首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   3909篇
  免费   314篇
  国内免费   102篇
耳鼻咽喉   24篇
儿科学   82篇
妇产科学   18篇
基础医学   606篇
口腔科学   27篇
临床医学   476篇
内科学   738篇
皮肤病学   46篇
神经病学   316篇
特种医学   129篇
外科学   493篇
综合类   417篇
一般理论   1篇
预防医学   310篇
眼科学   19篇
药学   361篇
  7篇
中国医学   154篇
肿瘤学   101篇
  2024年   14篇
  2023年   85篇
  2022年   123篇
  2021年   189篇
  2020年   144篇
  2019年   158篇
  2018年   151篇
  2017年   148篇
  2016年   158篇
  2015年   115篇
  2014年   208篇
  2013年   370篇
  2012年   200篇
  2011年   232篇
  2010年   185篇
  2009年   199篇
  2008年   183篇
  2007年   174篇
  2006年   139篇
  2005年   150篇
  2004年   95篇
  2003年   99篇
  2002年   97篇
  2001年   70篇
  2000年   63篇
  1999年   50篇
  1998年   50篇
  1997年   54篇
  1996年   57篇
  1995年   42篇
  1994年   51篇
  1993年   31篇
  1992年   25篇
  1991年   20篇
  1990年   27篇
  1989年   13篇
  1988年   15篇
  1987年   15篇
  1986年   6篇
  1985年   38篇
  1984年   17篇
  1983年   12篇
  1982年   14篇
  1981年   8篇
  1980年   11篇
  1979年   7篇
  1978年   5篇
  1975年   2篇
  1973年   2篇
  1972年   2篇
排序方式: 共有4325条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
121.
Today, nearly 90% of common bile duct stones are extracted endoscopically. Problems are encountered if there are large stones or a duct stenosis. Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) as well as intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) serve as an alternative to surgical intervention for those few patients in whom endoscopic measures have failed. A total of 35 patients with common bile duct stones in whom conventional endoscopic treatment had failed were selected on the condition that stone visualization through ultrasound was possible and that the papilla was within easy reach of the endoscope. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly treated either by EPL or EHL. The average age of our patients was 73 years. The main reasons for failure of conventional endoscopy were due to the large size of the stones (13 patients), impacted stones (16), or the presence of a biliary stricture (6). In the EPL group, visualization of the stones by ultrasound and ensuing treatment were possible in 16 of 18 patients (89%); stones could be fragmented in 15 patients. In 13 patients, the biliary tree could then be completely freed of calculi; the success rate was 72% for all the patients (13 of 18). On average, the patients had 2.3 treatments on the lithotripter, and 3870 shock waves were applied per treatment. In the EHL group stones were successfully fragmented in 13 of 17 patients (76.5%). The average number of treatments was 1.4. Comparing both therapies, there was no difference in stone-free rates. In both groups, additional endoscopic interventions were necessary to clear the bile duct. The mean number of lithotripsy sessions was less in the EHL group (1.4 vs 2.3). There were no major differences in average hospital stay, 30-day mortality was zero in both groups. Combined treatment including EPL, EHL, and intracorporeal laser lithotripsy was finally successful in 32 patients (91.5%). It is concluded that EHL might be the method of choice for smaller, single stones in the more proximal parts of the common bile duct. In these cases, complete duct clearance in one lithotripsy session can be achieved. Multiple and large stones are probably best accessible to EPL. With a combination of the methods described, the bile duct can be cleared of concrements in almost every instance. As a result, surgery for choledocholithiasis has become the absolute exception.This work was presented in part at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the american Gastroenterological Association in Boston and published in abstract form (Gastroenterology 104:A347, 1993).  相似文献   
122.

Objective

Eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Greater use of programme-led and focused interventions that are less resource-intensive might be part of the solution to this demand-capacity mismatch.

Method

In October 2022, a group of predominantly UK-based clinical and academic researchers, charity representatives and people with lived experience convened to consider ways to improve access to, and efficacy of, programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders in an attempt to bridge the demand-capacity gap.

Results

Several key recommendations were made across areas of research, policy, and practice. Of particular importance is the view that programme-led and focused interventions are suitable for a range of different eating disorder presentations across all ages, providing medical and psychiatric risk are closely monitored. The terminology used for these interventions should be carefully considered, so as not to imply that the treatment is suboptimal.

