微泵输注5-FU联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗晚期胃肠道肿瘤疗效观察

目的观察5-FU持续输注联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗晚期胃肠道肿瘤客观疗效及毒副作用。方法深静脉留置导管,CF 200mg/m2输注后5-FU 3.5g/m2置入微泵持续输注48小时,同时用DDP 60mg/m2行腹腔化疗。结果52例病人,CR 6例,PR 22例,SD 21例,PD 3例,总有效率53.9%。其中胃癌32例,CR 5例,PR 15例,有效率62.5%;肠癌20例,CR 1例,PR 7例,有效率40.0%。主要毒副反应为恶心呕吐、骨髓抑制,大多为I~II级。结论5-FU持续输注联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗晚期胃肠道肿瘤近期疗效较好,可减轻临床症状,毒副反应较轻。     

Prevention of hemorrhage by elastic suture material used for securing intravenous catheters within major branches of the portal vein

Portal venous infusion of chemotherapy may prove to be an important treatment effective in diminishing the incidence of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. To infuse drugs safely and reliably, we have cannulated major branches of the portal vein exposed during right or left colectomy. To prevent bleeding into the free peritoneal cavity upon catheter removal, the cannula is secured with elastic suture material. The technique has been used in 30 patients without complication.     

Continuous hepatic artery infusion of 5-fluorouracil for metastatic colorectal cancer localised to the liver

Continuous regional delivery of chemotherapeutic agents offers the prospect of maximising dose intensity at the site of localised disease, while minimising systemic toxicity. This prospective phase II study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of hepatic arterial infusion of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) via an implantable Infusaid? pump in previously untreated patients with localised but unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. In 25 patients the response rate was 56% and median survival was 15 months, comparable to previous reports utilising fluorodeoxy-uridine (FUDR). Twenty per cent of patients (all responders) survived longer than three years. Systemic toxicity was trivial, and the practice of reducing the intensity of therapy when nausea or a rise in alkaline phosphatase occurred avoided the previously described local toxicity of biliary sclerosis seen frequently with FUDR. In selected patients, particularly those with more limited disease, this form of therapy is effective and well tolerated and warrants further evaluation as an alternative to FUDR. (Aust NZ J Med 1993; 23: 32–34.)     

Capecitabine or infusional 5-fluorouracil for gastroesophageal cancer: a cost-consequence analysis

Background

In patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer, the phase iii Randomized ECF for Advanced and Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer 2 (real-2) trial demonstrated equivalent clinical efficacy when capecitabine (x) was substituted for 5-fluorouracil (5fu) in the epirubicin–cisplatin–5fu (ecf) regimen. The present analysis compares the direct medical costs associated with both regimens.

Methods

This cost–consequence analysis of direct medical costs took resource utilization data from the real-2 trial where available. Direct medical costs were derived from the perspective of the Canadian public health care system in 2008 Canadian dollars. Mean cost per patient on each treatment arm was calculated.

Results

Drug costs from start of treatment until first progression, including pre- and post-chemotherapy medications and administration costs, totalled $5,344 for ecx as compared with $3,187 for ecf. Costs for treatment of adverse events were estimated at $2,621 for ecx as compared with $3,397 for ecf. An additional cost of $873 was associated with insertion of an implanted venous access. Total incremental cost of ecx over ecf was $508.

Conclusions

In advanced gastroesophageal cancer, capecitabine is an attractive alternative to 5fu. Although the drug cost per se is greater, use of capecitabine is associated with decreased consumption of hospital resources. Not only does capecitabine fit with patient preference for oral therapy, it also avoids the inconvenience and complications of central venous access.     

Regional and systemic chemotherapy for primary hepatobiliary cancers and for colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver

Hepatic arterial infusional (HAI) chemotherapy is based on the premise that primary and metastatic tumors derive their blood supply from the hepatic artery, whereas normal liver derives its blood supply from the portal vein. This approach has been extensively studied in liver-only colorectal metastasis patients, with 10 published prospective randomized clinical trials comparing fluoropyrimidine-based HAI therapy with systemic chemotherapy. Most of these studies showed a statistically significant superior response rate and improved disease-free survival with HAI chemotherapy compared with systemic fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy alone. More advanced chemotherapeutic regimens including biologically targeted agents have clearly impacted survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and are currently under investigation with HAI-based trials. In contrast, hepatobiliary tumors remain difficult to treat with overall poor response and survival with systemic chemotherapy. Few clinical trials have attempted to address the role of HAI-based therapy for these regional tumors, although encouraging response rates up to 60% have been reported. Therefore, the regional approach for hepatobiliary tumors deserves further investigation as well as randomized trials for adequate comparison to new systemic chemotherapies.     

