Effects of epidural bupivacaine and epidural morphine on bowel function and pain after hysterectomy

A comparison was made of the effects of continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and intermittent epidural morphine on bowel function after abdominal hysterectomy. The duration of postoperative ileus was assessed as the time from the end of operation to the first postoperative passage of flatus and feces. Twenty-two patients were randomly allocated to two equal groups. An "epidural morphine" group received general anesthesia and epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief, and an "epidural bupivacaine" group was given combined general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine intraoperatively and epidural analgesia with 0.25% bupivacaine postoperatively. Epidural morphine or bupivacaine was given for 42 h postoperatively. Pain intensity (visual analog scale) was low in both groups, but lower (P less than 0.05) in the epidural bupivacaine group. The time to first passage of flatus was 22 +/- 16 h in the epidural bupivacaine group and 56 +/- 22 h in the epidural morphine group (P less than 0.001). The time to first postoperative passage of feces was shorter (P less than 0.05) in the former than in the latter 57 +/- 44 h vs 92 +/- 22 h). The patients of the epidural bupivacaine group started intake of oral fluids earlier (P less than 0.01) and to a greater extent (P less than 0.05) than those in the epidural morphine group. It is concluded that the duration of postoperative ileus after hysterectomy is shorter when epidural bupivacaine is given for postoperative pain relief than when this is achieved by epidural morphine.     

Intra-articular morphine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following knee arthroscopy

In a prospective, double blind, randomized study, 30 ASA I patients were allocated to three groups depending on the drug injected intra-articularly, in an attempt to establish the best postoperative analgesic protocol following knee arthroscopy. Group 1 received 3 mg of preservative-free morphine in 25 ml saline; group 2, 5 mg of preservative-free morphine in 25 ml saline; and group 3, 25 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. The degree of postoperative pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale and the need for additional analgesics at 1, 2, 3, 8 and 24 h. We conclude that bupivacaine 0.25% provides analgesia of early onset and of short duration. While 3 mg-preservative free morphine provides moderate postoperative analgesia with peak effect during the eighth postoperative hour, 5 mg preservative-free morphine provides effective and long lasting (more than 24 h) pain relief. No side effects were noted.     

Continuous blockade of the lumbar plexus after knee surgery: a comparison of the plasma concentrations and analgesic effect of bupivacaine 0.250% and 0.125%

In 20 patients a continuous block of the lumbar plexus was administered after knee-joint surgery, and the analgesic effect of two different concentrations of bupivacaine was compared. The same volume of bupivacaine was given to both groups of patients: a bolus dose of 0.4 ml/kg, 0.5% or 0.25%, followed by infusion of 0.14 ml/kg/h, 0.25% or 0.125%, respectively, via a catheter placed in the neurovascular fascial sheath of the femoral nerve according to the "3-in-1 block" technique. The median morphine consumption during the first 16 h postoperatively was 6.0 mg when bupivacaine 0.5/0.25% was used and 9.5 mg when 0.25/0.125% was used. This difference is not significant. The visual analogue pain scores were also similar in the two groups (P greater than 0.05). All plasma concentrations were below 4 micrograms/ml, the highest concentration measured being 3.6 micrograms/ml. It is concluded that when used for a continuous block of the lumbar plexus after knee-joint surgery, bupivacaine in a concentration of 0.125% offers the same pain relief as a concentration of 0.25%, and the risk of toxic reactions is reduced.     

罗哌卡因与布比卡因用于硬膜外阻滞的临床对比观察

目的：将新型酰胺类局麻药罗哌卡因药效学与布比卡因进行比较。方法：选择行择期下肢手术病人40例,随机分成四组进行硬膜外麻醉,分别在硬膜外注入0．75％罗哌卡因（n=10例）,0．5％罗哌卡因（n=10例）和0．75％布比卡因（n=10例）,0．5％布比卡因（n=10例）15－18ml。分别观察感觉阻滞起效,最大运动阻滞,感觉、运动恢复时间及最高阻滞平面,最大Bromage评分及术中不良反应的情况。结果：罗哌卡因起效快,产生的麻醉平面广,镇痛、运动阻滞效果好。术中有低血压、心率减慢等副作用发生。结论：罗哌卡因应用于临床麻醉有可靠的麻醉性能及安全性,利用其感觉运动神经分离作用,利于病人术后早期活动,具有良好的临床应用前景。     

Intrapleural analgesia in a child with a mediastinal tumour

A case is presented of an eight-year-old child with a mediastinal tumour, who had developed acute renal failure following the institution of steroid therapy. Intrapleural analgesia was successfully used for the insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter so that the considerable risks of general anaesthesia were avoided. Subsequent dialysis allowed chemotherapy to commence and, as a result of the shrinkage in tumour size, general anaesthesia was administered safely two days later. The purpose of this report is to highlight the use of intrapleural analgesia in children as an alternative to general anaesthesia, when the latter is contraindicated. The mechanism of action of intra-pleural analgesia and the risks of anaesthesia in the presence of a mediastinal tumour are discussed.     

