Combined skin prick and patch testing enhances identification of peanut-allergic patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Food atopy patch tests (APTs) are considered a useful tool for the diagnosis of food allergy. Hypersensitivity to peanuts has not been investigated by means of APTs so far. METHODS: APTs and skin prick tests (SPTs) with peanuts were performed in 136 atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. Relevance of positive and negative responses to these tests was assessed by repeated open challenges with peanuts. RESULTS: Nine percent of our AD patients reacted to the challenge. Positive responses to APTs were recorded in 19% of the patients, whereas in 12% positive SPTs were observed. APTs were more frequently positive in subjects with eczematous responses after challenge with respect to those with urticarial reactions. SPT reactivity proved to be higher in patients above 12 years of age, whereas APT positivity was more frequent in children under 6 years. APT sensitivity proved significantly higher than SPT sensitivity, in particular in children under 12 years of age. On the contrary, SPT specificity and positive predictive value were significantly higher with respect to those of APT in the age group of subjects under 6 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that APTs with peanuts may represent a useful integration to standard testing modalities employed for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in AD patients.     

Sensitization and lung function in workers occupationally exposed to natural thickening products

BACKGROUND: Three workers engaged in the manufacture of natural thickener products (Cassia spp., guar, and tamarind flour) were occupationally sensitized to Cassia spp. Therefore, a cross-sectional study on the prevalence of sensitization among and respiratory health of the employees of this plant was conducted. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two workers (36 with high, 26 with low exposure) participated in the survey. Skin prick tests and specific IgE tests with extracts of these components revealed that 11.3% were sensitized to Cassia spp. and 9.7% to at least one species of storage mites, with a significantly higher portion of atopic subjects in the sensitized group. Overall, 55% of the subjects reported work-related symptoms (upper and lower airways, eyes, or skin). FVC % pred. was significantly lower in highly exposed workers, while RV % pred. and RV%TLC % pred. were significantly higher in this group. In the multivariate model, sensitization was not a risk factor for impairment of lung function. CONCLUSIONS: Dust exposure to flours may not only cause allergic sensitization but also induce chronic changes in lung function.     

Diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients may be difficult to establish because ABPA shares many characteristics with coexisting atopy or other lung infections in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various paraclinical parameters in the diagnosis of ABPA in patients with CF. METHODS: Accumulated data from a 5-year period in 238 CF patients were used to divide patients into two groups designated the ABPA group (n=26) and the non-ABPA group (n = 35). Patients in both groups were colonized with Aspergillus fumigatus (Af.), but only the ABPA group consistently demonstrated specific IgE antibodies and specific precipitins. Patients without A. fumigatus colonization were not assigned to either of these groups (n = 177). By this selection as the true diagnosis, 10 patients were selected from the ABPA group and 10 patients from the non-ABPA group. RESULTS: The groups were comparable as to age, sex, lung function (P=0.6), and presence of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (P>0.1). No significant difference between the groups in unspecific atopic parameters such as eosinophil count (P=0.9) or eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in sputum, plasma, or serum (P=0.9, P=0.59, and P = 0.9, respectively) was demonstrated. Total IgE was significantly higher in the ABPA group (P<0.01). The groups were comparable in skin prick test (SPT) positivity to a standard panel of aeroallergens (pollen, dander, molds, and mites) (P>0.2). Statistically significantly higher levels in the ABPA group were demonstrated in specific IgE to Af. (P < 0.05), SPT positivity to Af. (P < 0.02), and Af. precipitins (P < 0.05). Histamine release (HR) to Af. tended to be higher (P=0.075) in the ABPA group. Specific IgE to Af. was determined by Magic Lite (ML), CAP, and Maxisorp (in-house RAST). The CAP level was one to two classes higher than the ML level; however, the results were comparable (r=0.66, P<0.005). IgE to Af. measured by CAP was the test which offered the highest positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Optimal diagnostic cutoff levels for the diagnosis of ABPA were determined: class 2 for HR to Af., 200 kIU/l for total IgE, and 3.5 (titer) for precipitating antibodies to Af., and class 2 for IgE to Af. (by CAP System). CONCLUSIONS: Unspecific atopy markers were of limited value for the diagnosis of ABPA. Patients with ABPA do not seem to be more atopic to other aeroallergens than non-ABPA patients. The most valid parameters for the diagnosis of ABPA in CF are SPT to Af., IgE to Af. in combination with precipitating antibodies to Af., and/or total IgE.     

