Expression of BAG-1 and BcL-2 Proteins Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

It has been suggested that expression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 or BAG-1 may confer cellular resistance to chemotherapy. A corollary of this hypothesis is that expression of these proteins may predict clinical response to treatment and that Bcl-2- or BAG-1-positive cells may selectively be enriched in postchemotherapy tissue specimens. The goal of this exploratory pilot study was to assess these two predictions by using immunohistochemistry in 29 paired pre- and postchemotherapy breast tissue specimens obtained from patients who underwent preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. All breast cancers expressed BAG-1 protein, and, in individual tumors, 40-100% of neoplastic cells stained positive for this protein. Homogenous cytoplasmic staining was typically observed, though neoplastic cells also showed nuclear staining in many specimens. We found no correlation between prechemotherapy expression of BAG-1 and subsequent pathological response to cytotoxic therapy. Paired pre- and posttreatment specimens showed similar levels of BAG-1 expression when residual tumor could be assessed. Bcl-2 was expressed in 55% of cancers and was localized to the cytoplasm. Absence of Bcl-2 expression in prechemotherapy specimens was associated with more frequent complete pathological response (58% vs. 20%; p = 0.04). However, similar to BAG-1, no difference between pre- and posttherapy expression of Bcl-2 was observed in neoplastic cells in paired tissue specimens. These observations suggest that BAG-1 contributes an important cellular function to breast epithelial cells, which is reflected by its ubiquitous expression in these tissues. However, it does not appear to determine response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. In contrast, lack of Bcl-2 expression was associated with a higher probability of complete pathological response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.     

老年患者术前心电图检查采集方法的探讨

目的探讨一种老年白内障患者术前心电图图像采集时降低图像基线偏移、防止肌电干扰更有效的方法。方法选取2020年6—10月我院东区眼科门诊,年龄60～85岁之间的老年白内障术前行心电图检查的患者600例,采用随机数字表法将患者分为研究组与对照组,每组各300例,研究组在采集图像时予以图示法干预后采集图像,对照组常规采集图像,之后对两组患者采集的图像,从ST段基线、肌电干扰、全身肌紧张情况、遵医顺从性和心电图复查率等方面进行比较。结果研究组心电图复查率为2.7%(8例),对照组为12.0%(36例),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论研究组图示法干预采集心电图图像优于对照组常规采集图像,可有效提高心电图正确诊断率,减少复查降低检查费用,降低老年患者在诊疗中的风险保证医疗质量。     

Fascia-iliaca compartment block vs intra-articular hip injection for preoperative pain management in intracapsular hip fractures: A blind,randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the fascia-iliaca compartment block and the intra-articular hip injection in terms of pain management and the need for additional systemic analgesia in the preoperative phase of intracapsular hip fractures.MethodsPatients >65 years old with an intracapsular hip fracture were randomized in this prospective, blind, controlled, parallel trial in a Level-I trauma center. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the fascia-iliaca compartment block (cohort FICB) or the intra-articular hip injection (cohort IAHI) upon admission to the emergency department. The primary outcome was pain relief at 20 min, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after the regional anesthesia, both at rest and during internal rotation of the fractured limb. The Numeric Rating Scale was used. Residual pain was managed with the same protocol in all patients. Additional analgesic drug administration during the 48 h from admission was recorded.ResultsA total of 120 patients with comparable baseline characteristics were analyzed in this study: the FICB group consisted of 70 subjects, while the IAHI group consisted of 50 subjects.Pain was significantly lower in the IAHI group during movement of the fractured limb at 20 min (p < 0.05), 12 h (p < 0.05), 24 h (p < 0.05) and 48 h (p < 0.05).In the FICB cohort 72.9% of patients needed to take oxycodone, in contrast to 28.6% of the IAHI cohort (p < 0.05). In the FICB cohort 14.09 ± 11.57 mg of oxycodone was administered, while in the IAHI cohort 4.38 ± 7.63 mg (p < 0.05). No adverse events related to either technique were recorded.ConclusionsIntra-articular hip injection provides better pre-operatory pain management in elder patients with intracapsular hip fractures compared to the fascia-iliaca compartment block. It also reduced the need for supplementary systemic analgesia.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level I.     

Treatment strategy for colorectal cancer with resectable synchronous liver metastases:Is any evidence-based strategy possible?

Fifteen percent to twenty-five percent of patients affected by colorectal cancer presents with liver metastases at diagnosis. In resectable cases, surgery is the only potentially curative treatment and achieves survival rates up to 50% at 5 years. Management is complex, as colorectal resection, liver resection, chemotherapy, and, in locally advanced mid/low rectal tumors, radiotherapy have to be integrated. Modern medical practice usually relies on evidence-based protocols. Levels of evidence for synchronous metastases are poor:published studies include few recent prospective series and several retrospective analyses collecting a limited number of patients across long periods of time. Data are difficult to be generalized and are mainly representative of single centre’s experience, biased by local recruitment, indications and surgical technique. In this context, surgeons have to renounce to "evidence-based medicine" and to adopt a sort of "experience-based medicine". Anyway, some suggestions are possible. Simultaneous colorectal and liver resection can be safely performed whenever minor hepatectomies are planned, while a case-by-case evaluation is mandatory in case of more complex procedures. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is preferentially scheduled for patients with advanced metastatic tumors to assess disease biology and to control lesions. It can be safely performed with primarytumor in situ , even planning simultaneous resection at its end. Locally advanced mid/low rectal tumor represents a further indication to neoadjuvant therapies, even if treatment’s schedule is not yet standardized. In summary, several issues have to be solved, but every single HPB centre should define its proper strategy to optimize patient’s selection, disease control and safety and completeness of surgery.     

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery versus long-course chemoradiation with delayed surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLong-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) with delayed surgery or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with immediate surgery is probably the most frequent regimen in the treatment of rectal cancer. Debate is still going on whether SCRT or LCRT is more effective. So we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SCRT with immediate surgery versus LCRT with delayed surgery for the management of rectal cancer.MethodsLiterature were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library up to May, 2014. Quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated according to the Cochrane's risk of bias tool of RCT. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were employed to explore heterogeneity.Results16 trials were included in the qualitative systematic review. 12 trials were included in meta-analyses. 4 of them were RCTs; other 8 were non-RCTs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence rate (LRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR), sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and late toxicity. Compared with SCRT, LCRT obviously increased pCR rate [RR = 0.15, 95%CI (0.08, 0.28), P = 0.003], while LCRT obviously increased the grade 3–4 acute toxicity [RR = 0.13, 95%CI (0.06, 0.28), P < 0.00001].ConclusionsSCRT with immediate surgery is as effective as LCRT with delayed surgery for treatment of rectal cancer in terms of OS, DFS, LRR, DMR, Sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and late toxicity. Though LCRT increased pCR rate, LCRT also increased acute toxicity compared with SCRT. SCRT is a better choice in centers with a long waiting list or lack of medical resources.