From the Cover: A new tubulin-binding site and pharmacophore for microtubule-destabilizing anticancer drugs

The recent success of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) in the treatment of cancer has led to a revived interest in microtubule-destabilizing agents. Here, we determined the high-resolution crystal structure of the complex between tubulin and maytansine, which is part of an ADC that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. We found that the drug binds to a site on β-tubulin that is distinct from the vinca domain and that blocks the formation of longitudinal tubulin interactions in microtubules. We also solved crystal structures of tubulin in complex with both a variant of rhizoxin and the phase 1 drug PM060184. Consistent with biochemical and mutagenesis data, we found that the two compounds bound to the same site as maytansine and that the structures revealed a common pharmacophore for the three ligands. Our results delineate a distinct molecular mechanism of action for the inhibition of microtubule assembly by clinically relevant agents. They further provide a structural basis for the rational design of potent microtubule-destabilizing agents, thus opening opportunities for the development of next-generation ADCs for the treatment of cancer.Microtubule-targeting agents such as the taxanes and the vinca alkaloids represent a successful class of anticancer drugs (1). Vinblastine, for example, is a microtubule-destabilizing agent (MDA) that is widely used in combination therapy for the treatment of childhood and adult malignancies (2). The broad clinical application of MDAs, however, is hampered by their severe adverse effects (3). This problem has been very recently addressed by the use of antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) approaches, which have revived interest in the development of highly potent MDAs for therapeutic use (4–6).For several important MDAs, the molecular mechanism of action on tubulin and microtubules has so far remained elusive. Rhizoxin, for example, is a potent MDA that has been investigated in phase 2 clinical trials, but for reasons poorly understood, it has demonstrated only very limited clinical efficacy (7). At the molecular level, it is well established that rhizoxin interferes with the binding of vinblastine to tubulin; however, the exact location of its binding site has been a matter of debate (8–10). Interestingly, biochemical and mutagenesis data suggest that the structurally unrelated MDA maytansine (9, 11), which is part of an ADC that was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (11, 12), and the phase 1 drug PM060184 (13, 14) (Fig. 1A) share a common tubulin-binding site with rhizoxin (9, 13, 14). These two latter drugs have also been reported to interfere with the binding of vinblastine; however, as for rhizoxin, the exact binding sites and modes of action of maytansine and PM060184 have not been elucidated (9, 14–16).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Structure of the tubulin–rhizoxin F complex. (A) Chemical structures of rhizoxin F, maytansine, and PM060184. (B) Overall view of the T₂R-TTL–rhizoxin F complex. Tubulin (gray), RB3 (light green), and TTL (violet) are shown in ribbon representation; the MDA rhizoxin F (orange) and GDP (cyan) are depicted in spheres representation. As a reference, the vinblastine structure (yellow, PDB ID no. 1Z2B) is superimposed onto the T₂R complex. (C) Overall view of the tubulin–rhizoxin F interaction in two different orientations. The tubulin dimer with bound ligand (α-tubulin-2 and β-tubulin-2 of the T₂R-TTL–rhizoxin F complex) is shown in surface representation. The vinblastine structure is superimposed onto the β-tubulin chain to highlight the distinct binding site of rhizoxin F. All ligands are in sphere representation and are colored in orange (rhizoxin F), cyan (GDP), and yellow (vinblastine). (D) Close-up view of the interaction observed between rhizoxin F (orange sticks) and β-tubulin (gray ribbon). Interacting residues of β-tubulin are shown in stick representation and are labeled.To establish the exact tubulin-binding site of rhizoxin, maytansine, and PM060184 and to clarify their specific interactions with the protein, we have investigated the structures of the corresponding ligand–tubulin complexes by X-ray crystallography. Our data reveal a new tubulin-binding site and pharmacophore for small molecules, and binding to this site is associated with a distinct molecular mechanism for the inhibition of microtubule formation.     

