The reorganization kinetics of the “original” lamellar diblock copolymer poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐poly(4‐vinylpyridine) crystals formed at 260 K is studied in the melting region from 270 K (10 K below the onset of the melting peak of original crystals) to 310 K (the melting peak temperature) on the time scale starting from 10?4 to 102 s by ultrafast differential scanning calorimetry. Different reorganization pathways are observed in this temperature range. Annealing at temperatures below 295 K leads to further stabilization of original crystals by secondary crystallization. At annealing temperatures higher than 295 K, crystals partially melt and the reorganization occurs via the melting–recrystallization. For even higher temperature, such as 310 K, the melting is completed within a few milliseconds and recrystallization starts from the nuclei formation. The sigmoidal recrystallization kinetics is analyzed by the Avrami equation. It is found that the copolymer experiences about one order of magnitude slower recrystallization rate and has higher melting peak temperatures of crystals formed after recrystallization than the homopolymer. The slower recrystallization kinetics in the copolymer is discussed from the viewpoint of the nanoscale spatial constraint and the intermediate state prior to the recrystallization.
Lamellar ichthyosis (LI) is characterized by generalized scaling of the skin and is often resistant to ordinary emollients. Recently, Locobase(R) fatty cream containing a mixture of 5% lactic acid and 20% propylene glycol (LPL) was found to be markedly effective in a pilot study. To consolidate this finding, a double-blind study comparing LPL with the corresponding mixture in Essex(R) (Diprobase(R)) cream (LPE) and Locobase(R) fatty cream containing either 5% urea or 20% propylene glycol was conducted in 20 patients with LI. Before and after applying the creams twice daily on each of the four extremities for 4 weeks, the following investigations were performed: scoring of xerosis, scaling and erythema, measurements of skin hydration (capacitance) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and moulding of the skin surface (replicas). Xerosis was reduced by all four creams, but significantly more so by LPL (P < 0.001) and LPE (P < 0.01). Scaling was only reduced by LPL (P < 0.001) and LPE (P < 0.01), which also caused a slight increase in the erythema score (P < 0.05 for both). The patients' weekly evaluation of symptoms showed that LPL produced the most rapid effect: the response rate after 4 weeks was 63%. Skin hydration and TEWL were both significantly increased by LPL and LPE, whereas skin roughness was reduced most by LPL. Fourteen patients preferred LPL over the other cream formulations. Ten patients continued using LPL for up to 8 weeks with good results and no side-effects other than occasional irritation in the skin folds. LPL is a major advance in the topical treatment of LI that suits most patients. Some patients, however, seem to prefer the more hydrophilic LPE formulation. Both formulations effectively reduce hyperkeratosis and xerosis, but may cause slight irritation and adversely affect the epidermal barrier function. 相似文献
下载免费PDF全文