The slope parameter of concentration-response curves used as a touchstone for the existence of spare receptors

The present work was stimulated by findings of a large reserve of presynaptic α₂-autoreceptors in rat neocortex by different investigators and our own group, using classical models of receptor agonism. The mathematical background of these classical models seems erroneous since the asymmetry that spare receptors introduce into concentration-response curves is not considered appropriately. This asymmetry leads to a steepening of curve fits based on the logistic function. Therefore, the slope parameter c of a logistically fitted concentration-response curve can be used as a touchstone for the existence of spare receptors. Spare receptors induce a c > 1. Concentration-response data of the α₂-autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of evoked [³H]-noradrenaline release in rat neocortex slices were re-analysed. The estimates of the slope parameter c of logistically fitted concentration-response curves obtained after treatment of rats with either vehicle or N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) to achieve an irreversible inactivation of α₂-autoreceptors, were not compatible with the existence of a large receptor reserve. A model for nonlinear regression analysis developed under the a priori assumption of spare receptors confirmed the absence of spare receptors. Received: 13 December 1996 / Accepted: 30 May 1997     

Regulation of Son of sevenless by the membrane-actin linker protein ezrin

Receptor tyrosine kinases participate in several signaling pathways through small G proteins such as Ras (rat sarcoma). An important component in the activation of these G proteins is Son of sevenless (SOS), which catalyzes the nucleotide exchange on Ras. For optimal activity, a second Ras molecule acts as an allosteric activator by binding to a second Ras-binding site within SOS. This allosteric Ras-binding site is blocked by autoinhibitory domains of SOS. We have reported recently that Ras activation also requires the actin-binding proteins ezrin, radixin, and moesin. Here we report the mechanism by which ezrin modulates SOS activity and thereby Ras activation. Active ezrin enhances Ras/MAPK signaling and interacts with both SOS and Ras in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, in vitro kinetic assays with recombinant proteins show that ezrin also is important for the activity of SOS itself. Ezrin interacts with GDP-Ras and with the Dbl homology (DH)/pleckstrin homology (PH) domains of SOS, bringing GDP-Ras to the proximity of the allosteric site of SOS. These actions of ezrin are antagonized by the neurofibromatosis type 2 tumor-suppressor protein merlin. We propose an additional essential step in SOS/Ras control that is relevant for human cancer as well as all physiological processes involving Ras.The small GTPase Ras (rat sarcoma) regulates essential cellular processes such as proliferation, motility, and differentiation. Activation of Ras by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is mediated by the guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) Son of sevenless (SOS). SOS is recruited by activated RTKs and subsequently engages Ras. In recent years, however, it has been recognized that this simple activation process is subject to a complex regulation. A number of regulatory motifs on SOS have been identified: the C-terminal catalytic Ras-binding domain for nucleotide exchange (1), the N-terminal half that carries histone-like sequences rich in positively charged amino acids, a Dbl homology (DH) domain, and a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (1, 2). The DH/PH domains decrease the catalytic activity of SOS by folding back on the catalytic domain, thereby restricting accessibility to a second Ras-binding site that is distinct from the catalytic site (2). This allosteric Ras-binding site is important for the activation of SOS. Thus, Ras itself is an essential determinant of SOS regulation (2). Finally, lipid interaction contributes to the activation of SOS: The positively charged histone-like sequences interact with the negatively charged plasma membrane (3, 4). Moreover, binding of both phosphoinositides to the PH domain (5) and phosphatidic acid (PA) to the histone-like domain enhances SOS activity by relieving autoinhibition and exposing the allosteric Ras-binding site (6–8).Our interest in small GTPases was triggered originally by the observation that members of a family of actin-binding proteins—ezrin, radixin, and moesin (ERM)—appear to enhance Ras activity (9). We showed that in response to growth factors ERM proteins form a multiprotein complex at the plasma membrane that comprises Ras, SOS, filamentous actin, and coreceptors such as β1-integrin. Coreceptors focus these complexes to relevant sites of RTK activity at the plasma membrane/F-actin interface. We defined binding sites on ezrin for both Ras and SOS, mutations of which destroy the interactions and inhibit the activation of Ras. Our data revealed that ERM proteins are essential intermediates in the control of Ras activity that fine-tune growth factor signals. In the present study we dissect the level of ERM action in a purified system: In addition to the direct assembly of Ras and SOS, ezrin (the ERM protein prototype) participates in the control of SOS activity by facilitating the encounter of Ras and SOS. We conclude that ezrin mediates the spatiotemporal control of Ras activity by acting as a regulatory scaffold for Ras and SOS.     