Effect of criminal justice mandate on drug treatment completion in women

Background: Drug and alcohol abuse among women is a growing problem in the United States. Drug treatment is an effective way to manage the psychological, biological, financial, and social cost of drug abuse. Prior research has identified criminal justice referrals or coercion as a predictor of treatment completion among men but questions remain about the same effect in women. Objectives: This study uses the Treatment Episodes Datasets Discharge 2006–2008 (TEDS-D) to explore the association between coercion and treatment completion among women. Methods: Analysis compared primary treatment episodes of coerced women to those who entered treatment voluntarily. A logistic model of the odds of treatment success was performed controlling for race/ethnicity, age, education, employment, primary substance of abuse, number of substances reported at admission, referral source, treatment setting, and treatment duration. Results: 582?671 primary treatment episodes were analyzed comparing women with coercion referrals (n?=?196?660) to those who entered treatment voluntarily (n?=?390?054). Results of multivariable logistic modeling showed that coerced women had better odds of completion or transfer than women who entered voluntarily. However, this association was modified by treatment setting with better odds in ambulatory (OR?=?1.49 [1.47, 1.51]) than in inpatient (OR?=?1.06 [1.03, 1.10]) and worst outcomes in detoxification (OR?=?0.89 [0.84, 0.96]). Conclusion: These results dispute the broad effectiveness of legal mandates across all drug treatment settings among women. They show the need for further recognition of female-specific characteristics that can affect motivation and treatment success to better inform healthcare and judicial policies on drug treatment services for women.     

Positioning sulphonylureas in a modern treatment algorithm for patients with type 2 diabetes: Expert opinion from a European consensus panel

The large number of pharmacological agents available to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) makes choosing the optimal drug for any given patient a complex task. Because newer agents offer several advantages, whether and when sulphonylureas (SUs) should still be used to treat T2D is controversial. Published treatment guidelines and recommendations should govern the general approach to diabetes management. However, expert opinions can aid in better understanding local practices and in formulating individual choices. The current consensus paper aims to provide additional guidance on the use of SUs in T2D. We summarize current local treatment guidelines in European countries, showing that SUs are still widely proposed as second-line treatment after metformin and are often ranked at the same level as newer glucose-lowering medications. Strong evidence now shows that sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are associated with low hypoglycaemia risk, promote weight loss, and exert a positive impact on vascular, cardiac and renal endpoints. Thus, using SUs in place of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs may deprive patients of key advantages and potentially important cardiorenal benefits. In subjects with ascertained cardiovascular disease or at very high cardiovascular risk, SGLT-2is and/or GLP-1RAs should be used as part of diabetes management, in the absence of contraindications. Routine utilization of SUs as second-line agents continues to be acceptable in resource-constrained settings.     

The novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide transiently delays gastric emptying similarly to selective long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists

The effect of dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA) tirzepatide on gastric emptying (GE) was compared to that of GLP-1RAs in non-clinical and clinical studies. GE was assessed following acute and chronic treatment with tirzepatide in diet-induced obese mice versus semaglutide or long-acting GIP analogue alone. Participants [with and without type 2 diabetes (T2DM)] from a phase 1, 4-week multiple dose study received tirzepatide, dulaglutide or placebo. GE was assessed by acetaminophen absorption. In mice, tirzepatide delayed GE to a similar degree to that achieved with semaglutide; however, these acute inhibitory effects were abolished after 2 weeks of treatment. GIP analogue alone had no effect on GE or on GLP-1's effect on GE. In participants with and without T2DM, once-weekly tirzepatide (≥5 and ≥4.5 mg, respectively) delayed GE after a single dose. This effect diminished after multiple doses of tirzepatide or dulaglutide in healthy participants. In participants with T2DM treated with an escalation schedule of tirzepatide 5/5/10/10 or 5/5/10/15 mg, a residual GE delay was still observed after multiple doses. These data suggest that tirzepatide's activity on GE is comparable to that of selective GLP-1RAs.