Effect of altered sagittal-plane knee kinematics on loading during the early stance phase of gait

BackgroundIndividuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) show various dynamic sagittal-plane changes during the early stance phase of gait. However, the effect of these kinematic alterations on knee load during the early stance remains poorly understood. Research question: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of altered sagittal- plane knee kinematics on knee load during the early stance.MethodsA total of 13 healthy adult men underwent gait analysis trials using four conditions (baseline and three altered conditions). The three altered conditions were defined as follows:1) Less flexion (LF): a gait that decreased knee flexion excursion (KFE) owing to a reduced peak knee flexion angle compared to baseline.2) Initial flexion (IF): a gait with decreased KFE owing to an increased knee flexion angle at initial contact, during which the peak knee flexion angle did not differ from baseline.3) Flexion gait (FG): a gait that increased the knee flexion angle at initial contact but did not reduce KFE compared with the baseline.Data analyzed included peak external knee flexion moment (KFM), KFM impulse (impulse was an integral value from initial contact to peak value), peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and maximum loading rate.ResultsBoth LF and IF conditions significantly decreased peak VGRF (p < 0.05) compared with the baseline. Peak KFM decreased in the LF condition and increased in the FG condition versus baseline (p < 0.05). A significantly increased KFM impulse was found in both IF and FG conditions when compared with baseline (p < 0.05).SignificanceAn increase in knee flexion angle during early stance increased knee loading. Interventions are likely required for improving excessive knee flexion during early stance phase of gait in individuals with knee OA.     

Changes in the control of obstacle crossing in middle age become evident as gait task difficulty increases

BackgroundAge-associated physiological changes result in modified gait, such as slower speed, for older adults. Identifying the onset of age-related gait changes will provide insight into the role of aging on locomotor control. It is expected that a more challenging gait task (obstacle crossing) puts more demands on physiological systems, and may reveal gait modifications in a middle-aged group that are not evident in an easier gait task (level walking).Research questionTo identify the effect of advancing age on gait as a function of increasing locomotor challenge during an obstacle crossing task.MethodsThree age groups (young, middle-aged, and older adults) stepped over an obstacle placed in a 15 m walkway. Task challenge ranged from low to high in four conditions: unobstructed gait, 3, 10, and 26 cm obstacles. Gait measures were calculated during the approach and crossing steps.ResultsSignificant interactions were observed for gait speed (age by height by step, p < 0.01), foot placement variability (age by step, p < 0.01) and foot clearance (age by height, p = 0.05). Relative to young adults, older adults walked slower in all conditions and had higher foot clearances for the 10 and 26 cm obstacles. Middle-aged adults walked with speeds and foot clearances that were not different from young adults in the lower gait challenge conditions, and changed to values that were not different from older adults in the highest gait challenge conditions. Foot placement variability was greater for the middle-aged and older groups, but only in the last two steps before the obstacle.SignificanceMultiple gait changes were observed as early as middle-age, and changes in speed and foot clearance became more evident as task difficulty increased. The increased gait challenge placed more demands on the neuromuscular system, revealing age-related gait modifications that were not evident in the level walking gait task.     

Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait

The movement of surface mounted targets (SMT) on a shell at the mid-shank and of bone mounted targets attached to the distal shank using a Percutaneous Skeletal Tracker (PST) were simultaneously measured during free-speed walking of three adult subjects having different body types. Surface movement errors in shank kinematic estimates were determined by expressing the segmental motion derived from the SMT relative to the PST-based segment coordinate system (SCS) located at the segment center of gravity. The greatest errors were along and around the shank longitudinal axis, with peak magnitudes of 10 mm of translation and 8° of rotation in one subject. Estimates of knee joint center locations differed by less than 11 mm in each SCS direction. Differences in estimates of net knee joint forces and moments were most prominent during stance phase, with magnitudes up to 39 N in the shank mediolateral direction and 9 N.m about the mediolateral axis. The differences in kinetics were primarily related to the effect of segment position and orientation on the expression of joint forces and on the magnitude and expression of joint moments.     