Dealing with Time-Dependent Pharmacokinetics during the Early Clinical Development of a New Leukotriene B4 Synthesis Inhibitor

Purpose The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of achieving a practical dosing regimen for 2,4,6-triiodophenol (AM-24), a new leukotriene B₄ (LTB₄) synthesis inhibitor. First, a model capable of dealing with the nonlinearity in its pharmacokinetic profile was built, and then it was combined with a pharmacodynamic model previously established with data from earlier phase I trials. Methods One week after the first 240-, 350-, or 500-mg oral dose of AM-24, six additional doses were given to 24 healthy volunteers once daily. A total of 33 blood samples were obtained from each individual. Different models, including enzyme turnover models, were fitted to the data by using the software NONMEM. Results Drug absorption was modeled with a first-order process. Drug disposition was described with a one-compartment model, and elimination with an (auto)inhibited and a noninhibited clearance. AM-24 inhibited the enzyme production rate to a maximum of 98%. Relative bioavailability was independent of the decrease in the amount of enzyme. The estimate of the enzyme turnover half-life was 8.5 h. Conclusions Simulations have shown that steady-state conditions eliciting 90% of maximal LTB₄ synthesis inhibition can be reached after 3 weeks during an oral treatment with AM-24 administered at the dosage of 500 mg once daily.     

Presynaptic modulation of the release of the co-transmitters noradrenaline and ATP

Summary— The release of both sympathetic co-transmitters, noradrenaline and ATP, is modulated via presynaptic receptors. However, the degree of the modulation may differ indicating that the ratio of the released co-transmitters changes upon presynaptic receptor activation. For example, α₂-autoinhibition affects the release of noradrenaline more markedly than the release of ATP. Some sympathetic axon terminals possess presynaptic P₂-purinoceptors which are activated by endogenous ATP. These receptors are a novel kind of auto-receptor: they mediate a presynaptic negative feedback mechanism in which released ATP inhibits subsequent co-transmitter release.     

AUTOINHIBITION, SYMPATHETIC COTRANSMISSION AND BIPHASIC CONTRACTILE RESPONSES TO TRAINS OF NERVE STIMULATION IN THE RODENT VAS DEFERENS

1. The present review critically discusses the evidence for and against the various hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the biphasic contractile response of the rodent vas deferens to trains of electrical field stimulation (EFS). 2. It is widely accepted that the initial component of the biphasic response of the rodent isolated vas deferens to trains of EFS is mediated by ATP and the second slower tonic contraction is mediated by noradrenaline (NA). This theory is based on the ability of antagonists of the post-junctional receptors for these neurotransmitters to inhibit the respective components of the biphasic response and on the ability of exogenous application of either ATP or NA to mimic the responses of each phase. 3. Prejunctional autoinhibition has also been proposed as the cause of the biphasic response. This is based primarily on the ability of α₂-adrenoceptor antagonists to transform responses from biphasic to monophasic and on the ability of neuronal NA uptake inhibitors to accentuate the separation of the two phases. 4. Atypical or extrajunctional NA receptors have also been proposed to be the mediators of the component of the response to nerve stimulation that is resistant to the traditional α-adrenoceptor antagonists. 5. Different contractile mechanisms and/or sources of calcium have also been postulated to cause the biphasic response. Blockers of intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization are able to block the initial component, while blockers of extracellular Ca²⁺ entry inhibit the second tonic phase. 6. It is concluded that because α₁-adrenoceptor antagonists and blockers of P₂ purinoceptors have also been shown to block both phases of the response to trains of EFS, prejunctional auto-inhibitory mechanisms perhaps provide the most sound explanation for the phenomenon of the biphasic contractile response to trains of EFS.     

Evaluation by reverse phase HPLC of [3H]acetylcholine release evoked from the myenteric plexus of the rat

