排序方式: 共有156条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
31.
32.
John A. Vargo Matthew C. Ward Jimmy J. Caudell Nadeem Riaz Neal E. Dunlap Derek Isrow Sara J. Zakem Joshua Dault Musaddiq J. Awan Kristin A. Higgins Comron Hassanadeh Jonathan J. Beitler Chandana A. Reddy Samuel Marcrom Drexell H. Boggs James A. Bonner Min Yao Mitchell Machtay Dwight E. Heron 《International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics》2018,100(3):595-605
33.
34.
35.
K. Choinski J.P. Rocca J. Torabi K. Lorenzen C. Yongue M.E. Herbert T. Block A. Chokechanachaisakul L. Kamal M. Kinkhabwala J.A. Graham 《Transplantation proceedings》2017,49(10):2305-2309
Background
Our center has used a strategy of pancreas importation owing to long regional waitlist times. Here we assess the clinical outcomes and financial considerations of this strategy.Methods
This was a retrospective observational cohort study of patients who received a pancreas transplant at Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) from 2014 to 2017 (n = 28). Clinical parameters, including hemoglobin A1c and complications, were analyzed. The cohort was compared with United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Region 9 with the use of the UNOS/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. Cost analysis of length of stay (LOS), standard acquisition (SAC) fees, and transportation was performed with the use of internal financial data.Results
Pancreas importation resulted in significantly shorter simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant waitlist times compared with Region 9: 518 days vs 1001 days (P = .038). In addition, postoperative complications and 1-year HbA1c did not differ between groups: local 6.30% vs import 6.17% (P = .87). Patients receiving local pancreata stayed an average of 9.2 days compared with 11 days for the import group (P = .36). As such, pancreas importation was associated with higher mean charges ($445,968) compared with local pancreas recipients ($325,470).Conclusions
Long waitlist times in Region 9 have encouraged our center's adoption of pancreas importation to address the needs of our patient population. This practice has resulted in a reduction of waitlist times by an average of 483 days. Understandably, centers have long been wary of importation owing to perceived risk in clinical outcomes. In our single-center experience, we have demonstrated equivalent postoperative glucose control and graft survival. Importantly, there does appear to be increased costs associated with importation, which are mainly driven by LOS. Curiously, importation from regions with lower SAC fees has the potential to offset costs related to transportation expenses. Notwithstanding these findings, pancreas importation does have the potential to lessen the financial societal burden through reduction in waitlist times. 相似文献36.
Introduction
Kidney allograft torsion (KAT) is a rare complication of kidney transplantation (KT) that occurs when the transplanted kidney rotates around its vascular pedicle, which may result in a catastrophic compromise of the graft's blood supply, deterioration of kidney function, and eventually premature graft death.Case Report
We report the case of a patient who had an acute kidney injury (AKI) episode from KAT. Her diagnosis was ascertained expeditiously and she had prompt surgical management. Five years after the KAT event, her baseline creatinine (Cr) stabilized around 1.6 mg/dL and she has achieved >8-year graft survival.Discussion
This case illustrates the reversibility of injury that can occur after a KAT event with a commensurate return to baseline kidney function when KAT is promptly diagnosed and treated. A high index of suspicion of this uncommon but catastrophic complication of KT must be maintained to achieve desirable long-term outcomes. A diagnosis of KAT must be considered when routine etiologies of an acute deterioration of kidney allograft function have been excluded. Finally, prophylactic nephropexy must be strongly considered with intraperitoneal placement of a kidney allograft to avoid KAT. 相似文献37.
Sadaf Sahraian Elham Beheshtian Arya Haj-Mirzaian Matthew D. Alvin David M. Yousem 《Journal of the American College of Radiology》2019,16(5):683-690
PurposeThe ACR Appropriateness Criteria recommend performing noncontrast head CT (NCCT) for patients with sudden severe headache (“worst headache of life” [WHOL] or “thunderclap headache” [TCH]). The aim of this study was to assess the value of NCCT scanning in patients with known migraine histories and WHOL or TCH. The hypothesis was that there would be little utility in performing emergency department (ED) NCCT scans in migraineurs without other red flags, even if they had WHOL or TCH.MethodsThe ED NCCT scans of all patients reporting WHOL or TCH who had established diagnoses of migraine were retrospectively reviewed over a 5-year period. Patients without known intracranial pathology, cancer, or immunocompromising disease or recent head trauma were included as the main study group. For comparison, patients with any of those factors were included as the comparison group. Scans were graded as (1) normal, (2) minor unimportant findings, (3) findings requiring intervention or follow-up, or (4) critical.ResultsTwo hundred twenty-four patients with the chief symptom of WHOL or TCH and a history of migraine who underwent ED NCCT were studied. In the main study group, no patients had grade 4 imaging findings (0%), one had a false-positive grade 3 finding (0.8%), and there were no cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage (0%). In the comparison group, six patients had grade 4 imaging findings (6.5%) and three had grade 3 findings (3.3%).ConclusionsNCCT in known migraineurs with WHOL or TCH who do not have intracranial pathology, cancer, immunocompromising disease, or recent head trauma yielded no critical findings. Therefore, the value of scanning these patients is questionable. 相似文献
38.
39.
40.
Diane C. Ling John A. Vargo Steven A. Burton Dwight E. Heron Sushil Beriwal 《Practical radiation oncology》2019,9(6):418-425
PurposeTo determine the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for isolated nodal recurrences of gynecologic malignancies within a previously irradiated area.Methods and MaterialsA retrospective review was performed on 20 patients who underwent 21 curative-intent reirradiation SBRT treatments for locoregional recurrences of gynecologic malignancies. Disease control and survival outcomes were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Treatment toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.ResultsAll patients had an isolated pelvic, paraortic, or intra-abdominal nodal recurrence, with the exception of 1 patient who had a concurrent paraortic and right acetabulum metastasis, both of which were irradiated with SBRT. Primary sites included cervix (30.0%), uterus (55.0%), vulva (5.0%), vagina (5.0%), and ovary (5.0%). Median prior external beam radiation therapy dose was 45 Gy. Recurrences were in field in 14 (66.7%) and marginal in 7 (33.3%). SBRT was directed to the pelvis in 13 cases (61.9%) and to paraortic or celiac nodes in 8 (38.1%). The most common SBRT regimen was 40 to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 12). At a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 3-year actuarial in-field local control, distant progression-free survival, and overall survival were 61.4%, 44.0%, and 51.9%, respectively. At the time of last follow-up, 9 (45.0%) patients remained alive without evidence of disease. Actuarial 3-year risk of grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 late toxicities was 38.1% and 14.3%, respectively.ConclusionsSBRT for isolated pelvic or intra-abdominal recurrences of gynecologic malignancies within a previously irradiated field is feasible with an acceptable toxicity rate. With this approach, about half of patients achieved durable disease-free survival. 相似文献