Reliability and comparison of trunk and pelvis angles,arm distance and center of pressure in the seated functional reach test with and without foot support in children

This study determined test-retest reliability of trunk and pelvis joint angles, arm distance and center of pressure (COP) excursion for the seated functional reach test (FRT) and compared these variables during the seated FRT with and without foot support. Fifteen typically developing children (age 9.3 ± 4.1 years) participated. Trunk and pelvis joint angles, arm distance, and COP excursion were collected on two days using three-dimensional motion analysis and a force plate while subjects reached maximally with and without foot support in the anterior, anterior/lateral, lateral, posterior/lateral directions. Age, weight, height, trunk and arm lengths were correlated (p < 0.01) with maximum arm distance reached. Maximum arm distance, trunk and pelvis joint angles, and COP with and without foot support were not significant (p < 0.05) for the two test periods. Excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.75) was found for maximum arm distance reached in all four directions in the seated FRT with and without foot support. Most trunk and pelvis joint angles and COP excursions during maximum reach in all four directions showed excellent to fair reliability (ICCs > 0.40–0.75). Reaching with foot support in all directions was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than without foot support; however, most COP excursions and trunk and pelvic angles were not significantly different. Findings support the addition of anterior/lateral and posterior/lateral reaching directions in the seated FRT. Trunk and pelvis movement analysis is important to examine in the seated FRT to determine the specific movement strategies needed for maximum reaching without loss of balance.     

Test–retest reliability of sensor-based sit-to-stand measures in young and older adults

This study investigated test–retest reliability of sensor-based sit-to-stand (STS) peak power and other STS measures in young and older adults. In addition, test–retest reliability of the sensor method was compared to test–retest reliability of the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) and Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in older adults. Ten healthy young female adults (20–23 years) and 31 older adults (21 females; 73–94 years) participated in two assessment sessions separated by 3–8 days. Vertical peak power was assessed during three (young adults) and five (older adults) normal and fast STS trials with a hybrid motion sensor worn on the hip. Older adults also performed the FTSST and TUGT. The average sensor-based STS peak power of the normal STS trials and the average sensor-based STS peak power of the fast STS trials showed excellent test–retest reliability in young adults (intra-class correlation (ICC) ≥ 0.90; zero in 95% confidence interval of mean difference between test and retest (95%CI of D); standard error of measurement (SEM) ≤ 6.7% of mean peak power) and older adults (ICC ≥ 0.91; zero in 95%CI of D; SEM ≤ 9.9%). Test–retest reliability of sensor-based STS peak power and TUGT (ICC = 0.98; zero in 95%CI of D; SEM = 8.5%) was comparable in older adults, test–retest reliability of the FTSST was lower (ICC = 0.73; zero outside 95%CI of D; SEM = 14.4%). Sensor-based STS peak power demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability and may therefore be useful for clinical assessment of functional status and fall risk.     

The influence of different force and pressure measuring transducers on lower extremity kinematics measured during walking

The examination of synchronous three dimensional (3-D) kinetics and kinematics of walking in laboratory based analyses typically requires participants/patients to make foot contact with a force or pressure measuring device. However, it has been proposed that this may lead to targeting whereby participants modify their natural gait pattern in order to ensure contact with the device. This study aimed to determine the extent to which an embedded force plate (EFP) and two different pressure mats (PMs) affect natural gait kinematics. Male participants (n = 12, age 24.23 SD 4.22 years, height 1.74 m SD 0.10, mass 75.78 SD 6.90 kg) walked at a velocity of 1.25 m s⁻¹ along a 22 m walkway in four different conditions. (1) EFP, (2) FootScan (FS) PM, (3) MatScan (MS) PM, (4) no device (ND). 3-D angular kinematic parameters were collected using an eight camera motion analysis system. Differences in kinematics were examined using repeated measures ANOVAs. Significant differences were observed in hip abduction, knee flexion/extension and knee abduction between various conditions and may warrant consideration in future research. No significant differences were reported at the ankle joint in any conditions. Comparing the PMs, no significant differences were observed, however, significant differences between the MS and the EFP and ND conditions were identified. The research supports the efficacy of collecting gait kinematics at the ankle joint and in most variables measured at the knee and hip joints.     

A portable system for foot biomechanical analysis during gait

Modeling the foot is challenging due to its complex structure compared to most other body segments. To analyze the biomechanics of the foot, portable devices have been designed to allow measurement of temporal, spatial, and pedobarographic parameters. The goal of this study was to design and evaluate a portable system for kinematic and dynamic analysis of the foot during gait. This device consisted of a force plate synchronized with four cameras and integrated into a walkway. The complete system can be packaged for transportation. First, the measurement system was assessed using reference objects to evaluate accuracy and precision. Second, nine healthy participants were assessed during gait trials using both the portable and Vicon systems (coupled with a force plate). The ankle and metatarsophalangeal (MP) joint angles and moments were computed, as well as the ground reaction force (GRF). The intra- and inter-subject variability was analyzed for both systems, as well as the inter-system variation. The accuracy and precision were, respectively 0.4 mm and 0.4 mm for linear values and 0.5° and 0.6° for angular values. The variability of the portable and Vicon systems were similar (i.e., the inter-system variability never exceeded 2.1°, 0.081 N m kg⁻¹ and 0.267 N kg⁻¹ for the angles, moments and GRF, respectively). The inter-system differences were less than the inter-subject variability and similar to the intra-subject variability. Consequently, the portable system was considered satisfactory for biomechanical analysis of the foot, outside of a motion analysis laboratory.     

