Disparities in antidepressant treatment in Medicaid elderly diagnosed with depression

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there were racial or ethnic disparities in the use of antidepressants in low-income elderly patients insured by Medicaid. DESIGN: Examination of 1998 Medicaid claims data. SETTING: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid claims data for five U.S. states. PARTICIPANTS: All Medicaid recipients aged 65 to 84 with a diagnosis of depression. MEASUREMENTS: Treatment versus no treatment; in those treated, treatment with drugs was classified as old- or new-generation antidepressants. RESULTS: In 1998, 7,339 unique individuals aged 65 to 84 had at least one outpatient encounter with depression as the primary diagnosis. Nearly one in four (24.2%) received no antidepressant drug therapy, and 22% received neither psychotherapy nor an antidepressant. African-American individuals were substantially more likely to be untreated (37.1%) than Hispanic (23.6%), white (22.4%), or Asian (13.8%) individuals. In logistic regression models adjusting for sex, state, long-term care status, and age group, African Americans with a primary diagnosis of depression were almost twice as likely as whites not to receive an antidepressant within the study period (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval=1.62-2.24). Patients in long-term care facilities and those aged 65 to 74 were less likely to receive treatment. CONCLUSION: Substantial numbers of elderly Medicaid enrollees with a primary diagnosis of depression did not receive antidepressants or behavioral therapy. This gap in care disproportionately affected African-American patients.     

Race and ethnic variation in college students’ allostatic regulation of racism-related stress

Racism-related stress is thought to contribute to widespread race/ethnic health inequities via negative emotion and allostatic stress process up-regulation. Although prior studies document race-related stress and health correlations, due to methodological and technical limitations, they have been unable to directly test the stress-reactivity hypothesis in situ. Guided by theories of constructed emotion and allostasis, we developed a protocol using wearable sensors and daily surveys that allowed us to operationalize and time-couple self-reported racism-related experiences, negative emotions, and an independent biosignal of emotional arousal. We used data from 100 diverse young adults at a predominantly White college campus to assess racism-related stress reactivity using electrodermal activity (EDA), a biosignal of sympathetic nervous system activity. We find that racism-related experiences predict both increased negative emotion risk and heightened EDA, consistent with the proposed allostatic model of health and disease. Specific patterns varied across race/ethnic groups. For example, discrimination and rumination were associated with negative emotion for African American students, but only interpersonal discrimination predicted increased arousal via EDA. The pattern of results was more general for Latinx students, for whom interpersonal discrimination, vicarious racism exposure, and rumination significantly modulated arousal. As with Latinx students, African students were particularly responsive to vicarious racism while 1.5 generation Black students were generally not responsive to racism-related experiences. Overall, these findings provide support for allostasis-based theories of mental and physical health via a naturalistic assessment of the emotional and sympathetic nervous system responding to real-life social experiences.

