Evaluation of levetiracetam and valproic acid as low-dose monotherapies for children with typical benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the monotherapeutic efficacies of levetiracetam (LEV) and valproic acid (VPA) in a cohort of newly diagnosed children with typical benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS).MethodsA total of 56 children with typical BECTS were retrospectively reviewed in the analyses. Thirty-three children received LEV and 23 received VPA as initial monotherapy, and the treatments lasted for at least 18 months.ResultsThe average dosage of LEV was 22.7 ± 4.7 mg/kg/day, and that of VPA was 18.7 ± 5.7 mg/kg/day. The seizure-freedom rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (57.5% vs. 60.9%), 12 (81.8% vs. 73.9%) or 18 months (100% vs. 100%). However, a greater number of the children taking VPA achieved Electroencephalography (EEG) normalization compared to those taking LEV both at 12 (78.3% vs. 45.5%) and 18 months (95.7% vs. 72.7%; p < 0.05). No children discontinued therapy due to adverse effects during the follow-up. Only one child (4.7%) in the VPA group exhibited mild weight gain (BMI increase of 2 at the end of follow-up) but did not withdraw from treatment.ConclusionLow-dosage VPA and LEV monotherapies are equally effective in controlling seizures, but VPA exhibited better efficacy than LEV in improving the electrophysiological abnormalities of children with BECTS. None of the patients discontinued therapy, which was likely due to the administration of low dosages.     

Symptomatic efficacy of rasagiline monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease: Post-hoc analyses from the ADAGIO trial

BackgroundThe ADAGIO study included a large cohort of patients with early PD (baseline total-UPDRS = 20) who were initially randomized to rasagiline and placebo, thereby allowing analyses of symptomatic efficacy.MethodsPost-hoc analyses comparing the efficacy of rasagiline 1 mg/day (n = 288) versus placebo (n = 588) on key symptoms at 36 weeks, and on total-UPDRS scores over 72 weeks (completer population: rasagiline 1 mg/day n = 221, placebo n = 392) were performed.ResultsTreatment with rasagiline resulted in significantly better tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and postural-instability-gait-difficulty scores at week 36 versus placebo. Whereas the placebo group experienced progressive deterioration from baseline (2.6 UPDRS points at week 36), patients in the rasagiline group were maintained at baseline values at week 60 (UPDRS-change of 0.3 points). At week 72, patients who had received continuous monotherapy with rasagiline experienced a worsening of only 1.6 points.ConclusionsTreatment with rasagiline maintained motor function to baseline values for at least a year with significant benefits observed in all key PD motor symptoms.     

Lacosamide for children with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia

ObjectivesThis study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD) in children.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of pediatric PKD patients (aged <16 years) treated with LCM. Data regarding demographic characteristics, proline-rich transmembrane protein 2 (PRRT2) gene variant, clinical features of PKD, dose of LCM, efficacy, and adverse events were recorded.ResultsFour eligible patients (3 males, 1 female) were identified, with an age of onset ranging from 8.3 to 14.7 years. PRRT2 variant was evaluated in three children and a c.649dupC variant was identified in one child with a positive family history. Attacks were bilateral in three children and left-sided in one. Two children had a family history of PKD and one child had a family history of benign infantile epilepsy. Treatment with carbamazepine failed in two children due to drowsiness and auditory disturbance. The initial dose of LCM was 50 mg/day in three children and 100 mg/day in one. All patients were attack-free within a few days. The maintenance dose was mostly similar to the initial dose. No adverse events related to LCM were reported during follow-up.ConclusionsLCM is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for PKD in children, and low-dose treatment may be viable.     

