Optimal cut-off value of preprocedural geriatric nutritional risk index for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease

BackgroundMalnutrition measured by the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was reported to be associated with poor prognosis for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, the optimal cut-off value of preprocedural GNRI for critical limb ischemia (CLI) and intermittent claudication (IC) is unknown. We aimed to determine its optimal cut-off value for CLI or IC patients requiring endovascular revascularization.MethodsWe explored data of 2246 patients (CLI: n = 1061, IC: n = 1185) registered in the Tokyo-taMA peripheral vascular intervention research COmraDE (TOMA-CODE) registry, which prospectively enrolled consecutive PAD patients who underwent endovascular revascularization in 34 hospitals in Japan from August 2014 to August 2016. The optimal cut-off values of GNRI were assessed by the survival classification and regression tree (CART) analyses, and the survival curve analyses for major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLEs) were performed for these cut-off values.ResultsIn addition to the first cut-off value of 96.2 in CLI and 85.6 in IC, the survival CART provided an additional cut-off value of 78.2 in CLI and 106.0 in IC for further risk stratification. The survival curve was significantly stratified by the GNRI-based malnutrition status in both CLI [high risk: 47.7% (51/107), moderate: 30.1% (118/392), and low: 10.2% (53/520), log–rank p < 0.001] and IC [high risk: 14.3% (7/49), moderate: 4.5% (29/646), and low: 0.5% (2/407), log–rank p < 0.001]. The multivariate Cox-proportional hazard analysis showed that a higher GNRI was significantly associated with a better outcome in both CLI [hazard ratio (HR) per 1-point increase: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98, p < 0.001] and IC (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91–0.97, p < 0.001).ConclusionsPreprocedural nutritional status significantly stratified future events in patients with PAD. Given that the optimal cut-off value of GNRI in CLI was almost 10-points lower than that of IC, using a disease-specific cut-off value is important for risk stratification.     

Screening and Quantification of Depression in Mild-to-Moderate Dementia Through the GDS Short Forms

Abstract

We evaluated the validity of the 1-, 4- and 15-item versions of the GDS in 51 patients affected by mild to moderate dementia, using the long form as standard. The following sensitivity and specificity values were obtained: 66% and 91% for GDS-1, 93% and 87% for GDS-4, 79% and 100% for GDS-15. GDS-15 also showed good agreement with GDS-30 in defining the severity of depression. These findings support the use of GDS-4 for the screening of depression and of GDS-15 for its severity assessment.     

Is prescribed lower extremity weight-bearing status after geriatric lower extremity trauma associated with increased mortality?

ObjectivesEvaluate whether mortality after discharge is elevated in geriatric fracture patients whose lower extremity weight-bearing is restricted.DesignRetrospective cohort studySettingUrban Level 1 trauma centerPatients/participants1746 patients >65 years of ageInterventionPost-operative lower extremity weight-bearing statusMain outcome measureMortality, as determined by the Social Security Death IndexResultsUnivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who were weight-bearing as tolerated on bilateral lower extremities (BLE) had significantly higher 5-year mortality compared to patients with restricted weight-bearing on one lower extremity and restricted weight-bearing on BLE (30%, 21% and 22% respectively, p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis controlling for variables including age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Injury Severity Scale, combined UE/LE injury, injury mechanism (high vs low), sex, BMI and GCS demonstrated that, in comparison to patients who were weight bearing as tolerated on BLE, restricted weight-bearing on one lower extremity had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.20, p = 0.76) and restricted weight-bearing in BLE had a HR of 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.36, p = 0.73).ConclusionsIn geriatric patients, prescribed weight-bearing status did not have a statistically significant association with mortality after discharge, when controlling for age, sex, body mass index, medical comorbidities, Injury Severity Scale (ISS), mechanism of injury, nonoperative treatment and admission GCS. This remained true in when the analysis was restricted to operative injuries only.     

Promoting Faculty Support and Participation in Geriatric Teaching Programs

No abstract available for this article.