Summary Myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle strips isolated from the small intestine of rats were incubated with [³H]choline to measure the synthesis and the release of [³H]acetylcholine. To separate different radioactive compounds (acetylcholine, choline, phosphorylcholine) from both the tissue and the overflow a new method, the reverse phase HPLC, was used.The radiochromatogram following the injection of a [³H]choline-standard and a [¹⁴C]acetylcholine-standard onto the HPLC showed a clear separation of both isotopes with a recovery rate of roughly 100%. Incubation of the muscle strips with [³H]choline caused the synthesis of [³H]acetylcholine (30,000 dpm/preparation) that increased 2-fold, when the electrical field stimulation during labelling was increased from 0.2 Hz to 1 Hz. Electrical field stimulation (3 Hz, 2 min) caused an increase in tritium efflux that was abolished by the removal of extracellular calcium or by the addition of tetrodotoxin. Analysis by reverse phase HPLC of the overflow showed that the stimulated increase in tritium overflow was balanced by the enhanced release of [³H]acetylcholine, whereas the overflow of [³H]choline was not affected by the electrical field stimulation. Oxotremorine (1 mol/l) suppressed the release of [³H]acetylcholine by 60%. Scopolamine (0.1 mol/l) prevented this inhibition and, given alone, enhanced the release of [³H]acetylcholine by 43%. The release of [³H]acetylcholine evoked at 0.2, 2 or 20 Hz did not consistently decline at increasing frequencies.The present experiments show the synthesis and the calcium-dependent release of [³H]acetylcholine from the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation of rats correspondingly to the same in-vitro preparation isolated from guinea-pigs. Muscarinic autoinhibition operates also in the small intestine of rats. However, some differences (frequency-dependency of [³H]acetylcholine release, spontaneous neuronal activity) are evident between both species. Reverse phase HPLC is a useful method to separate radioactive choline and acetylcholine with a high recovery rate.Send offprint requests to I. Wessler at the above address     

EFA6 controls Arf1 and Arf6 activation through a negative feedback loop

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) of the exchange factor for Arf6 (EFA6), brefeldin A-resistant Arf guanine nucleotide exchange factor (BRAG), and cytohesin subfamilies activate small GTPases of the Arf family in endocytic events. These ArfGEFs carry a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain in tandem with their catalytic Sec7 domain, which is autoinhibitory and supports a positive feedback loop in cytohesins but not in BRAGs, and has an as-yet unknown role in EFA6 regulation. In this study, we analyzed how EFA6A is regulated by its PH and C terminus (Ct) domains by reconstituting its GDP/GTP exchange activity on membranes. We found that EFA6 has a previously unappreciated high efficiency toward Arf1 on membranes and that, similar to BRAGs, its PH domain is not autoinhibitory and strongly potentiates nucleotide exchange on anionic liposomes. However, in striking contrast to both cytohesins and BRAGs, EFA6 is regulated by a negative feedback loop, which is mediated by an allosteric interaction of Arf6-GTP with the PH-Ct domain of EFA6 and monitors the activation of Arf1 and Arf6 differentially. These observations reveal that EFA6, BRAG, and cytohesins have unanticipated commonalities associated with divergent regulatory regimes. An important implication is that EFA6 and cytohesins may combine in a mixed negative-positive feedback loop. By allowing EFA6 to sustain a pool of dormant Arf6-GTP, such a circuit would fulfill the absolute requirement of cytohesins for activation by Arf-GTP before amplification of their GEF activity by their positive feedback loop.Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which activate small GTPases by stimulating their intrinsically very slow GDP/GTP exchange, are key players in the extraordinary diversity of small GTPases pathways (reviewed in ref. 1). Small GTPases carry little specificity determinants on their own to determine when and where they should be turned on and which pathway they should activate (2), which are instead largely monitored by their GEFs. Thus, understanding how different members of a GEF family activate an individual small GTPase in distinct patterns is a major issue in small GTPase biology in normal cells and in diseases.An important contribution to the functional specificity of GEFs is how they themselves are regulated. Crystallographic studies combined with biochemical studies that reconstituted GEF-stimulated GDP/GTP nucleotide exchange have been instrumental in uncovering a growing complexity of regulatory mechanisms (reviewed in ref. 1). These include autoinhibitory elements outside the catalytic GEF domain that block access to the active site (3–7), large conformational changes that release autoinhibition in response to various stimuli (8–11), positive feedback loops in which freshly produced GTP-bound GTPases stimulate GDP/GTP exchange (10, 12–15), and potentiation of nucleotide exchange by colocalization on membranes (11, 13, 16, 17).These previous studies demonstrated that a wide range of regulatory regimes can be achieved even at the scale of a single GEF family by regulatory mechanisms that combine in multiple ways. GEFs that activate small GTPases of the Arf family (ArfGEFs), which are major regulators of many aspects of membrane traffic and organelle structure in eukaryotic cells (reviewed in refs. 18 and 19), form one of the best-characterized GEF families to date (reviewed in ref. 1), making a comprehensive view of their regulatory repertoire within reach. ArfGEFs comprise two major groups: the BIG/GBF1 group, which functions at the Golgi, and a group composed of the exchange factor for Arf6 (EFA6), brefeldin A-resistant Arf guanine nucleotide exchange factor (BRAG), and cytohesin subfamilies, which activate Arf GTPases at the cell periphery and function in various aspects of endocytosis (reviewed in ref. 20). The actual substrates of these ArfGEFs have been difficult to establish, notably because the most abundant Arf isoform, Arf1, was long believed to be excluded from the plasma membrane where the Arf6 isoform is located. Accordingly, cytohesins and BRAGs have been described as Arf6-specific GEFs in cells but are now recognized as active Arf1-GEFs (16, 21, 22), whereas EFA6 remains the sole ArfGEF considered to be strictly Arf6-specific (23, 24).Members of the EFA6, BRAG, and cytohesin subfamilies have divergent N-terminal domains but a related domain organization in their C terminus comprising a Sec7 domain, which stimulates GDP/GTP exchange, followed by a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, which has multiple regulatory functions. In cytohesins, the PH domain recognizes signaling phosphoinositides by its canonical lipid-binding site (25), autoinhibits the Sec7 domain by obstructing its Arf-binding site (4), and amplifies nucleotide exchange by a positive feedback loop involving its direct interaction with Arf1-GTP or Arf6-GTP (10, 13, 21). In contrast, the PH domain of BRAG is not autoinhibitory and is not involved in a feedback loop, but instead strongly potentiates nucleotide exchange by binding to polyanionic membranes without marked phosphoinositides preference (16).How members of the EFA6 subfamily are regulated is currently unknown. These ArfGEFs are found predominantly (although not exclusively) in the brain and function in the coordination of endocytosis and actin dynamics (23, 26, 27), in the maintenance of tight junctions (28), in microtubule dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos (29), and in the formation and maintenance of dendrites (30), although the molecular details of these functions remain largely unknown. Consistent with an important role in the brain, defects in EFA6 functions have been found in neurologic disorders (31) and in human gliomas (32). The PH domain of EFA6 subfamily members drives the localization of EFA6 members to the plasma membrane (26) and it binds to PIP₂ lipids (33). It is followed by a 150-residue C-terminal (Ct) domain predicted to form a coiled coil, which massively induces actin-rich membrane protrusions when expressed with the PH domain (26). The divergence of regulatory mechanisms between Sec7-PH–containing cytohesins and BRAGs prompted us to undertake a quantitative biochemical investigation of EFA6 nucleotide exchange regulation. Our findings reveal an overlooked dual specificity of EFA6 for Arf1 and Arf6 and an unprecedented regulation by a negative feedback loop, with important potential implications for the activation of Arf GTPases in endocytic events.     