Focus on mobilisation after lower abdominal surgery. A double-blind randomised comparison of epidural bupivacaine with morphine vs. lidocaine with morphine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Epidural infusion of morphine, usually with bupivacaine, for postoperative pain relief has proved to be safe and effective. Lidocaine with its short duration of action and low toxicity may be an alternative to bupivacaine. The clinical importance of the choice of local anaesthetic drug on mobilisation after lower abdominal surgery has not been studied previously. METHODS: A total of 52 patients was randomised to epidural infusion of morphine (1.6-4.4 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) with either lidocaine (0.44-0.98 mg.kg-1.h-1) or bupivacaine (0.10-0.28 mg.kg-1.h-1) in a double-blind fashion. The time to mobilisation, degree of pain relief, blood pressure, respiration and motor function were recorded at regular intervals postoperatively for 40 h. Serum concentrations of lidocaine, its main metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and bupivacaine were measured at 3, 15 and 40 h. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two patient groups. There were no significant differences in the time from the end of surgery to the time the patients were able to stand without support (bupivacaine: median 24 h (interquartile range (IQR): 22-31), lidocaine: median 28 h (IQR 23-40), P = 0.15) or were able to walk without support (bupivacaine: median 46 h (IQR 28-62), lidocaine: median 48 h (IQR 35-54), P = 0.78). No significant differences between the groups were recorded with respect to pain relief, blood pressure, respiration, sedation score and motor function. The plasma concentration of lidocaine and bupivacaine increased significantly during the treatment period (P < 0.01 for both drugs), but not the concentration of MEGX. The highest venous lidocaine concentration was 17.5 mumol/l and the highest bupivacaine concentration was 18.8 mumol/l. There was a significant correlation between the concentration of both lidocaine and bupivacaine and the concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) (lidocaine: r = 0.77, P < 0.001, bupivacaine: r = 0.60, P < 0.001), suggesting that the free fraction of the drugs did not increase. No patients showed serious signs of toxicity. The epidural infusion rates remained stable in both groups during the study period. CONCLUSION: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the postoperative course after lower abdominal surgery in patients who received an epidural infusion of morphine combined with bupivacaine as compared to patients who received morphine with lidocaine. Further clinical studies to establish the place of lidocaine in postoperative epidural analgesia should be performed.     

The influence of baricity on the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5%

This study compared the haemodynamic effects of subarachnoid block with plain bupivacaine 0.5% (dextrose-free), heavy bupivacaine 0.5% (in dextrose 8%) and a mixture of these two solutions, i.e. bupivacaine 0.5% in dextrose 4%. Thirty-six male patients, aged 55-89 years, undergoing transurethral surgery were recruited. Invasive systolic arterial and central venous pressures were recorded at 5-s intervals after the block was initiated using a computerised data-collection system. The height of sensory blockade was recorded at 5-min intervals. No preload was given and episodes of hypotension were treated with colloid (8 ml x kg(-1)) and, if this was ineffective, a metaraminol infusion. Systolic arterial and central venous pressures decreased in all three groups following block (p < 0.05). These decreases were more rapid in onset in the heavy bupivacaine group compared with plain bupivacaine group (p < 0.005). Patients in the heavy bupivacaine group also had a greater requirement for early treatment of hypotension (< 10 min) and treatment with metaraminol (p < 0.05). The onset of sensory blockade was more rapid in the heavy group compared with the mixed group, although final sensory levels were similar. The onset of haemodynamic and sensory changes are more rapid when using heavy bupivacaine intrathecally. This leads to a higher and earlier incidence of hypotension and requirement for treatment.     

Succinylcholine does not worsen bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity in pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs

The intravascular injection of a large dose of bupivacaine induces electrophysiological cardiac impairment, mainly by slowing ventricular conduction velocity, and haemodynamic depression, by a decrease in myocardial contractility. When cardiotoxicity occurs, succinylcholine rapidly stops convulsions. However, the possible interactions between bupivacaine and succinylcholine on cardiac electrophysiology and haemodynamic status have never been investigated. Thus, we used an experimental electrophysiological model involving closed-chest dogs. Three groups (n = 6) of pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs were given 0.2 mg.kg-1 atropine iv. Dogs in Group 1 were given saline. The others received 4 mg.kg-1 bupivacaine iv over ten seconds. Dogs in Group 2 were then given saline and those in Group 3 were then given 2 mg.kg-1 succinylcholine iv from one to two minutes after the administration of bupivacaine. The following electrophysiological variables were measured: heart rate represented by RR interval (RR), PR, atria-His (AH), and His-ventricle (HV) intervals, QRS duration, and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc). The following haemodynamic variables were measured: mean aortic pressure (MAoP), the peak of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dt max), and LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Comparison between Groups 1 and 2 showed that bupivacaine induced more than 100% HV interval lengthening and QRS widening (P less than 0.01), prolonged QTc interval by more than 25% (P less than 0.01), and decreased LV dP/dt max by more than 50% (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery

Epidural infusions of fentanyl, in a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration, combined with bupivacaine 0.1% were compared with epidural infusions of fentanyl alone for postoperative analgesia following abdominal or thoracic surgery. There were no detectable differences between the two groups in analgesia (mean visual analogue scale pain scores ranging between 15-35 mm), average infusion rates of 7-9 ml.hr-1, and serum fentanyl concentrations which reached 1-2 ng.ml-1. There was no difference in postoperative pulmonary function (pH, PaCO2, SaO2), or bowel function (time to flatus or po fluids). The incidence of side-effects including somnolence, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and postural hypotension was also similar. Of the patients receiving fentanyl and bupivacaine 0.1%, three developed a transient unilateral sensory loss to pinprick and ice, and two of these patients had unilateral leg weakness equal to a Bromage 1 score. The addition of bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve epidural infusions of fentanyl using a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration following abdominal or thoracic surgery.