侵犯眶内鼻窦囊肿的手术治疗

目的探讨改良眉弓径路联合鼻内镜技术在侵犯眶内的哑铃形筛窦囊肿手术中的应用及疗效分析。方法2002年8月N2012年4月我科收治的7例侵犯眼眶的哑铃形巨大筛窦囊肿患者,全麻下采用改良眉弓切口,鼻内镜辅助下沿眶壁分离并切除眶内囊肿,然后采用鼻内镜囊肿造袋术,切除囊肿。结果7例患者术中眶内及鼻窦囊肿均能充分暴露,并在直视下全部去除。术后无脑脊液鼻漏、眶筋膜损伤和眶内、颅内感染等并发症。术后随访6-18个月,均未见复发。结论采用改良眉弓径路联合鼻内镜行侵犯眶内的哑铃形筛窦囊肿手术,增加了手术的精确性和安全性,切口短,瘢痕小,切除彻底,降低复发率,减少对面部美观的影响,是治疗侵犯眶内的巨大哑铃形筛窦囊肿的有效术式之一。     

食管裂孔疝伴胃食管反流病的胃食管动力学研究

目的:探讨食管裂孔疝(HH)伴胃食管反流病(GERD)患者与单纯HH及GERD患者之间的内镜、24h食管pH监测、食管测压、胃动力学检查之间的相关性.方法:经胃镜确诊的HH伴GERD患者61例,同期内镜确诊单纯HH患者28例,GERD患者30例,在一周内进行24h食管pH监测、食管下端括约肌(LES)压力测定及胃磁图测定胃半排空时间.结果: GERD中pH监测诊断同内镜诊断相符合占83.52%,不符合占16.48%.24h pH监测中,HH伴GERD组患者的总反流时间、卧位反流时间及立位反流时间百分比均显著高于GERD组和HH组,GERD组显著高于HH组;HH伴GERD组LESP显著低于HH组和GERD组,HH组LESP显著低于GERD组;HH伴GERD组LESL显著短于GERD组,HH伴GERD组和HH组LESL无显著差异,HH组LESL显著短于GERD组;HH伴GERD组LESR显著高于HH组和GERD组,HH组LESR显著高于GERD组;HH伴GERD组胃排空延缓者显著多于HH组,但与GERD组无显著差异,GERD组胃排空延缓者显著多于HH组.     

消化道出血150例临床分析

目的探讨消化道出血的临床特征及诊治特点。方法对2010年1～12月蚌埠市第三人民医院消化科收治的150例消化道出血患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 (1)一般资料:男∶女=1.88∶1(98/52),年龄16～99岁,平均年龄(59.25±20.18)岁。老年组患病率明显高于青、中年组(54.0%比20.7%和54.0%比25.3%,P值均为0.000)。(2)服用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)急性胃黏膜病变发生率(20.7%)明显高于不服用者(3.2%),P=0.002。(3)72.0%(108/150)的患者伴有贫血,以重度为主(P=0.000)(,4)急诊胃镜确诊率(93.1%)明显高于非急诊胃镜确诊率(72.9%),P=0.002;急诊结肠镜与非急诊结肠镜确诊率无统计学意义(25.0%比66.8%,P=0.110)。结论消化道出血以老年患者多见;服用NSAIDs是上消化道出血的重要原因之一;急诊胃镜检查有助于上消化道出血的诊断,急诊结肠镜对下消化道出血诊断意义不明显。     

吲哚菁绿分子荧光影像技术在乳腺癌单孔法腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术中的应用

目的:探讨吲哚菁绿(ICG)分子荧光影像技术在单孔法腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术中的应用价值.方法:选取2019年3月至2019年12月收治的行腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术的20例早期乳腺癌患者,均以ICG联合纳米碳混悬注射液作为示踪剂.手术切除的前哨淋巴结送术中冰冻病理检查及常规石蜡病理检查.比较前哨淋巴结检出率、前哨淋巴结转移数量...     

腔内泌尿技术Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期手术治疗结石性脓肾

目的:探讨运用腔内泌尿外科技术治疗结石性脓肾的疗效和价值.方法:对52例结石性脓肾患者,14例行Ⅰ期手术(包括4例行经皮肾镜取石术;6例经尿道输尿管镜取石术;4例行经皮穿刺肾造瘘引流联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术);38例行Ⅱ期手术,即Ⅰ期经皮肾穿刺造瘘引流,Ⅱ期腔内技术取石术或肾切除术.结果:48例患者肾盂、肾盏漏斗和输尿管梗阻部结石均被取净,6例行肾切除术;无术后大出血和感染性休克等严重并发症;36例随访1～12个月,34例肾功能得到不同程度的恢复.结论:腔内技术安全、有效、微创,保肾率高,应作为结石性脓肾的首选治疗方法,应根据具体情况选择Ⅰ期还是Ⅱ期手术.     

