VDD Single Pass Lead Pacing; Sustained Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardias Unrelated to Retrograde Atrial Activation

Pacemaker mediated tachycardias (PMTs) are a well known complication of P synchronous pacing. Although the initiating mechanisms are severel, all of them are associated with retrograde atrial activation, which is sensed by the atrial sensing channel, resulting in ventricular pacing. In 19 patients suffering from symptomatic AV conduction disturbances and normal sinus node function, a VDD pacing system connected to a single pass ventricular lead with dual chamber electrodes was implanted. The bipolar atrial electrode, floating in the right atrium, was used to detect endocardial atrial electrograms that were differentially processed within the pacemaker for optimal discrimination and filtering of undesirable signals. The widely programmable atrial sensitivity (amplitude and filtering) allowed stable P synchronized ventricular pacing in all patients, but in five of them, sustained PMTs not related to retrograde atrial activation was documented during the follow-up. The common mechanism for the onset and maintenance of these PMTs was traced to the abnormal sensing of the terminal forces of ventricular activation and for of the T wave. The possibility of interferences between ventricular and atrial electrodes (crosstalk) was also considered, The reduction of atrial channel sensitivity represented in all cases the only effective procedure to prevent this type of PMT. In conclusion, the best signal to noise ratio is an important endpoint (o assure the proper function of a single lead VDD pacing system. Furthermore, using the differential amplifier built within the pacemaker, consideration should be given to the optimal mode of rejection of the terminal forces of the QRS and T wave.     

Recurrent atrial electrode displacement complicating a single lead VDD pacing system

We describe an unusual complication of single-lead VDD pacing: recurrent advancement of the atrial bipole into the right ventricle. As a consequence, the patient experienced symptomatic pacemaker-mediated tachycardia and underwent two revision operations to achieve adequate fixation of the lead.     

Long-term efficacy and stability of atrial sensing in VDD pacing

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and stability of atrial electrode sensing function is essential in maintaining atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and activity response in VDD pacing. Studies to evaluate the relationship between atrial sensing efficacy, stability, and implantation strategy are few. HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to determine the possible predictors, among the recipients' underlying clinical conditions and the implantation strategies used, of achieving the most stable and effective atrial sensing. METHODS: Eighty consecutive adults implanted with VDD pacemakers were studied retrospectively. Atrial electrodes were positioned where the optimal atrial potentials (APs) were measured during implantation. Interrogation parameters, including AV-synchrony ratio, were acquired immediately post implantation, at 1 year, and at 2 years after pacemaker implantation. Appropriate atrial sensing efficacy was defined as AV-synchrony ratio > or = 90%. The stability of atrial sensing was evaluated by the variation ranges of measured APs. RESULTS: The measured APs showed no statistical difference when age, gender, or comorbidity was considered. However, with pacing-lead bending angles < or = 90 degrees, patients may have presented with larger APs and narrower AP variation than patients with obtuse angles. There were no clinical parameters in our study that could have predicted the proper atrial sensing efficacy with an AV-synchrony ratio > or = 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term sensing efficacy and stability of VDD pacing is reliable. More sophisticated implantation strategies may further improve the atrial sensing stability and efficacy in VDD pacing.     

Efficacy of single lead VDD pacing in patients with impaired and normal left ventricular function

Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing seems to be the best pacing mode for patients with advanced AV block and impaired LV function. The long-term follow-up of single lead VDD pacing was studied in 33 patients with impaired LV function and compared to 42 patients with normal LV function. All patients received the same VDD lead and VDDR pacemaker. The lead model with 13-cm AV spacing between the atrial and ventricular electrode was implanted in 89% of the patients. Follow-ups were 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage of atrial sensing and the P wave amplitude were determined at each follow-up. Minimal P wave amplitude at implantation was 2.0 +/- 1.4 mV in patients with impaired and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mV with normal LV function (not significant). At the 12-month follow-up, 33 patients with normal and 23 patients with depressed LV function remained paced in the VDD mode. The remaining patients died in five (impaired LV function) and seven cases (normal LV function) or their pacemakers were programmed to the VVI/VVIR pacing mode in four (impaired LV function) and three cases (normal LV function). P wave amplitude did not differ in the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 1.17 +/- 0.42 mV; normal: 1.09 +/- 0.49 mV). The atrial sensitivity was programmed in most patients to sensitive settings with no differences between the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 0.13 +/- 0.06 mV; normal: 0.13 +/- 0.05 mV). The diagnostic counters indicated nearly permanent atrial sensing (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 99.3 +/- 2.2%; normal: 99.0 +/- 1.0 mV). In conclusions, single lead VDD pacing restored AV synchronous ventricular pacing in patients with normal and with impaired LV function indicating that it could be an alternative to DDD pacemakers, but not to dual-chamber pacing.     

