

Results: Strong association existed between age and duration of injury (ρ?=?0.66, P?<?0.001). SQoL offered a strong, direct correlation with age (ρ?=?0.63, P?=?0.01), duration of injury (ρ?=?0.70, P?=?0.001), and strong, inverse relationship with MPStotal (ρ?=??0.66, P?=?0.003) and MPS shoulder subscore (ρ?=??0.64, P?=?0.004). WUSPI demonstrated strong, inverse association with self-reported work hours (ρ?=??0.52, P?=?0.02) and a strong, direct relationship to PCS (ρ?=?0.79, P?=?<0001). PCS demonstrated a strong, inverse relationship to work/school/volunteer hours (ρ?=?0.71, P?<?0.001) and strong association to TSK-11_total (ρ?=?0.61, P?=?0.001). A moderate, inverse relationship was identified for recreational/sports hours and FPQ (ρ?=?0.48, P?=?0.03).

Conclusion: This cyclical relationship of musculoskeletal pain, reduced activity, and maladaptive psychological factors allude to interdependence of factors, supporting the multidisciplinary approach to care.