Recombinant human ADAMTS13 treatment and anti‐NET strategies enhance skin allograft survival in mice

Enhancing skin allograft longevity lessens the need for new allografts before optimal intervention is available. Reduced activity of ADAMTS13 (an enzyme that cleaves the pro‐thrombotic and proinflammatory von Willebrand factor) and presence of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been implicated in liver and lung allograft failures. The effect of ADAMTS13 treatment and the impact of NETs on skin allografts, however, remain unexplored. Here, we adopted a murine model of complete mismatch full‐thickness skin transplant by grafting dorsal skin from BALB/c mice to C57BL/6J background mice. Recombinant human ADAMTS13 (rhADAMTS13) treatment of graft recipients increased allograft survival. Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy revealed the presence of NETs in allografts of vehicle, but surprisingly, not in rhADAMTS13‐treated mice, 3 days after surgery. Recapitulating the observations in mice, NETs were also observed in all the examined allografts from burn patients. Intriguingly, knocking out peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4, a key enzyme for NET formation) or DNase 1 treatment (which cleaves NETs) also prolonged allograft survival. In summary, rhADAMTS13 lessens inflammation in allografts by reducing NET burden, resulting in enhanced allograft survival. RhADAMTS13 and anti‐NET treatments could be new therapeutic strategies to promote skin allograft longevity and, hence, the survival of patients with severe burns.     

Donor‐specific chimeric antigen receptor Tregs limit rejection in naive but not sensitized allograft recipients

Cell therapy with autologous donor‐specific regulatory T cells (Tregs) is a promising strategy to minimize immunosuppression in transplant recipients. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology has recently been used successfully to generate donor‐specific Tregs and overcome the limitations of enrichment protocols based on repetitive stimulations with alloantigens. However, the ability of CAR‐Treg therapy to control alloreactivity in immunocompetent recipients is unknown. We first analyzed the effect of donor‐specific CAR Tregs on alloreactivity in naive, immunocompetent mice receiving skin allografts. Tregs expressing an irrelevant or anti‐HLA‐A2‐specific CAR were administered to Bl/6 mice at the time of transplanting an HLA‐A2⁺ Bl/6 skin graft. Donor‐specific CAR‐Tregs, but not irrelevant‐CAR Tregs, significantly delayed skin rejection and diminished donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) and frequencies of DSA‐secreting B cells. Donor‐specific CAR‐Treg–treated mice also had a weaker recall DSA response, but normal responses to an irrelevant antigen, demonstrating antigen‐specific suppression. When donor‐specific CAR Tregs were tested in HLA‐A2‐sensitized mice, they were unable to delay allograft rejection or diminish DSAs. The finding that donor‐specific CAR‐Tregs restrain de novo but not memory alloreactivity has important implications for their use as an adoptive cell therapy in transplantation.     

Kidney retransplantation after anti–programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)–related allograft rejection

In this report, we describe the first kidney retransplantation performed after anti–programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)–related allograft rejection. In 2014, we administered pembrolizumab (anti–PD‐1) for ~9 months to a 57‐year‐old kidney transplant recipient with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). The patient experienced both a complete antitumor response and T cell–mediated allograft rejection requiring reinitiation of hemodialysis. Four‐and‐a‐half years after initiating pembrolizumab, the patient remained without evidence of CSCC relapse and received a kidney transplant from a living‐unrelated donor. Ten‐and‐a‐half months after kidney retransplantation, the allograft is functioning well and the patient's CSCC remains in remission. This case illustrates the potential for PD‐1 blockade to bring about durable immune‐mediated tumor control in chronically immunosuppressed patients, and begins to address the feasibility of kidney retransplantation in patients who have previously received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer. Results from this and future cases may help elucidate mechanisms of antitumor immunity and allograft tolerance, and inform updates to transplant decision models. Our report also underscores the need for clinical trials testing novel immunotherapy combinations in solid organ transplant recipients designed to uncouple antitumor and anti‐allograft immunity.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin significantly reduces exposure of concomitantly administered anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody tesidolumab