Three-year follow-up of atrial sensing efficacy in children and adults with a single lead VDD pacing system

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of atrial sensing in children with a single pass lead VDD pacing system and to compare it with the efficacy of atrial sensing in adult patients with the same pacing system. Although the feasibility of single pass lead VDD pacing system implantation in children was recently demonstrated, the efficacy of atrial sensing remains unclear. In addition, the effect of accelerated growth of children on the systems' efficacy has not been addressed. Atrial sensing followed by ventricular sensing and atrial sensing followed by ventricular pacing was prospectively evaluated in 13 children (age 0.5-15 years) and 24 adult patients (age 19-74 years). All had the same endocardial pacing system using a single pass lead. The children and adults had effective atrial sensing at a success rate of 94.00 +/- 9.687% and 96.04 +/- 4.64%, respectively, during mean follow-up of 3.5 years. The atrial electrogram amplitude was similar in both groups, 1.8 +/- 1.5 mV in children and 1.8 +/- 1.1 mV in adults. The adult patients more frequently exhibited ventricular sensing following atrial sensing. The ventricular pacing threshold and impedance were stable in both groups. When necessary, in children, the atrial sensing was corrected by adjusting the pacemaker's lower rate programming. Highly effective atrial sensing was demonstrated in children and adult patients with a single pass lead VDD pacing system. During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, not only was the atrial electrogram amplitude stable, but the clinically relevant atrial sensing was highly effective, justifying endocardial pacing with single pass lead VDD pacing in children and adults with preserved sinus node function.     

Occurrence and Significance of Arrhythmias Associated with Atrial-Triggered Ventricular Pacing

A review of electrocardiograms from 85 patients with atrial-triggered ventricular pacing (VAT, VDD, DDD) showed that various disturbances of rhythm were relatively common, and that the effects of an arrhythmia could be aggravated by this type of pacing. In certain circumstances even potentially dangerous ventricular extrasystoles were induced by the pacemaker. Abnormal triggering, sometimes with regular sinus rhythm, could also induce tachycardia. Our observations provided indications for a pacemaker design that would avoid such disturbing effects. The best available pacer for atrial-triggered ventricular pacing is the programmable DDD type.     

Reliability of single-lead VDD atrial sensing and pacing during exercise

If atrial sensing ability of a single-lead VDD pacemaker is well accepted at rest, the detection quality by atrial floating electrodes remains less recognized during exercise. The aim of this study was to verify, during treadmill test and a continous telemetry, the atrial tracking performance using four different leads technologies. From November 1994 to July 1997, 21 patients (71.3 +/- 6.3 years old, 7 female, cardiopathy: 57%) were paced for isolated high degree (permanent: 13, paroxystic: 8) AV block. The implanted devices were the Vitatron Saphir/Brillant lead (13 patients), Intermedics Unity/425/04-13 lead (5 patients), Pacesetter Addvent (2 patients), and Biotronik Eikos (1 patient). The acute atrial signal amplitude was 1.66 +/- 0.75 mV. The treadmill test used the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol after pacemaker reprogramming to detect atrial undersensing (AV delay < or = 120 ms, no hysteresis, no flywheel, upper rate increase). The mean delay was 31.1 weeks (range 1-100). The testing duration was 6.1 +/- 2.3 minutes, the number of steps was 3.3 +/- 1.3 per patient, and the peak exercise rate was 135 +/- 19 beats/min. At rest, complete atrial tracking was complete in 90% of the patients, and during testing in only 23.8% of the patients, while AV synchronization > 95% was present in 57.1%, > 90% in 71.4%, and > 85% in 90.4% of patients (Vitatron 13/13, Intermedics 3/5, Biotronik 1/1, and Pacesetter 1/2). During the recovery period synchronization was always > 95%. The mean P wave amplitude at rest was 1.1 +/- 0.5 mV; during the first step, 1.04 +/- 0.61 mV; second step, 0.94 +/- 0.53 mV; third step, 0.82 +/- 0.58 mV; fourth step, 0.67 +/- 0.39 mV; and during recovery, 1.13 +/- 0.67 mV. The mean P wave decrease signal at peak of exercise is 0.21 mV (from -1.31 to +0.5). In fact, P wave variations have several patterns: a decrease was measured in 7 patients, an increase in 2 patients, and no significant change in 7 patients. Single-lead VDD P wave identification during exercise was almost accurate. However, often there was progressive lowering of atrial sensing with transient loss of AV synchrony.     