Outcome of intrathecal opioids in chronic non-cancer pain

Eighty-eight patients (58 women and 30 men; mean age 53.4 years) with chronic non-cancer pain present on average for 9.8 years were evaluated following treatment with intrathecal opioids for an average duration of 36.2 months. Outcome measures were global pain relief, physical activity levels, medication consumption, work status, intrathecal opioid side-effects, proportion of patients who ceased therapy and patient satisfaction. The most common diagnosis in this group was lumbar spinal or radicular pain after failed spinal surgery (n= 55, 63%). At the time of follow-up, mean pain relief was 60% with 74% of patients (36 of 49) reporting increased activity levels. Oral medication intake was significantly reduced (Medication Quantification Scale Score prior to implantation 31.0+/-2.6 and at follow-up 12.7+/-1.4; n= 48; p< 0.0001). These gains were not accompanied by a change in work status (43 of 50 working age patients not working at follow-up). There were frequent reports of opioid side-effects, including sexual dysfunction and menstrual disturbance. Technical complications occurred with the drug administration device, most often catheter related, requiring at least one further surgical procedure in 32 patients (40%). Patient satisfaction with intrathecal opioids was high, with 45 of 51 (88%) reporting satisfaction. Mean intrathecal morphine dose increased from 9.95+/-1.49 mg/day (mean+/-SEM) at 6 months to 15.26+/-2.52 mg/day 36 months after initiation of therapy. Drug administration systems were permanently removed in five patients (6%). Intrathecal opioid therapy appears to have a place in the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Therapy does not seem to be significantly inhibited by the development of tolerance.     

Early on-treatment predictions of clinical outcomes using alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin responses in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: The clinical utility of alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) and des‐γ‐carboxy prothrombin (DCP) as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving hepatic artery infusional chemotherapy (HAIC) or concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) has been poorly defined. Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2007, we enrolled 127 treatment‐naïve patients who received HAIC (n = 60) or CCRT (n = 67) as an initial treatment modality. An AFP or DCP response was defined as a reduction of more than 20% from the baseline level. Results: AFP responders showed significantly better overall survival (OS) than non‐responders among patients with HAIC (median 17.3 vs 6.4 months, P < 0.001) and with CCRT (median 17.6 vs 8.7 months, P = 0.014). DCP responders in the CCRT group also showed significantly better progression‐free survival (PFS) than non‐responders (median 9.2 vs 3.1 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that AFP response was independently predictive of OS in both groups (P = 0.009 in HAIC and P = 0.008 in CCRT) whereas DCP only predicted PFS in patients with CCRT (P = 0.015). Conclusions: Early on‐treatment AFP response was predictive of OS in treatment‐naïve patients with advanced HCC receiving HAIC and CCRT as an initial treatment modality. Furthermore, DCP response was useful for predicting PFS in patients with CCRT.     

Phase II study of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ETF) in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. A Yorkshire breast cancer research group study

This study was originally designed as a phase I/II study, with a dose escalation of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg m(-2) day(-1). However, as dose escalation was not possible, the study is reported as a phase II study of the combination to assess response and toxicity. A total of 51 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were treated on this phase II study, with doses of docetaxel 50 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and infusional 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 21 days. The main toxicity of this combination was neutropenia with 89% of patients having grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, and 39% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Nonhaematological toxicity was mild. The overall response rate in the assessable patients was 64%, with median progression-free survival of 38 weeks, and median survival of 70 weeks. The ETF regimen was found to be toxic, and it was not possible to escalate the dose of docetaxel above the first dose level. This regimen has therefore not been taken any further, but as a development of this a new study is ongoing, combining 3-weekly epirubicin, weekly docetaxel and capecitabine, days 1-14.     

Infusional 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin C in advanced gastric cancer: a low cost effective regimen

Recently, we reported a highly active regimen in advanced gastric cancer including a weekly administration of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil with the support of filgrastim. In order to simplify the administration and to decrease the toxicity of these drugs, mainly epidoxorubicin-induced alopecia, we designed a regimen including an infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule according to the de Gramont regimen, cisplatin and mitomycin C replacing epidoxorubicin. Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 2 weeks, 6S-stereoisomer-leucovorin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) i.v. in a 22-h infusion, on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, and mitomycin C 7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 6 weeks. Grades 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) consisted mainly of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a complete response and 16 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-61.2%). The median survival was 11 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin according to de Gramont, and mitomycin C seems to be an active and safe regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Because of its low cost it may be suggested for patients not enrolled into clinical trials.     

The symptomatic benefit (the clinical benefit response) from the second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

There are few reports on use of symptomatic benefits as an alternative or adjunctive for the assessment of objective response in chemotherapy of the advanced cancer. This study is performed to assess the symptomatic benefits (the clinical benefit response), in addition to the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination as second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Fifty-eight advanced gastric cancer patients with previous chemotherapy were enrolled into the study. Cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) was given for 5 days, and 5-FU was given 1000 mg/m(2) as 20 h continuous infusion for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. The overall objective response rate was 11.3%, and overall tumour control rate was 33.9%. The clinical benefit response, in terms of weight gain, reduction in analgesic consumption and the improvement in performance status observed in 12 patients [six patients with partial response (PR) and six patients with stable disease (SD)] (22.6%), while the rates of the clinical benefit response in patients with PR and with SD were 100% and 50% respectively. Cisplatin plus infusional 5-FU combination seems to improve disease-related symptoms (clinical benefit response) of patients with advanced gastric cancer, even in patients without objective response.