Post-traumatic epidural hematoma in two patients with long-standing “arrested” hydrocephalus

The occurrence of a post-traumatic epidural hematoma in two patients with long-standing arrested hydrocephalus is reported. There was a relatively long interval between the head injury and the onset of symptoms. The large hematoma was accommodated by the decrease in size of the markedly dilated ventricles. This report stresses the possibility of the presence of an epidural hematoma in the management of head injury in patients with long-standing arrested hydrocephalus.     

Spread of epidural analgesia following a constant pressure injection

(1) The spread of epidural analgesia following injection of 15ml of 2% mepivacaine was 17.3 ± 0.6, 14.3 ± 0.4, and 13.3 ± 0.7 spinal segments in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar epidural analgesia, respectively. The patients age showed significant correlation with the spread of epidural analgesia in cervical (r = 0.5776, p < 0.001), thoracic (r = 0.3758, p < 0.01), and lumbar area (r = 0.8195, p < 0.001). The spread of cervical epidural analgesia was more caudad than cephalad (p < 0.05), but in lumbar epidural analgesia it was more cephalad than caudad (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the cephalad and caudad spread in thoracic epidural analgesia.(2) The epidural pressure immediately after injection of 15ml of 2% mepivacaine into the lumbar epidural space at a constant pressure (80mmHg) correlated to the patients age (r = –0.5714, p < 0.001) and the spread of analgesia (r = –0.3904, p < 0.05). The lower epidural pressure associated with higher age, the wider spread of analgesia. There was no significant correlation between the residual pressure at 60 seconds and the age or the spread of analgesia.(Hirabayashi Y et al.: Spread of epidural analgesia following a constant pressure injection: an investigation of relationships between locus of injection, epidural pressure and spread of analgesia. J Anesth 1: 44–50, 1987)     

Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of epidural analgesia

The relationships between the epidural pressures following the injection of local anesthetic solution and the spread of epidural analgesia were investigated. In 46 patients, 15ml of 2% mepivacaine was injected into the lumbar epidural space at a constant rate (1ml/sec) using an electropowered syringe pump. Injection pressures and residual pressures were recorded and the spread of analgesia to pinprick was assessed. The changes of the epidural pressures during and following the injection of a volume of local anesthetic solution in old subjects were significantly smaller than those in young subjects (P < 0.05). The spread of analgesia closely correlated with the epidural pressures during and following the injection of local anesthetic solution. The most close correlation was found between the epidural pressure immediately after the completion of injection and the spread of analgesia (r = –0.5659, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the lower the terminal injection pressure and the residual pressures associated with higher age, the wider the spread of epidural analgesia.(Hirabayashi Y, Matsuda I, Inoue S et al.: Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of epidural analgesia. J Anesth 1: 168–172, 1987)     

Hematoma subdural intracraneal tras punción dural accidental: caso clínico

Intracranial subdural hematoma is a rare, but potentially lethal complication of neuraxial procedures. Considering the high frequency of neuraxial techniques in the obstetric population, parturients are more susceptible to this fearful complication. The diagnosis is often masked and delayed because it shares similar clinical characteristics with posdural puncture headache, with headache being the most common symptom. This case report describes a timely diagnosis and successful management of an intracranial subdural hematoma, after unintentional dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia. Postpartum headache following epidural analgesia, remains a clinical challenge for the caring team, requiring a close follow-up and awareness for non-benign causes that require prompt management, avoiding devastating consequences.     

Optimum dose of epidural morphine for postsurgical analgesia

To determine the optimum dose of epidural morphine for postoperative pain control, 0.5–4.0mg of morphine was administered to 198 patients who had undergone operations on lower abdomen or lower extremities under continuous epidural anesthesia. Analgesic effect of morphine and incidence of nausea or vomiting were studied using linear discriminant analysis. As explanatory variables, age and dose of morphine were statistically significant in discriminating analgesic effect of morphine. Among indices for physique of patients, height was the most useful for predicting the analgesic effect. The dose which made the discriminant function zero corresponded to the minimum effective dose (MED) of morphine and it was expressed as follows; MED (mg·meter^–1) = –0.0107 × age + 1.85. Predicting the incidence of nausea or vomiting in relation to the dose of morphine did not reach a level of statistical significance.(Ochi G, Yamane C, Arai T: Optimum dose of epidural morphine for postsurgical analgesia. J Anesth 4: 35–39, 1990)     

Percutaneous burrhole trephination of the skull: a study of 519 cases

We want to report on our experiences with the percutaneous trephination using a 2.35 mm round dental drill with serrated saws around it, a Rosenbohrer. It is a methodically similar activity as described by J. Zentner [11].From 1981 to 1992 519 patients were treated and 546 trephinations were performed.At the beginning this treatment was only used in connection with intracerebral bleedings and biopsies.In a considerable short time the indication could be extended to the subdural hematoma, tumor cyst, obstructive hydrocephalus as well as to the abscess and the subdural epyema.The rate of infection was 1.28% and the risk of bleeding 0.36%.In our opinion the advantages of this small electrical trephination are the easy handling, the universal use and mobility and the avoidable risk of anesthesia as well as the sterilisation at the same time and the stopping of blood, caused by the contact surface friction.     

Emergency ventilation using the Combitube in cases of difficult intubation

Summary The esophageal-tracheal Combitube (Sheridan, Argyle, NY) is a new device for emergency intubation, which can be inserted blindly without the use of a laryngoscope. Ventilation is independent of the position of the Combitube in either the esophagus or the trachea, since ventilation is always provided by the tube's double channel. The tracheal channel acts as a conventional endotracheal airway and has an open distal end. The esophageal channel has a blocked distal end, so that together with the inflated distal cuff it acts as an esophageal obturator in cases of esophageal intubation. Perforations at the pharyngeal section direct the airflow to the trachea. At the oropharyngeal section a large elastic balloon is positioned in order to obturate the oral cavity and the nasopharynx. Two patients are described to exemplify the Combitube's clinical use. Both had rapidly enlarging cervical hematomas causing upper airway obstruction and thus requiring immediate intubation. Endotracheal intubation failed because the glottis could not be visualized with a laryngoscope. In both cases the Combitube was applied successfully and adequate ventilation was provided via the Combitube placed esophageally. To better secure each patient's airway, tracheotomy was performed during ventilation without any complications.     

Epidural administration and analgesic spread: Comparison of injection with catheters and needles

This study was designed to investigate differences in epidural analgesic spread between catheter and needle injections in 48 patients with comparable physical characteristics. The spread of analgesia in the catheter injection group with a 0.24ml·sec^–1 injection rate (n = 16) was 16.8 ± 1.5 spinal segments and that in the needle injection group at the same injection rate (n = 16) was 12.5 ± 1.8 spinal segments (P 0.01). Needle injection at the faster rate of 1.2ml*237sec^–1 (n = 16) produced a significantly greater spread of analgesia than with the 0.24ml·sec^–1 rate through the needle (16.2 ± 1.6 vs 12.5 ± 1.8 spinal segments, P 0.01). Thirteen of 16 patients receiving the fast needle injection complained of back compression or discomfort during the injection.The injection through an epidural catheter and the fast (1.2ml·sec^–1) injection through a needle produced extensive and equivalent epidural analgesic spread. However, because of patients discomfort with fast injection through the needle, the authors conclude that when using continuous epidural anesthesia, the initial injection of local anesthetic should be administered through the epidural catheter not the needle.(Omote K, Namiki A, Iwasaki H: Epidural administration and analgesic spread: comparison of injection with catheters and needles. J Anesth 6: 289–293, 1992)