The pharmacological advantage of prolonged dose rate gemcitabine is restricted to patients with variant alleles of cytidine deaminase c.79A>C

Aim: Controversy exists over the optimal dosing for the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine. A pharmacological advantage is achieved by prolonging infusion times but evidence for a clinical benefit has been conflicting. We hypothesized that polymorphisms in genes involved in gemcitabine accumulation, particularly the cytidine deaminase CDA c.79A>C, may influence the optimal dosing regimen in individual patients. Methods: DNA was collected from 32 patients participating in a randomized crossover study comparing 30‐min with 100‐min infusions of gemcitabine. The relationships between seven polymorphisms among three genes (CDA, RRM1 and DCK) and (i) gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation; (ii) gemcitabine‐induced toxicity; and (iii) dose delivery were examined for each infusion time and week of administration. Results: There were trends for increased accumulation of gemcitabine‐triphosphate (GEM‐TP) with the variant alleles of CDA c.79A>C, and RRM1‐37C>A and ‐524T>C but none of these reached statistical significance in a univariate analysis. In a multivariable model there were significant effects of infusion duration and week of administration on GEM‐TP accumulation. There were significant interactions between CDA c.79A>C (P = 0.01) and RRM1‐37C>A (P = 0.019) genotypes, infusion time, and arm. More patients with one or two CDA c.79 variant alleles had doses delays (57 vs 13 %, P = 0.03) and a pharmacological advantage for prolonged infusion after week 1. Conclusion: It is important to consider both pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in optimizing gemcitabine accumulation. This represents a classical interaction between genes and environment and provides support for the consideration of both CDA genotype and infusion duration in development of an individualized dosing strategy.     

Pharmacogenetic characterization of indacaterol,a novel β2-adrenoceptor agonist

Background and purpose:

Indacaterol is a novel β₂-adrenoceptor agonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative pharmacology of indacaterol in recombinant cells expressing the common polymorphic variants of the human β₂-adrenoceptor and in human primary airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells.

Experimental approach:

Chinese hamster ovarian-K1 cell lines expressing high and low levels of the common human β₂-adrenoceptor variants were generated [Gly16-Glu27-Val34-Thr164(GEVT), RQVT, GQVT] and also the rare GQVI variant. Human primary ASM cells were isolated from explants of trachealis muscle. Adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic-monophosphate production was used as an outcome measure.

Key results:

In both the low- and high-expression recombinant GEVT ‘wild type’ cell lines indacaterol is a high-efficacy agonist. Salmeterol and formoterol were identified as low- and high-efficacy agonists, respectively, and showed similar potencies to indacaterol irrespective of the β₂-adrenoceptor genotype. The I164 variant cell line was associated with a reduced capacity to generate adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic-monophosphate in response to β₂-adrenoceptor agonist. In the human primary ASM cells indacaterol gave a maximal response intermediate between that of salmeterol and formoterol.

Conclusions and implications:

These data demonstrate that indacaterol is a high-efficacy agonist in recombinant cell systems but acts with lower efficacy in human primary ASM cells. No marked genotype-dependent effects were observed for common variants; however, changes in I164 receptor activity were identified, which were dependent on the level of expression of β₂-adrenoceptors.     

No significant effect of ABCB1 haplotypes on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate possible effects of ABCB1 genotype on fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

In a fixed-order crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers with the ABCB1 c.1236C/C-c.2677G/G-c.3435C/C (CGC/CGC) genotype and 10 with the c.1236T/T-c.2677T/T-c.3435T/T (TTT/TTT) genotype ingested a single 20-mg dose of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin. Plasma fluvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin concentrations were measured up to 12 h and plasma and urine rosuvastatin concentrations up to 48 and 24 h, respectively.

RESULTS

The ABCB1 genotype had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of any of the investigated statins. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC_0–∞) in participants with the TTT/TTT genotype to that in those with the CGC/CGC genotype was 0.96 (0.77, 1.20; P= 0.737) for fluvastatin, 0.92 (0.53, 1.62; P= 0.772) for pravastatin, 0.83 (0.36, 1.90; P= 0.644) for lovastatin, 1.25 (0.72, 2.17; P= 0.400) for lovastatin acid, and 1.10 (0.73, 1.65; P= 0.626) for rosuvastatin. The AUC_0–∞ of lovastatin acid correlated significantly with that of rosuvastatin (r= 0.570, P= 0.009), but none of the other AUC_0–∞ pairs showed a significant correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the ABCB1 c.1236C-c.2677G-c.3435C and c.1236T-c.2677T-c.3435T haplotypes play no significant role in the interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin.     

