帕罗西汀与氯硝西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症对照研究

目的探讨帕罗西汀与氯硝西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症的疗效与不良反应.方法将63例广泛性焦虑障碍患者随机分为两组.研究组32例给予帕罗西汀治疗;对照组31例给予氯硝西泮治疗,两组疗程均为6w.两组于治疗前和治疗第3,6w末采用焦虑自评量表、汉密顿焦虑量表和副反应量表评定临床疗效与副反应,并进行比较.结果帕罗西汀与氯硝西泮对广泛性焦虑障碍均有明显疗效.两组组内治疗前与治疗第3,6w末汉密顿焦虑量表、焦虑自评量表减分率比较有极显著性差异（P＜0.01）;两组间汉密顿焦虑量表减分率比较无显著性差异（P＞0.05）,焦虑自评量表减分率差异有极显著性（P＜0.01）;治疗第6w末两组副反应量表评分有极显著性差异（P＜0.01）.结论帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍安全有效,患者耐受性好,副反应轻微.     

A Complex Relationship Between Co‐occurring Social Anxiety and Alcohol Use Disorders: What Effect Does Treating Social Anxiety Have on Drinking?

Background: Individuals with social anxiety disorder and co‐occurring alcohol problems report using alcohol to cope with anxiety symptoms. Interventions that reduce both social anxiety and drinking are needed. Paroxetine, an FDA‐approved medication to treat social anxiety disorder, reduces anxiety in individuals with co‐occurring alcohol problems. Objectives: To examine whether effective treatment of social anxiety with paroxetine reduces drinking in dual‐diagnosed individuals who endorse using alcohol to cope. Methods: A 16‐week, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial of paroxetine was conducted. Participants (placebo n = 22; paroxetine n = 20) met DSM‐IV diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder and alcohol abuse or dependence. Participants were seeking treatment for social anxiety, not for the alcohol problem. Alcohol use outcomes were measured with conventional quantity/frequency measures and novel measures of drinking to cope. Results: Paroxetine improved social anxiety more than placebo. Paroxetine reduced self‐reported reliance on alcohol for self‐medication purposes, but was not different than placebo in changing quantity and frequency drinking or the proportion of drinking days that were identified as coping‐related. Exploratory analyses revealed that for the placebo group, drinking during the trial was correlated with social anxiety severity, whereas for the paroxetine‐treated group, drinking was uncoupled from social anxiety severity. Conclusions: Successfully treating social anxiety symptoms with paroxetine does not reduce drinking in dual‐diagnosed individuals who are not seeking treatment for alcohol problems. Paroxetine does, however, reduce reliance on alcohol to engage in social situations, and may change the reasons why one drinks (such that drinking occurs for other reasons besides coping with anxiety). These results have implications for staging of social anxiety and alcohol treatment in individuals with the co‐occurring disorders presenting to a mental health or primary care provider.     

帕罗西汀合并阿立哌唑治疗抑郁症疗效观察

目的评估帕罗西汀合用阿立哌唑治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法67例抑郁症患者随机分为治疗组（n=33）和对照组（n=34）,治疗组给予帕罗西汀联合小剂量阿立哌唑治疗,对照组单用帕罗西汀治疗,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）定期评定,治疗8周。结果治疗组疗效显著优于对照组。结论帕罗西汀联合小剂量阿立哌唑治疗抑郁症效果优于单用帕罗西汀治疗。     

A型肉毒毒素联合帕罗西汀治疗局限性肌张力障碍的临床研究

目的观察A型肉毒毒素联合帕罗西汀对局限性肌张力障碍患者的治疗效果。方法对191例局限性肌张力障碍患者采用回顾及前瞻相结合的方法 ,部分联合使用帕罗西汀在局部注射A型肉毒毒素后起效的潜伏期、注射剂量、疗效持续时间、有效率、副作用进行评价。结果两组患者在潜伏期、注射剂量、有效率、副作用上差异无统计学意义,而使用帕罗西汀后在持续时间上明显长于单纯注射组(P0.01)。结论 A型肉毒毒素联合帕罗西汀在治疗局限性肌张力障碍可以明显延长持续时间,减少注射A型肉毒毒素次数,改善患者的生活质量。     

帕罗西汀对2型糖尿病并发抑郁患者HPA轴的影响

[目的]探讨帕罗西汀对2型糖尿病(T2DM)并发抑郁患者下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴功能的影响.[方法]将70例T2DM抑郁症患者随机分为观察组和对照组各35例.对照组给予糖尿病常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联用帕罗西汀治疗;用药8周后观察两组患者治疗前后血糖控制及抑郁症状改善情况,并检测HPA轴中促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)、肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)及皮质醇(Cor)水平变化.[结果]两组患者空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2h血糖(2hPG)水平及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分均较治疗前明显降低(P＜0.05),且观察组优于对照组(P＜0.05);观察组患者血浆CRH、ACTH、Cor含量均较治疗前明显降低(P＜0.05),与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).[结论]帕罗西汀可有效改善T2DM并发抑郁患者的血糖水平,缓解抑郁情绪,其作用机制可能与调节HPA轴功能有关.     