B超引导下经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗肾结石118例报告

目的:探讨B超引导下经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗肾结石的方法、疗效和安全性.方法:2005年7月～2007年9月采用B超引导下经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗肾结石118例,其中单侧113例,双侧5例,并对手术操作方法、并发症进行分析.结果:111例116侧成功施行经皮肾穿刺并建立F24经皮肾通道进行Ⅰ期碎石清石术;3例3侧经皮肾穿刺或扩张通道失败改行开放手术;3例3侧由于经皮肾通道扩张出血和1例1侧并发尿脓毒症而行Ⅱ期经皮肾镜碎石术.所有结石均被粉碎,Ⅰ期单侧结石清除率为70.7%(87/123侧).手术时间30～210 min,平均(105±51)min.术中失血量10～500 ml,平均60 ml.3例需输血,输血量平均400 ml.术后低、中度发热者36例,高热者4例,经选用合适的抗生素治疗,术后5天内体温恢复正常.2例术后1个月内继发真菌感染,出现肉眼血尿,经抗真菌治疗,血尿消失.结论:B超引导下经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗肾结石操作方法安全,疗效可靠.     

常规放大内镜联合病理诊断消化道早期癌专家共识

食管癌和胃癌均为我国常见的恶性肿瘤,提高生存率的关键在于早期发现。放大内镜技术在消化道早期癌的筛查和诊断中具有重要意义。中华医学会消化内镜学分会消化系早癌内镜诊断与治疗协作组及《中华消化内镜杂志》编委会组织相关专家,在前期发布的《上消化道肿瘤高危人群放大内镜检查中西部专家意见》的基础上,经多次讨论,形成了本共识。共识主要针对常规应用放大内镜进行上消化道早期癌筛查及与病理诊断联合应用的开展方法进行阐述,并对常规放大内镜筛查应用的临床场景做进一步的细化,以期为消化道早期癌筛查工作提供参考。     

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveAlthough full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) has been tried as the latest alternative technique to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interobody fusion (MIS-TLIF) since mid-2010, the evidence is still lacking. We compared the clinical outcome and safety of Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find literature comparing Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF. The results retrieved were last updated on December 11, 2020. The perioperative outcome included the operation time, blood loss, complication, and hospital stay. The clinical outcomes included Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the radiological outcome included pseudoarthosis rate with 12-month minimum follow-up. ResultsFour retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study comprising 423 patients (183 Endo-LIF and 241 MIS-TLIF) were included, and the pooled data analysis revealed low heterogeneity between studies in our review. Baseline characteristics including age and sex were not different between the two groups. Operation time was significantly longer in Endo-LIF (mean difference [MD], 23.220 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.669–35.771; p=0.001). However, Endo-LIF resulted in less perioperative blood loss (MD, -144.710 mL; 95% CI, 247.941–41.478; p=0.023). Although VAS back pain at final (MD, -0.120; p=0.586), leg pain within 2 weeks (MD, 0.005; p=0.293), VAS leg pain at final (MD, 0.099; p=0.099), ODI at final (MD, 0.141; p=0.093) were not different, VAS back pain within 2 weeks was more favorable in the Endo-LIF (MD, -1.538; 95% CI, -2.044 to -1.032; p<0.001). On the other hand, no statistically significant group difference in complication rate (relative risk [RR], 0.709; p=0.774), hospital stay (MD, -2.399; p=0.151), and pseudoarthrosis rate (RR, 1.284; p=0.736) were found. ConclusionRelative to MIS-TLIF, immediate outcomes were favorable in Endo-LIF in terms of blood loss and immediate VAS back pain, although complication rate, mid-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rate were not different. However, the challenges for Endo-LIF include longer operation time which means a difficult learning curve and limited surgical indication which means patient selection bias. Larger-scale, well-designed study with long-term follow-up and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm and update the results of this systematic review.     

翼管在内镜经鼻颅底手术中的标志作用

目的通过影像学和解剖学方法进行研究以明确翼管在鼻内镜经鼻颅底手术中的价值并为临床提供参考。方法选23具尸头行冠状位及轴位高分辨CT扫描,观察翼管及其与周围结构的关系,并测量相关距离。选其中3具经过动脉灌注的尸头,分别采用经上颌窦、经鼻至翼腭窝-海绵窦入路进行鼻内镜下的解剖学研究。结果高分辨CT能够清晰显示翼管形态、走行及其与周围结构的关系。所有翼管均位于颈内动脉管水平段或其以下层面。鼻内镜解剖与相应的影像学提示相同,翼管内容恒定地指向颈内动脉前膝;翼管和圆孔之间的距离标定了一个手术门户。结论翼管是内镜经鼻颅底手术的一个重要解剖标志,作为骨性管道,高分辨CT可以清晰显示翼管。     

内镜腹腔镜联合治疗胆总管结石150例报告

目的:探讨内镜腹腔镜联合治疗胆总管结石的价值。方法:回顾性分析150例胆总管结石患者经内镜腹腔镜联合治疗的临床资料。结果:本组患者全部治愈。120例患者接受了十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphicterotomy,EST)和十二指肠逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscapic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP);30例患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)+腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术(laparoscopic choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage,LCTD)。结论:内镜腹腔镜联合治疗胆总管结石优于传统手术,在具备较高内镜、腹腔镜技术水平的条件下是安全可行的,且可作为首选方式。