Profilin-mediated food-induced allergic reactions are associated with oral epithelial remodeling

1. Download high-res image (218KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe--a survey from the GALEN network

Skin prick testing (SPT) is the standard method for diagnosing allergic sensitization but is to some extent performed differently in clinical centres across Europe. There would be advantages in harmonizing the standard panels of allergens used in different European countries, both for clinical purposes and for research, especially with increasing mobility within Europe and current trends in botany and agriculture. As well as improving diagnostic accuracy, this would allow better comparison of research findings in European allergy centres. We have compared the different SPT procedures operating in 29 allergy centres within the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN). Standard SPT is performed similarly in all centres, e.g. using commercial extracts, evaluation after 15-20 min exposure with positive results defined as a wheal >3 mm diameter. The perennial allergens included in the standard SPT panel of inhalant allergens are largely similar (e.g. cat: pricked in all centres; dog: 26 of 29 centres and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus: 28 of 29 centres) but the choice of pollen allergens vary considerably, reflecting different exposure and sensitization rates for regional inhalant allergens. This overview may serve as reference for the practising doctor and suggests a GA(2)LEN Pan-European core SPT panel.     

Influence of the histamine control on skin reactivity in skin testing

We investigated the effect of the histamine control (1 mg/ml) on the results of skin prick and intradermal testing with bee and wasp venom. Skin tests were done on the patients' forearms: on the right arm the histamine control and the bee venom dilutions, on the left arm the wasp venom dilutions only, at distances of 4-5 cm. In intradermal testing 11 (9%) of 122 patients showed a positive wheal and flare reaction to the bee venom solution positioned next to the histamine control. The subsequent solutions in higher concentrations did not produce any skin reactions. The results of intradermal testing with bee venom did not occur in intradermal testing with wasp venom or in skin prick testing with both allergens. Our results show clearly that in skin prick tests a distance of 4-5 cm is sufficient to avoid false positive skin reactions. However, using the same distance in intradermal testing showed that histamine affects the skin reactions produced by adjacent allergen solutions. Therefore false positive results may occur.     

Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential

BACKGROUND: In our clinic we routinely patch test patients referred from occupational health for the investigation of latex contact urticaria. We also undertake both patch and prick testing (where indicated) in patients referred with persistent dermatitis/eczema. If investigation of allergic skin disease is undertaken by a non-dermatologist, it is unlikely that patch testing will be performed. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a retrospective analysis of patients who had been prick tested to establish whether an incomplete diagnosis would have been reached if patch testing had been omitted. METHODS: Details of patients who had attended for patch testing between July 2004 and December 2005 were analysed. Patients who had had prick tests and patch testing were identified. The outcomes of prick tests and patch testing were documented together with the clinical relevance. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty out of 1060 patients referred to the clinic were prick tested. 54.2% patients were referred from dermatologists. 26.6% were referred from occupational health, 68 patients had positive reactions on prick testing of whom 36 had positive patch tests (52.9%), which were of current relevance in 27 patients (39.7%). Nine out of 106 health workers referred to exclude latex contact urticaria had positive prick tests to latex. Fifty of these patients demonstrated delayed-type hypersensitivity with nickel, cobalt, rubber and its additives being the most common allergens found. Of the 262 patients who had negative prick tests, 121 had positive patch tests (46.1%) of current relevance to patient history in 92 subjects (35.1%). While none of the six patients referred for investigation of reaction to local anaesthetics had a positive prick test, one was allergic to local anaesthetic on patch testing. CONCLUSION: Omission of patch testing from the investigation of allergic skin disease, even when contact urticaria may be the sole suspected diagnosis, would result in the frequent missed diagnosis of contact allergy. We recommend that patients with suspected allergic skin disease are investigated in an environment where investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity can be undertaken. In particular, patients with atopic eczema, suspected latex rubber allergy, hand dermatitis (particularly occupational) and drug reactions should be targeted to receive both investigations.     

Immediate hypersensitivity to Malassezia furfur and Candida albicans mannans in vivo and in vitro

BACKGROUND: Elevated and correlative Malassezia furfur (M. furfur) and Candida albicans (C. albicans) mannan-specific IgE have been demonstrated in atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome (AEDS) of the head, neck and shoulder (HNS) region of the skin. The significance of these antibodies in vivo has not been demonstrated. METHODS: Sixty-five AEDS patients with HNS distribution were included. Serum total IgE (S-IgE) and yeast antigen-specific (Cetavlon-purified mannan and whole extract antigens of M. furfur and C. albicans) IgE were measured and skin prick tests (SPT) were performed with the yeast antigens. RESULTS: Mannan-specific IgE and SPT were positive in 51 and 48% of patients with M. furfur and in 42 and 22% with C. albicans, respectively. Whole extract-specific IgE and SPT were positive in 85 and 95% of patients with M. furfur and in 91 and 57% with C. albicans, respectively. The highest correlation between specific IgE and SPT was seen with M. furfur mannan (r = 0.60; P < 0.0001). Both M. furfur mannan-specific IgE (r = 0.76; P < 0.0001) and SPT (r = 0.44; P = 0.0005) correlated with S-IgE. CONCLUSIONS: Mannan-induced immediate hypersensitivity in vivo was demonstrated in SPT. The significant correlation between M. furfur mannan-specific IgE and SPT suggests that mannan is an important allergen in yeast hypersensitive AEDS in vivo.