Single Pass VDD Pacing in Children and Adolescents

Use of a single pass lead for VDD pacing in complete heart block is well described in adults, but there are only brief reports of its use in children. We have used standard adult size single pass leads in 13 children and adolescents aged 3.7–17.2 years (mean 10.1 years) and weighing 13.5–76 kg (mean 34.8 kg). Congenital complete heart block was present in 7 patients, surgical complete heart block in 5 patients and 2:1 AV block of unknown cause in 1 patient. In four patients, the VDD system was their first pacing system. In nine of the patients, 1–6 previous systems had been used and simultaneous extraction of ventricular leads and/or atrial leads was performed. Leads of four different types were used: Brilliant IMPl5Q, Brilliant + IMR15Q, CapSure 5032, and Unipass 425–13 with 4 different generators: Saphir 600, SaphirII620, Thera VDD 8948, and Unity 292–07. At implantation, via a subclavian vein puncture, excess lead was advanced into the right atrium to allow both atrial sensing and slack for further growth. Ventricular thresholds ranged from 0.2–0.7 V. The minimal atrial amplitude was 0.7–4 mV and the maximum amplitude was 2.5–8 mV. There were no complications. Ail patients have maintained adequate atrial signals for reliable pacing with follow up of 3–36 months (mean 17.6 months) during which time some have undergone considerable growth. Beliable atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is possible in growing children with complete heart block using a standard adult single pass lead.     

Long-Term Reliability of Single Lead Atrial Synchronous Pacing Systems Using Closely Spaced Atrial Dipoles: Five-Year Experience

To assess the long-term capability of single atrioven ticular (AV) lead VDD pacing systems using close atrial dipoles to assure reliable atrial guided pacing, the safety and efficacy of 86 VDD units implanted in 73 patients at a single center since November 1988 was reviewed. All patients suffered from advanced AV block with normal sinoatrial function. Sixty five patients received a LEM/CCS Twinal 30/30S system, four patients received a Vitatron-Saphir system, and four patients received a Medtronic Thera VDR 8348 system. All patients underwent provocative tests in search of myopotential interference, and Holter recordings; in a group of patients who underwent pacemaker replacement a comparison was made between implant and replacement measurements. The mean follow-up duration was 27.3 months. A high percentage of successfully VDD paced patients and a low incidence of pacemaker malfunction, regularly solved by pacemaker reprogramming, was reported. Atrial signal amplitudes comparable to those measured at implant were found at replacement in all patients. These data support the long-term reliability of single AV lead VDD pacing systems with closely spaced atrial dipoles, as well as stable atrial sensing by floating bipolar atrial electrodes and effective atrial synchronous ventricular pacing over time.     

Complications of Single Lead VDD Pacing in 35 Patients with AV Block

The implantation of a VDD system is comparable to that of a VVI system, but its management is associated with typical complications of dual chamber pacing. In 35 patients with symptomatic AV block and normal sinus node function, two different VDD pacing systems were implanted. Most of the complications described and their mode of resolution were common to VDD and DDD pacing; however, the VDD system eliminated the need for two separate leads. We, therefore, favor single lead VDD pacing in the treatment of complete AV block with normal sinus node function.