Racism in the United States shapes interracial social interactions (1) and, mirroring society-wide trends in the racialization of American politics (2, 3), the situation may be worsening with rising racial animosity (4, 5). Consequently, racism-related stress is hypothesized to contribute to widespread minority health disparities (6) and Black/White mortality differentials on a scale sufficient to influence election outcomes (7). One possible explanation for these disparities is that race-related stress increases negative emotions and physiological wear and tear via modulation of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and immune system (8). Up-regulation of these systems, often referred to generically as “the stress process,” is the outcome of the brain’s predictive modeling and regulation of the body’s energetic needs, or allostasis (9). Here, race-related stress is thought to increase energy demands as the brain prepares the body to deal with threats by marshaling oxygen, glucose, and other energetic mediators (10). Consequently, researchers have argued that ongoing allostatic up-regulation of the autonomic and endocrine systems, combined with immune activity modulation, in response to racism-related threats is physiologically taxing and over time increases vulnerability to chronic disease (11, 12). For example, downstream physiological adaptions to a body energized on high alert are thought to increase risks for excess adiposity, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (13–15), traditionally the leading cause of death in the United States.Despite the theoretical importance of regulatory allostatic processes for understanding racial health inequities, racism-related physiological responding has not been directly measured in real time in the real world. Conducting these assessments is challenging because the timing of many socially mediated experiences, such as racism-related incidents, occur in “social time”; that is, they are dependent upon actions beyond the control of the individual, are largely unobserved, and are highly variable and stochastic. Acute physiological changes are thus responses to temporally variable stimuli and are modulated on precise time scales in the order of seconds (i.e., SAM) and minutes (i.e., HPA). Although systematic and metaanalytic reviews find evidence that discriminatory experiences are correlated with mental and physical health both early (6) and later in life (16), most studies are cross-sectional, retrospective, and rely on behavioral and psychological self-reports, even when employing temporally sensitive methodologies (17). Although a few recent studies in natural settings incorporating biomarkers consistent with models of allostasis have begun filtering into the literature (18), their measurement strategies are not time-synchronized with race-related experiences. These studies provide post hoc evidence of allostatic process modulation, but do not measure allostatic regulation concurrently as it transpires in situ.Our study was designed to address these limitations and to directly test allostatic modulation of the sympathetic component of the SAM response to racism-related stress. To these ends, we developed a prospective protocol capturing events throughout the day, including the timing of racism-related experiences of perceived interpersonal discrimination, rumination on racism, and vicarious racism exposure, as well as negative emotions. Our design also included a wearable device that continuously tracked SAM activity using an electrodermal activity (EDA) sensor, a direct measure of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) division of the autonomic nervous system that indexes affective arousal. This approach facilitated approximate time-synchronization of racism-related experiences with the SNS-mediated first-stage allostatic stress-response pathway. We were therefore able to operationalize two key aspects of stress-response dynamics temporally coupled with racism-related stressors: Negative emotion and SNS arousal. To our knowledge, this study provides a temporally coregistered and ecologically embedded assessment of the dynamic links between race-related stressors, negative emotions, and the SAM-mediated SNS component of a stress response among individuals of diverse ethnic backgrounds.     

Influence of usual source of care on differences by race/ethnicity in receipt of preventive services

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relation between race/ethnicity and receipt of preventive services and the effect of having a usual source of care (USOC) on receipt of preventive services in different racial and ethnic groups. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed data from adults, aged 18 to 64 years in the Household Component of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey of health care use for the United States. MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of adults who received age-appropriate preventive services. RESULTS: Compared to white respondents, Hispanics were less likely to receive breast exams and blood pressure and cholesterol screening than were white respondents, and blacks were more likely to report receiving a Pap smear. Despite being less likely to report having a USOC, black and Hispanic women were as likely or more likely to report receiving breast and cervical cancer screening, after controlling for having a USOC and other factors. Hispanics reported receiving blood pressure screening less often, and blacks reported receiving more cholesterol screening. For each race/ethnicity group, having a USOC was associated with receiving preventive services. However, controlling for USOC and other confounders attenuated, but did not eliminate, differences by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION: The differences by race in receipt of preventive services suggest the need for different starting points for devising strategies to address racial differences in disease outcomes. While having a USOC will be important in narrowing the differences by race in receipt of preventive services, attending to other factors that contribute to disparities in health will also be essential.     

Sex and Race Differences in Pain Sensitization among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Growing evidence suggests that chronic low back pain (CLBP) is associated with pain sensitization, and that there are sex and race disparities in CLBP. Given the sex and race differences in pain sensitization, this has been hypothesized as a mechanism contributing to the sex and race disparities in CLBP. This study examined sex and race differences in pain sensitization among patients with CLBP, as well as the role of catastrophizing as a potential mediator of those differences. The study found that compared with men, women required less pressure to produce deep muscle pain and rated mechanical punctate pain as more painful. Compared with non-Hispanic white patients, black patients demonstrated greater pain sensitivity for measures of deep muscle hyperalgesia and mechanical punctate pain. Furthermore, catastrophizing partially mediated the race differences in deep muscle pain such that black participants endorsed greater pain catastrophizing, which partially accounted for their increased sensitivity to, and temporal summation of, deep muscle pain. Taken together, these results support the need to further examine the role of catastrophizing and pain sensitization in the context of sex and race disparities in the experience of CLBP.