Paroxetine treatment of compulsive hoarding

OBJECTIVE: Compulsive hoarding, found in many patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), has been associated with poor response to serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) medications in some reports. However, no prior study has quantitatively measured response to standardized pharmacotherapy in compulsive hoarders. We sought to determine whether compulsive hoarders would respond as well as non-hoarding OCD patients to the SRI, paroxetine. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with OCD (32 patients with the compulsive hoarding syndrome and 47 patients without prominent hoarding symptoms) were treated openly with paroxetine (mean dose 41.6+/-12.8 mg/day; mean duration 80.4+/-23.5 days) according to a standardized protocol, from 3/1993 to 7/2005. All subjects were free of psychotropic medication for at least four weeks prior to study entry. No psychotherapy or psychotropic medications except paroxetine were allowed during the study period. Subjects were assessed before and after treatment with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Ham-A), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), and Clinical Global Impression/Improvement (CGI) scale. RESULTS: Both compulsive hoarders and non-hoarding OCD patients improved significantly with treatment (p<0.001), with nearly identical changes in Y-BOCS, HDRS, Ham-A, and GAS scores. There were no significant differences between groups in the proportions of patients who completed or responded to treatment. Hoarding symptoms improved as much as other OCD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Compulsive hoarders responded as well to paroxetine treatment as non-hoarding OCD patients, suggesting that SRI medications are effective for compulsive hoarding. Controlled trials of SRI medications for compulsive hoarding are now warranted.     

帕罗西汀对抑郁模型大鼠不同脑区环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白的影响

目的探讨帕罗西汀在不同用药时间对抑郁模型大鼠海马、前额叶皮质环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白（CREB）磷酸化（p-CREB）及总蛋白（t-CREB）水平的影响。方法成年雄性SpragueDawley大鼠36只，随机分为6组：对照组、抑郁模型组（以下简称模型组）、抑郁模型＋用药1d组（以下简称用药1d组）、抑郁模型＋用药1周组（以下简称用药1周组）、抑郁模型＋用药2周组（以下简称用药2周组）和抑郁模型＋用药4周组（以下简称用药4周组），每组各6只。抑郁模型的制作为强迫大鼠游泳4周，每天1次，每次15min。帕罗西汀的剂量为10m∥kg体质量，灌胃给药，时间分别为1d和1，2，4周，每天1次，于每次游泳前用药。采用Westernblot法检测各组大鼠海马及前额叶皮质的p-CREB和t-CREB水平。结果（1）模型组及用药1d、1周组大鼠海马p-CREB水平明显低于对照组（P〈0．01），用药2，4周组大鼠海马p-CREB水平与对照组的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；模型组及各用药组海马t-CREB水平与对照组的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。（2）模型组及用药1d和1，2周组大鼠前额叶皮质p-CREB水平均明显低于对照组（P〈0．05），用药4周组与对照组的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。模型组及用药1d、1周组大鼠前额叶皮质t-CREB水平与对照组的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），用药2，4周组大鼠前额叶皮质t-CREB水平均明显高于对照组（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）。结论慢性强迫游泳导致大鼠海马及前额叶皮质CREB活性降低，长期使用帕罗西汀可逆转此效应，提高抑郁大鼠前额叶皮质的CREB水平。     

帕罗西汀治疗社交恐惧症的双盲对照研究

目的　比较帕罗西汀与阿普唑仑治疗社交恐惧症的疗效及安全性。方法　将 78例社交恐惧症患者按住院先后顺序分层随机法分为帕罗西汀组 4 0例及阿普唑仑组 38例 ,疗程均为 6周。疗效评定采用PRCA 2 4、CGI SI及临床四级疗效评定。安全性评价应用TESS、实验室检查及体检。结果　帕罗西汀组与阿普唑仑组疗效相当。帕罗西汀常见不良反应为恶心、头痛、口干、出汗、厌食等 ,不良反应程度均较轻 ,患者依从性好。结论　帕罗西汀治疗社交恐惧症安全、有效 ,患者对药物的耐受性及依从性均较好     

脑卒中后情感障碍的心理干预及帕罗西汀治疗的临床研究

目的 探讨脑卒中后情感障碍的发生率、脑卒中部位与情感障碍的关系,以及口服帕罗西汀合并早期心理干预对脑卒中后情感障碍患者日常生活能力和神经功能康复的影响.方法 采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)对181例脑卒中患者进行筛查,对脑卒中后同时出现抑郁和焦虑的54例患者随机分成治疗组和对照组,在接受脑血管病常规治疗的基础上,治疗组加用帕罗西汀和心理干预.采用斯堪的那维亚脑卒中量表(SSS)、Barthel指数(BI)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)分别于治疗前、治疗后2周、4周及6周末进行评测.结果 181例患者中发生情感障碍81例(44.75 %),其中66.67%(54例)同时出现抑郁和焦虑,情感障碍的发生与额叶、左侧大脑半球、基底节病灶有关(P<0.05～0.001);治疗后治疗组HAMD、HAMA、SSS评分减少和BI评分增加,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01),治疗后2～6周显效率显著优于对照组(P<0.05～0.01).结论 脑卒中后抑郁/焦虑的发生与脑卒中部位相关;对脑卒中后抑郁/焦虑的患者应用帕罗西汀合并心理干预治疗能显著提高患者神经功能康复程度,促进生活能力的恢复.     

帕罗西汀治疗脑卒中后抑郁障碍的临床疗效

目的：探讨脑卒中后抑郁障碍患者接受帕罗西汀治疗的临床效果。方法脑卒中后抑郁障碍患者126例随机分为治疗组和对照组各63例,对照组给予脑卒中常规药物治疗,治疗组在对照组的基础上给予帕罗西汀治疗。比较2组治疗前、治疗2周、4周、8周后的汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评分,以及治疗前后日常生活能力Barthel指数（BI）评分、神经功能缺损（SSS ）评分。结果2组治疗8周后BI评分均增加,SSS评分均减少（ P＜0.05）,治疗组较对照组的变化更显著（ P＜0.05）。治疗组治疗4周、8周后HAMD评分均较治疗前降低（P＜0.05）,与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论帕罗西汀治疗脑卒中后抑郁障碍患者疗效确切,值得临床推广。