Laryngopharyngeal reflux and Helicobacter pylori

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) occurs when gastric contents pass the upper esophageal sphincter, causing symptoms such as hoarseness, sore throat, coughing, excess throat mucus, and globus. The pattern of reflux is different in LPR and gastroesophageal reflux. LPR usually occurs during the daytime in the upright position whereas gastroesophageal reflux disease more often occurs in the supine position at night-time or during sleep. Ambulatory 24-h double pH-probe monitoring is the gold standard diagnostic tool for LPR. Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitor on a long-term basis is the mainstay of treatment. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is found in many sites including laryngeal mucosa and interarytenoid region. In this paper, we aim to present the relationship between LPR and H. pylori and review the current literature.     

Impact on sleeve gastrectomy in patients with esophageal motor disorder

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motor disorders (EMD) are frequent conditions among patients with obesity. The effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on esophageal function can worsen GERD, but little is known about its effects on EMD and the consequences of preexisting EMD on GERD after SG.ObjectivesTo study the postoperative outcomes of SG in a population of patients displaying preexisting EMD.SettingUniversity Hospital, France.MethodsPatients with EMD confirmed by high-resolution manometry who underwent a laparoscopic SG between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively included in this monocenter study. GERD symptoms and high-resolution manometry results were recorded before surgery and during follow-up. Conversion to gastric bypass were also recorded.ResultsThirty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 52.6 ± 12.9 years. Most patients were female (70%). EMD were achalasia (19% of patients), hypercontractile (22%), hypocontractile (30%) and nutcracker esophagus (22%), and ineffective esophageal motility (8%). GERD symptoms were present in 10 patients (27%) preoperatively and 18 (49%) postoperatively. Achalasia was not resolved after SG and was constantly associated with disabling food blockage or GERD symptoms after surgery, and 3 of 4 patients with nutcracker esophagus had postoperative GERD symptoms and underwent gastric bypass.ConclusionsThis study is the largest to describe the course of GERD and EMD after SG in patients displaying preoperative EMD. Achalasia and nutcracker esophagus are associated with poorer postoperative outcomes, and another procedure such as a gastric bypass should be performed.     

胃食管反流病的治疗进展

胃食管反流病是常见的上消化道动力障碍性疾病，发病率呈现逐年上升趋势，目前胃食管反流病的治疗主要有改变生活方式、应用质子泵抑制剂以及中药治疗。对于药物治疗无效的胃食管反流病，内镜治疗如内镜下射频消融、注射治疗以及抗反流手术及外科手术治疗均可改善患者症状，减少胃食管反流病的并发症发生，对于胃食管反流病患者的治疗，应根据具体情况，选择恰当的治疗方法。     

Duodenogastric biliary reflux assessed by scintigraphic scan in patients with reflux symptoms after sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary results

BackgroundBile reflux is a factor in the appearance of severe esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus, which have been reported after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Incompetent lower esophageal sphincter and increased gastroesophageal acid reflux have been demonstrated after this operation. Some reports have shown bile content in the antrum during endoscopic control, but no investigations objectively confirm the presence of duodenogastric bile reflux in these patients.ObjectivesTo evaluate the presence of duodenogastric bile reflux (DGR) after SG in patients presenting reflux symptoms.SettingUniversity hospital.MethodsProspective study of 22 patients presenting reflux symptoms who underwent SG for morbid obesity and who received endoscopic evaluation and scintigraphic study to confirm esophagitis and duodenogastric bile reflux.ResultsErosive esophagitis was observed in 11 patients and Barrett’s esophagus in 2 patients. Seven patients (31.8%) presented positive DGR. Among them, 3 had type B and C esophagitis. The other 4 patients did not present esophagitis in spite of reflux symptoms.ConclusionDGR may be present in patients with gastroesophageal reflux after SG. This line of investigation requires further studies to confirm this hypothesis.     

Improved health outcomes in integrative medicine visits may reflect differences in physician and patient behaviors compared to standard medical visits

ObjectiveTo identify differences in patient-physician interactions associated with improvements in GERD symptoms in a randomized controlled trial comparing integrative medicine and primary care/standard visits.MethodsWe analyzed video recordings of 2-minute excerpts (thin slices) from the beginning, middle, and end of 21 study visits (11 standard, 10 integrative medicine).ResultsAccording to blind coders’ analysis of the excerpts, prospective improvement in GERD symptoms was most highly correlated with patients appearing pleased (r = 0.71, p < 0.01) and friendly (r = 0.67, p < 0.01) at the end of the visit, controlling for visit type. The combination of patient and physician smiling at the end of the visit was associated with improvement in GERD symptoms (r² = 0.45, p = 0.004). The physician in the integrative visits was more engaged (p = 0.009), friendly (p = 0.005), relaxed (p = 0.002), smiled longer (p = 0.006), gazed longer (p = 0.02), and gestured more (p = 0.007), compared to standard visits. Patients in integrative visits also smiled longer (p = 0.004).ConclusionThe expanded history-taking questions asked by integrative clinicians may enhance relationship building, modifying patients’ responses and improving patient-centered behaviors from clinicians,ultimately facilitating symptom improvement.Practice ImplicationsAnalysis of nonverbal behaviors may facilitate a better understanding of patient-clinician interactions in integrative medicine visits and yield insights to improve clinical interactions in conventional medicine.     

Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review

BackgroundMultidisciplinary management of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains unstandardized worldwide. We performed a systemic review to summarize the advancements, regional differences, and current recommended multidisciplinary treatment strategies for LAGC.MethodsEligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases and Embase. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials which investigated survival of patients with LAGC who underwent gastrectomy with pre-/perioperative, postoperative chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy were included.ResultsIn total, we identified 11 studies of pre-/perioperative chemotherapy, 38 of postoperative chemotherapy, and 14 of chemoradiotherapy. In Europe and the USA, the current standard of care is perioperative chemotherapy for patients with LAGC using the regimen of 5-FU, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT). In Eastern Asia, upfront gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy is commonly used. The S-1 monotherapy or a regimen of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) are used for patients with stage II disease, and the CapOx regimen or the S-1 plus docetaxel regimen are recommended for those with stage III Gastric cancer (GC). The addition of postoperative radiotherapy to peri- or postoperative chemotherapy is currently not recommended. Additionally, clinical trials testing targeted therapy and immunotherapy are increasingly performed worldwide.ConclusionsRecent clinical trials showed a survival benefit of peri-over postoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. As such, this strategy may have a potential as a global standard for patients with LAGC. Outcome of the ongoing clinical trials is expected to establish the global standard of multidisciplinary treatment strategy in patients with LAGC.