Awareness of drug‐drug interactions is critical in organ transplant recipient management. However, biologic agents interfering with monoclonal antibodies is not widely considered. We report the effect of high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the human anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody tesidolumab (LFG316) in end‐stage renal disease patients awaiting kidney transplant. In this single‐center, phase 1, open‐label, parallel‐group study, 8 patients were assigned to receive either single‐dose tesidolumab + IVIg or tesidolumab alone, with 56‐day follow‐up. Within‐group PK parameters were consistent. Mean tesidolumab exposure decreased 34%, clearance increased 63%, and half‐life decreased 41% comparing tesidolumab + IVIg to tesidolumab alone. IVIg influence on tesidolumab elimination was most evident in the first 3 weeks. Complete suppression of both total and alternative complement activities was maintained for 4 weeks in the tesidolumab alone group and for 2 weeks in the tesidolumab + IVIg group. Tesidolumab was well tolerated. IVIg infused before tesidolumab affected tesidolumab PK and PD, resulting in a shortened period of full complement activity inhibition. These findings suggest a clinically relevant impact of IVIg on monoclonal antibody clearance and indirectly hint at an IVIg mechanism of action in treating autoimmune diseases and allosensitization by accelerating pathogenic IgG antibody degradation. Trial registration number: NCT02878616.     

Treatment with 3‐aminobenzamide during ex vivo lung perfusion of damaged rat lungs reduces graft injury and dysfunction after transplantation

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) with pharmacological reconditioning may increase donor lung utilization for transplantation (LTx). 3‐Aminobenzamide (3‐AB), an inhibitor of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP), reduces ex vivo lung injury in rat lungs damaged by warm ischemia (WI). Here we determined the effects of 3‐AB reconditioning on graft outcome after LTx. Three groups of donor lungs were studied: Control (Ctrl): 1 hour WI + 3 hours cold ischemia (CI) + LTx; EVLP: 1 hour WI + 3 hours EVLP + LTx; EVLP + 3‐AB: 1 hour WI + 3 hours EVLP + 3‐AB (1 mg^.mL^?1) + LTx. Two hours after LTx, we determined lung graft compliance, edema, histology, neutrophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), mRNA levels of adhesion molecules within the graft, as well as concentrations of interleukin‐6 and 10 (IL‐6, IL‐10) in BAL and plasma. 3‐AB reconditioning during EVLP improved compliance and reduced lung edema, neutrophil infiltration, and the expression of adhesion molecules within the transplanted lungs. 3‐AB also attenuated the IL‐6/IL‐10 ratio in BAL and plasma, supporting an improved balance between pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory mediators. Thus, 3‐AB reconditioning during EVLP of rat lung grafts damaged by WI markedly reduces inflammation, edema, and physiological deterioration after LTx, supporting the use of PARP inhibitors for the rehabilitation of damaged lungs during EVLP.     

Extracellular nucleotide signaling in solid organ transplantation

The role of extracellular purine nucleotides, including adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine, as modulators of posttransplantation outcome and ischemia‐reperfusion injury is becoming increasingly evident. Upon pathological release of ATP, binding and activation of P2 purinergic surface receptors promote tissue injury and inflammation, while the expression and activation of P1 receptors for adenosine have been shown to attenuate inflammation and limit ischemia‐induced damage, which are central to the viability and long‐term success of allografts. Here we review the current state of the transplant field with respect to the role of extracellular nucleotide signaling, with a focus on the sources and functions of extracellular ATP. The connection between ischemia reperfusion, purinergic signaling, and graft preservation, as well as the role of ATP and adenosine as driving factors in the promotion and suppression of posttransplant inflammation and allograft rejection, are discussed. We also examine novel therapeutic approaches that take advantage of the ischemia‐reperfusion‐responsive and immunomodulatory roles for purinergic signaling with the goal of enhancing graft viability, attenuating posttransplant inflammation, and minimizing complications including rejection, graft failure, and associated comorbidities.     

A gut microbiota score predicting acute graft‐versus‐host disease following myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Although studies have reported that intestinal microbiota are associated with acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD), they lacked a satisfactory method for predicting aGVHD. We collected stool and blood samples at day 15 posttransplant from 150 patients from two centers who underwent myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Stool microbiota were detected by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing; inflammatory factors and T lymphocytes were detected by multiplex immunoassays and flow cytometry, respectively. A gut microbiota score (GMS) from a LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) model was developed and validated to predict aGVHD. In the discovery cohort, the GMS could predict II‐IV aGVHD (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve [AUC] = 0.904, P < .0001). Furthermore, the validation model was consistent with the discovery set (AUC = 0.887, P < .0001). Regulatory T/T‐helper 17 (Treg/Th17) cells ratio in the low GMS subgroup was higher compared with the high GMS (P = .012), and the validation set is consistent with the discovery set (P = .003). In addition, high cytokine levels were associated with high GMS. In conclusion, the GMS at neutrophil engraftment could predict aGVHD, and it was a potential and novel method. The GMS was associated with the inflammatory factor and Treg/Th17 balance.     