6类降压药固定低剂量的单药降压疗效比较

目的:为医师选择降压药提供参考。方法:比较370例原发性高血压患者应用6类15种单药治疗的降压疗效。结果:除多沙唑嗪外,各单药均有效降压;多沙唑嗪和托拉塞米降舒张压的效果较逊。结论:长效钙拮抗药、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体拮抗药以及特拉唑嗪、吲达帕胺均能单药有效降压。低剂量多沙唑嗪和托拉塞米不建议单独使用治疗高血压。     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Clobazam Has Equivalent Efficacy to Carbamazepine and Phenytoin as Monotherapy for Childhood Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of mono-therapy clobazam (CLB) to carbamazepine (CBZ) and phenytoin (PHT) in children with epilepsy.
Methods: Children aged 2–16 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy or previous failure of one drug (for poor efficacy or side effects) were assigned to one of two study arms and then randomized–CLB versus CBZ or CLB versus PHT. Eligible children had partial epilepsies or only generalized tonic-clonic seizures. After a drug initiation protocol, monotherapy treatment mimicked the usual routines used by Canadian child neurologists. Blinding used a "double dummy" technique with blinded medication serum levels (6–point scale). Intention to treat analysis using survival curves assessed the primary end-point–length of retention on the initial medication during the year after randomization.
Results: Fifteen centers entered 235 patients: 159 randomized to CLB versus CBZ and 76 to CLB versus PHT. Altogether, in all study arms, 119 received CLB, 78 CBZ, and 38 PHT. Overall, 56% continued to receive the original medication for l year with no difference between CLB and standard therapy (CBZ and PHT). Seizure control was equivalent for all three medications, as were side effects. PHT and CBZ induced more biologic side effects, such as rash, while CLB induced slightly more behavioral effects. Tolerance developed in 7.5% of patients receiving CLB, 4.2% with CBZ and 6.7% with PHT.
Conclusions: CLB should be considered as "first line" monotherapy along with CBZ and PHT for all partial and selected generalized childhood epilepsies.     

Lamotrigine monotherapy compared with carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate monotherapy in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with monotherapy with conventional antiepileptic drugs in patients converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. METHODS: This study was conducted in 26 neurology clinics and epilepsy centers throughout the United States. The study enrolled 115 patients with epilepsy converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy or monotherapy with a conventional antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate based on physician's choice). Patients were converted during an 相似文献   

Phase-II Trial Using Gemcitabine as Monochemotherapy in Patients with Metastasized Pancreatic Carcinoma

Summary BACKGROUND: The aim of this phase-II study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine monochemotherapy in patients with metastasized pancreatic carcinoma known to have a poor overall tumor response rate to chemotherapy in order to achieve an improvement in the quality of life. METHODS: In 28 patients with metastasized pancreatic carcinoma (mean age, 63.7 years; range, 37 to 77 years; sex ratio, 13 males, 15 females), systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine (dose, 1000 mg/m²) was administered on day 1, 8 and 15. After one further week (day 29), the cycle was repeated. After each 2nd cycle, extension of tumor growth (restaging) including radiological imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, plain film of the thorax) and laboratory analysis (tumor marker) was performed. Frequency, severity and spectrum of side effects were assessed according to WHO grading prior to each treatment. Quality of life was evaluated using standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: All in all, 106 chemotherapeutic cycles were administered in 28 patients (range, 1–18 cycles; mean, 3.78). While in no patient complete remission was observed, 2 out of 28 patients showed partial remission (7.2 %). In 11 out of 28 patients, stable tumor disease was detected (39.2 %). Fifteen out of 28 patients (53.6 %) showed progressive tumor growth. Four out of 28 patients lived longer than 1 year (1-year survival rate, 14.3 %). Side effects of the chemotherapy were only moderate. Only in 26 of 106 cycles (26.5 %), side effects were documented. Significant improvement in the quality of life was reported in 25 % of the treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy using gemcitabine is a well tolerable treatment option with a minimal rate of side effects in the case of metastasized pancreatic carcinoma. However, overall response rate is low. Even considering the acceptable median survival time of 9.1 months most likely caused by second-line chemotherapy, optimization of gemcitabine monotherapy appears to be required using a combination with a further potential cytostatic drug.     

The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. METHODS: Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of >or=12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients >or=12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.