Pharmacogenetics of beta-blockers

Beta-blockers are an important cardiovascular drug class, recommended as first-line treatment of numerous diseases such as heart failure, hypertension, and angina, as well as treatment after myocardial infarction. However, responses to a beta-blocker are variable among patients. Results of numerous studies now suggest that genetic polymorphisms may contribute to variability in responses to beta-blockers. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic data for beta-blockers in patients with various diseases and discusses the potential implications of beta-blocker pharmacogenetics in clinical practice.     

Effect of ABCB1 (MDR1) haplotypes derived from G2677T/C3435T on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy subjects

AIM: We aimed to investigate the effect of the ABCB1 gene on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine. METHODS: Based on polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene at positions 2677 and 3435, 26 healthy male participants were divided into three groups: subjects with 2677GG/3435CC (n = 9), 2677GT/3435CT (n = 9) and 2677TT/3435TT (n = 8). After a single-dose administration of 5 mg amlodipine, plasma concentrations of amlodipine were measured and its pharmacokinetic characteristics were compared according to ABCB1 genotype. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve was significantly lower in subjects with 2677TT/3435TT (140.8 +/- 35.6 ng h(-1) ml(-1)) and 2677GT/3435CT (149.8 +/- 40.1 ng h(-1) ml(-1)) than in those with 2677GG/3435CC (208.6 +/- 39.2 ng h(-1) ml(-1)) [95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference, 2677GG/3435CC vs. 2677GT/3435CT 12.0, 105.6, P < 0.01; 2677GG/3435CC vs. 2677TT/3435TT 19.6, 116.0, P < 0.01; 2677GT/3435CT vs. 2677TT/3435TT - 39.2, 57.2, P > 0.05]. The peak plasma concentrations were highest in subjects with 2677GG/3435CC (3.8 +/- 0.5 ng ml(-1)), lower in subjects with 2677GT/3435CT (3.2 +/- 0.5 ng ml(-1)) and 2677TT/3435TT (2.7 +/- 0.5 ng ml(-1)) in rank and showed a significant difference between those with 2677GG/3435CC and with 2677TT/3435TT (95% CI on the difference 0.4, 2.0, P < 0.01). However, the oral clearance was higher in subjects with 2677TT/3435TT (37.7 +/- 10.2 l h(-1)) than in those with 2677GT/3435CT (35.7 +/- 9.9 l h(-1)) and with 2677GG/3435CC (24.8 +/- 5.4 l h(-1)) and exhibited a significant difference between ABCB1 genotype groups (95% CI on the difference, 2677GG/3435CC vs. 2677GT/3435CT - 21.5, - 0.3, P < 0.05; 2677GG/3435CC vs. 2677TT/3435TT - 23.8, - 2.0, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Amlodipine pharmacokinetics was affected by the genetic polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene in humans. These findings may provide a plausible explanation for interindividual variation in the disposition of amlodipine, although our study could not explain the exact mechanism(s) by which the polymorphic ABCB1 gene paradoxically reduces the plasma levels of amlodipine. Further evaluation is thus warranted.     

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and the IVS14+1G>A mutation in patients developing 5FU-related toxicity

AIMS: To examine retrospectively the relationship between DPD phenotype/genotype and the intensity of 5FU toxicity. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one case-reports (81 women, 50 men) with 5FU-related toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: The lower the DPD activity (10-504 pmol min(-1) mg(-1)), the higher the toxicity grade was scored (P < 0.01). Toxicity-related deaths occurred in nine patients (eight women) who significantly expressed lower DPD activity than other patients. Two of the deceased patients had normal DPD activity. The IVS14+1G>A mutation, analyzed in 93 patients, was detected in two patients (nonlethal toxicity). CONCLUSIONS: The IVS14+1G>A mutation may not help prevent toxicity and patients with normal DPD activity may develop life-threatening 5FU toxicity.