A prospective,iterative, adaptive trial of carfilzomib‐based desensitization

Proteasome inhibitor–based strategies hold promise in transplant but have yielded varying results. Carfilzomib, a second‐generation proteasome inhibitor, may possess advantages over bortezomib, the first‐generation proteasome inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of carfilzomib in highly HLA‐sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Renal transplant candidates received escalating doses of carfilzomib followed by plasmapheresis (group A) or an identical regimen with additional plasmapheresis once weekly before carfilzomib dosing. Thirteen participants received carfilzomib, which was well tolerated with most adverse events classified as low grade. The safety profile was similar to bortezomib desensitization; however, neurotoxicity was not observed with carfilzomib. Toxicity resulted in permanent dose reduction in 1 participant but caused no withdrawals or deaths. HLA antibodies were substantially reduced with carfilzomib alone, and median maximal immunodominant antibody reduction was 72.8% (69.8% for group A, P = .031, 80.1% for group B, P = .938). After depletion, rebound occurred rapidly and antibody levels returned to baseline between days 81 and 141. Bone marrow studies revealed that approximately 69.2% of plasma cells were depleted after carfilzomib monotherapy. Carfilzomib monotherapy–based desensitization provides an acceptable safety and toxicity profile while leading to significant bone marrow plasma cell depletion and anti‐HLA antibody reduction.     

Trained immunity in organ transplantation

Consistent induction of donor‐specific unresponsiveness in the absence of continuous immunosuppressive therapy and toxic effects remains a difficult task in clinical organ transplantation. Transplant immunologists have developed numerous experimental treatments that target antigen‐presentation (signal 1), costimulation (signal 2), and cytokine production (signal 3) to establish transplantation tolerance. While promising results have been obtained using therapeutic approaches that predominantly target the adaptive immune response, the long‐term graft survival rates remain suboptimal. This suggests the existence of unrecognized allograft rejection mechanisms that contribute to organ failure. We postulate that trained immunity stimulatory pathways are critical to the immune response that mediates graft loss. Trained immunity is a recently discovered functional program of the innate immune system, which is characterized by nonpermanent epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Since trained macrophages upregulate costimulatory molecules (signal 2) and produce pro‐inflammatory cytokines (signal 3), they contribute to potent graft reactive immune responses and organ transplant rejection. In this review, we summarize the detrimental effects of trained immunity in the context of organ transplantation and describe pathways that induce macrophage training associated with graft rejection.     

Pancreatic islets engineered with a FasL protein induce systemic tolerance at the induction phase that evolves into long‐term graft‐localized immune privilege

We have previously shown that pancreatic islets engineered to transiently display a modified form of FasL protein (SA‐FasL) on their surface survive indefinitely in allogeneic recipients without a need for chronic immunosuppression. Mechanisms that confer long‐term protection to allograft are yet to be elucidated. We herein demonstrated that immune protection evolves in two distinct phases; induction and maintenance. SA‐FasL‐engineered allogeneic islets survived indefinitely and conferred protection to a second set of donor‐matched, but not third‐party, unmanipulated islet grafts simultaneously transplanted under the contralateral kidney capsule. Protection at the induction phase involved a reduction in the frequency of proliferating alloreactive T cells in the graft‐draining lymph nodes, and required phagocytes and TGF‐β. At the maintenance phase, immune protection evolved into graft site‐restricted immune privilege as the destruction of long‐surviving SA‐FasL‐islet grafts by streptozotocin followed by the transplantation of a second set of unmanipulated islet grafts into the same site from the donor, but not third party, resulted in indefinite survival. The induced immune privilege required both CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells and persistent presence of donor antigens. Engineering cell and tissue surfaces with SA‐FasL protein provides a practical, efficient, and safe means of localized immunomodulation with important implications for autoimmunity and transplantation.