Crystal structure of the plexin A3 intracellular region reveals an autoinhibited conformation through active site sequestration

Plexin cell surface receptors bind to semaphorin ligands and transduce signals for regulating neuronal axon guidance. The intracellular region of plexins is essential for signaling and contains a R-Ras/M-Ras GTPase activating protein (GAP) domain that is divided into two segments by a Rho GTPase-binding domain (RBD). The regulation mechanisms for plexin remain elusive, although it is known that activation requires both binding of semaphorin to the extracellular region and a Rho-family GTPase (Rac1 or Rnd1) to the RBD. Here we report the crystal structure of the plexin A3 intracellular region. The structure shows that the N- and C-terminal portions of the GAP homologous regions together form a GAP domain with an overall fold similar to other Ras GAPs. However, the plexin GAP domain adopts a closed conformation and cannot accommodate R-Ras/M-Ras in its substrate-binding site, providing a structural basis for the autoinhibited state of plexins. A comparison with the plexin B1 RBD/Rnd1 complex structure suggests that Rnd1 binding alone does not induce a conformational change in plexin, explaining the requirement of both semaphorin and a Rho GTPase for activation. The structure also identifies an N-terminal segment that is important for regulation. Both the N-terminal segment and the RBD make extensive interactions with the GAP domain, suggesting the presence of an allosteric network connecting these three domains that integrates semaphorin and Rho GTPase signals to activate the GAP. The importance of these interactions in plexin signaling is shown by both cell-based and in vivo axon guidance assays.     

The structure, regulation, and function of ZAP-70

Summary:  The tyrosine ZAP-70 (ζ-associated protein of 70 kDa) kinase plays a critical role in activating many downstream signal transduction pathways in T cells following T-cell receptor (TCR) engagement. The importance of ZAP-70 is evidenced by the severe combined immunodeficiency that occurs in ZAP-70-deficient mice and humans. In this review, we describe recent analyses of the ZAP-70 crystal structure, revealing a complex regulatory mechanism of ZAP-70 activity, the differential requirements for ZAP-70 and spleen tyrosine kinase (SyK) in early T-cell development, as well as the role of ZAP-70 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and autoimmunity. Thus, the critical importance of ZAP-70 in TCR signaling and its predominantly T-cell-restricted expression pattern make ZAP-70 an attractive drug target for the inhibition of pathological T-cell responses in disease.