Measuring unconscious actions in action-blindsight: exploring the kinematics of pointing movements to targets in the blind field of two patients with cortical hemianopia

We tested two patients with posterior cerebral lesions on two pointing tasks. In the first task, the patients pointed to targets presented on a touch screen monitor and pointing accuracy was recorded. One patient (JR) demonstrated good localisation of targets presented to her blind field while the other patient (YP) did not. Movement kinematics were measured in the second task to compare the kinematics of movements made to sighted field targets with those made to blind field targets. For this version of the task both patients demonstrated above chance localisation of blind field targets although the slope of the relationship between the end of pointing movements and the target locations was significantly steeper for JR than for YP. Furthermore, JR showed a kinematic profile for movements made to blind field targets that mirrored the profile of kinematics to sighted field targets. That is, both peak velocity and time to peak velocity increased with increasing target eccentricity for movements made to blind and sighted field targets alike. Although patient YP now showed more reliable spatial localisation on this pointing task when compared with the touch screen task, his kinematics for movements made to targets in his blind field were quite different from those made to targets in his sighted field. Based on the patients' CT scans, we suggest that the superior performance of patient JR is a consequence of greater sparing of her parietal cortex in the damaged hemisphere.     

Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during learning of fast and accurate elbow flexions

Learning of a motor task, such as making accurate goal-directed movements, is associated with a number of changes in limb kinematics and in the EMG activity that produces the movement. Some of these changes include increases in movement velocity, improvements in end-point accuracy, and the development of a biphasic/triphasic EMG pattern for fast movements. One question that has remained unanswered is whether the time course of the learning-related changes in movement parameters is similar for all parameters. The present paper focuses on this question and presents evidence that different parameters evolve with a specific temporal order. Neurologically normal subjects were trained to make horizontal, planar movements of the elbow that were both fast and accurate. The performance of the subjects was monitored over the course of 400 movements made during experiments lasting approximately 1.5 h. We measured time-related parameters (duration of acceleration, duration of deceleration, and movement duration) and amplitude-related parameters (peak acceleration, peak deceleration, peak velocity), as well as movement distance. In addition, each subject’s reaction time and EMG activity was monitored. We found that reaction time was the parameter that changed the fastest and that reached a steady baseline earliest. Time-related parameters decreased at a somewhat slower rate and plateaued next. Amplitude-related parameters were slowest in reaching steady-state values. In subjects making the fastest movements, a triphasic EMG patterns was observed to develop. Our findings reveal that movement parameters change with different time courses during the process of motor learning. The results are discussed in terms of the neural substrates that may be responsible for the differences in this aspect of motor learning and skill acquisition. Received: 28 December 1998 / Accepted: 22 June 1999     

Movement precues in planning and execution of aiming movements in Parkinson's disease

Two experiments tested how changing a planned movement affects movement initiation and execution in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. In Experiment 1, PD patients, elderly controls, and young adults performed discrete aiming movements to one of two targets on a digitizer. A precue (80% valid cue and 20% invalid cue of all trials) reflecting the subsequent movement direction was presented prior to the imperative stimulus. All groups produced slower reaction times (RTs) to the invalid precue condition. Only the subgroup of patients with slowest movement time showed a significant prolongation of movement for the invalid condition. This suggests that, in the most impaired patients, modifying a planned action also affects movement execution. In Experiment 2, two-segment aiming movements were used to increase the demand on movement planning. PD patients and elderly controls underwent the two precue conditions (80% valid, 20% invalid). Patients exhibited longer RTs than the controls. RT was similarly increased for the invalid condition in both groups. The patients, however, exhibited longer movement times, lower peak velocities, and higher normalized jerk scores of the first segment in the invalid condition compared to the valid condition. Conversely, the controls showed no difference between the valid and invalid cue conditions. Thus, PD patients demonstrated substantially pronounced movement slowness and variability when required to change a planned action. The results from both experiments suggest that modifying a planned action may continue beyond the initiation phase into the execution phase in PD patients.