Comorbid Profile Rather than Age Determines Hip Fracture Mortality in a Nonagenarian Population

Background

In light of poor outcomes with nonoperative management of hip fractures, orthopedic surgeons are faced with difficult decisions about which patients are too ill or too old for surgical treatment.

Questions/Purposes

This study sought to investigate if patients over 90 years had different preoperative laboratory, clinical, and injury characteristics than younger patients with the same injury. We compared our cohort with previously published data. We wished to identify if there were pre-injury risk factors associated with 30-day mortality, which could be modified to enhance postoperative outcomes.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 198 operatively managed hip fractures in patients 75 years or older. We collected data on demographics, select preoperative laboratory values, injury type, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality.

Results

Eleven (5.6%) of the cohort died within 30 days of surgery, 6.3% in the younger group, and 3.7% in the older group; the difference was not statistically significant. For baseline characteristics, there was no difference between the age groups for pre-injury comorbidities, hemoglobin, serum albumin, BUN, prevalence of UTI, or fracture type. A total of 67 (35.8%) patients had evidence of UTI on admission.

Conclusions

These findings reveal that in our dichotomized cohort, pre-injury characteristics were similar and age alone was not an independent predictor of mortality. These data may inform decision-making for orthopedic surgeons and the medical providers who consult to optimize these patients for surgery. We identified high rates of UTI in both age groups, a potentially remediable factor to optimize outcomes in hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-015-9435-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Teaching Geriatrics Using an Innovative,Individual‐Centered Educational Game: Students and Educators Win. A Proof‐of‐Concept Study

Given the increasingly aging population, nearly every doctor will encounter elderly adults who present with multiple complex comorbidities that can challenge even experienced physicians. This may explain why many medical students do not have a positive attitude toward elderly adults and find the complexity of their problems overwhelming. It was hypothesized that a recently developed medical school geriatrics course, based on the game GeriatriX and designed specifically to address the complexities associated with decision‐making in geriatrics, can have a positive effect on attitudes toward geriatrics and on perceived knowledge of geriatrics. The effects of this game‐based course were evaluated as a proof of concept. The assessment was based on the Aging Semantic Differential (ASD) and a validated self‐perceived knowledge scale of geriatric topics. The usability of (and satisfaction with) GeriatriX was also assessed using a 5‐point Likert scale. After completion of the course, the ASD changed significantly in the geriatrics course group (n = 29; P = .02) but not in a control group that took a neuroscience course (n = 24; P = .30). Moreover, the geriatrics course group had a significant increase in self‐perceived knowledge for 12 of the 18 topics (P = .002), whereas in the control group self‐perceived knowledge increased significantly for one topic only (sensory impairment) (P = .04). Finally, the geriatrics students reported enjoying GeriatriX. This proof‐of‐concept study clearly supports the hypothesis that a 4‐week course using a modern educational approach such as GeriatriX can improve students' self‐perceived knowledge of geriatrics and their attitudes toward elderly adults.     

American Geriatrics Society Identifies Another Five Things That Healthcare Providers and Patients Should Question

Since 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) has also been collaborating with the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation, joining its “Choosing Wisely” campaign on two separate lists of Five Things Healthcare Providers and Patients Should Question. The campaign is designed to engage healthcare organizations and professionals, individuals, and family caregivers in discussions about the safety and appropriateness of medical tests, medications, and procedures. Participating healthcare providers are asked to identify five things—tests, medications, or procedures—that appear to harm rather than help. Providers then share this information in a published article about these things on the ABIM campaign's website ( www.choosingwisely.org ). The first AGS list was published in February 2013.