Conclusions

Programme-led and focused interventions are a viable option to close the demand-capacity gap for eating disorder treatment and are particularly needed for children and young people. Work is urgently needed across sectors to evaluate and implement such interventions as a clinical and research priority.  相似文献   
123.
In most countries, endoscopic sphincterotomy is the first-choice treatment for common bile-duct stones. In patients with residual gallbladder stones, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the next step. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy remains to be determined. An alternative approach of combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis consists of laparoscopic cholecystectomy together with laparoscopic stone removal. The advantage of this ‘single-stage’ therapy appears to be limited to patients with stones that can be removed transcystically. This approach is successful in about half of the patients. Laparoscopic common bile-duct exploration is technically more demanding, more time-consuming, and associated with increased postoperative morbidity. If transcystic removal is not possible, a postoperative ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy is a good option. Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy are also feasible, but require specific organisational efforts.Recurrence of choledocholithiasis after ES is reported in a considerable number of patients (6–21%), resulting from de novo primary stone formation or recurrent secondary migration from the gallbladder. Primary choledocholithiasis is associated with bactobilia and delayed bile-duct clearance, indicated by CBD dilation. Endoscopic reintervention is safe and usually easy to perform. Surgery should be reserved for intractable cases. In selected patients, an underlying lithogenic bile composition (low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis) should be identified, and preventive medical treatment with UDCA could be considered.
• in patients with combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis, endoscopic sphincterotomy should be followed by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even in the elderly; however, a ‘wait-and-see’ policy does not lead to higher mortality, and therefore expectant management can be advocated in case of significant contraindications to surgery
• laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic stone removal offers a one-stage treatment of patients with combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Laparoscopic transcystic duct clearance is associated with low morbidity and short hospital stay. In contrast, laparoscopic common bile-duct exploration remains a procedure with increased risk of biliary complications and prolonged hospital stay. In case of stones that cannot be removed transcystically, it may be wise to perform an intraoperative or early postoperative ERCP
• performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a ‘rendezvous’ procedure may be beneficial in selected patients (especially in case of earlier failed ERCP)
• laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with increased conversion rates to open procedure compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstones; laparoscopic cholecystectomy planned early after endoscopic sphincterotomy may reduce this risk
• morphological or functional bile-duct defects, indicated by a dilated CBD, may lead to bactobilia and biliary stasis, thus promoting primary stone formation
• in a subgroup of patients with recurrent bile-duct stones, an MDR3 gene mutation must be considered, resulting in low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis. These patients are characterised by early onset of symptoms, recurrence after cholecystectomy, hyperechogenic foci in the liver, and often a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Ursodeoxycholic acid is beneficial in these patients
• the optimal timing or ERCP in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (before, during, or after the operation) still needs to be defined.
• further data are needed to determine potentially increased incidence of conversion and postoperative complications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstones

References

1 L. Sarli, D.R. Iusco and L. Roncoroni, Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience, World J Surg 27 (2003), pp. 180–186. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (19)
2 L. Courvoisier, Casuistisch: statistische beitrage zur pathologie und chirurgie der Gallenwege. Leipzig 387, Vogel (1890) 57–58.
3 J.J. Gonzales, L. Sanz and J.L. Grana, Biliary lithiasis in the elderly patient: morbidity and mortality due to biliary surgery, Hepatogastroenterology 44 (1997), pp. 1565–1568.
4 L.E. Hammarstrom, T. Holmin and H. Stridbeck et al., Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ, Br J Surg 82 (1995), pp. 1516–1521. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (62)
5 J.P. Neoptolemos, D.L. Carr-Locke and D.P. Fossard, Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones, BMJ 294 (1987), pp. 470–474. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (133)
*6 E.M. Targarona, R.M. Perez Ayuso and J.M. Bordas et al., Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients, Lancet 347 (1996), pp. 926–929. Abstract | Article | PDF (563 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (92)
7 M. Classen and L. Demling, Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct, Dtsch Med Wochenschr 99 (1974), pp. 467–469.
8 K. Kawai, Y. Akasaka and K. Murakami et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the amulla of Vater, Gastrointest Endosc 20 (1974), pp. 148–151. Abstract | PDF (2433 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (201)
9 J. Hill, F. Martin and D.E.F. Tweedle, Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones, Br J Surg 78 (1992), pp. 554–557.
10 B.R. Davidson, J.P. Neoptolemos and D.L. Carr-Locke, Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery, Gut 29 (1988), pp. 114–120. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (76)
11 Y.C.A. Keulemans, E.A.J. Rauws and K. Huibregtse et al., Current management of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones, Gastrointest Endosc 46 (1997), pp. 514–519. Abstract | Article | PDF (670 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (24)
12 F. Dubois, G. Berthelot and H. Lavard, Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy, Presse Med 18 (1989), pp. 980–982. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (122)
*13 D. Boerma, E.A. Rauws and Y.C. Keulemans et al., Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial, Lancet 360 (2002), pp. 761–765. Article | PDF (89 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (81)
14 J.Y. Lau, C.K. Leow and T.M. Fung et al., Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients, Gastroenterology 130 (2006), pp. 96–103. Article | PDF (160 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (28)
15 R. Riciardi, S. Islam and J.J. Canete et al., Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 19–22. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
16 J.P. Dorman, M.E. Franklin and J.L. Glass, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy. An effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 12 (1998), pp. 926–928. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
17 A. Waage, C. Stromberg and C.-E. Leijonmarck et al., Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 1181–1185. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
18 A.M. Paganini and E. Lezoche, Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc 12 (1998), pp. 23–29. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
19 I.J. Martin, I.S. Baily and M. Rhodes et al., Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures, Ann Surg 228 (1998), pp. 29–34. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (65)
20 E. Thompson and S.E. Tranter, All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct, Br J Surg 89 (2002), pp. 1608–1612.
21 J.B. Petelin, Lessons learned from >12 years experience, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 1705–1715. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
22 J.P.Y. Ha, C.N. Tang and W.T. Siu et al., Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones, Hepatogastroenterology 51 (2004), pp. 1605–1608. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (15)
*23 A. Cuschieri, E. Lezoche and M. Morino et al., E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi, Surg Endosc 13 (1999), pp. 952–957. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (163)
*24 M. Rhodes, L. Sussman and L. Cohen et al., Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones, Lancet 351 (1998), pp. 159–161. Abstract | Article | PDF (56 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (175)
*25 L.K. Nathanson, N.A. O'Rourke and I.J. Martin et al., Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of elected bile duct calculi. A randomized trial, Ann Surg 242 (2005), pp. 188–192. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)
26 G.D. De Palma, L. Angrisani and M. Lorenzo et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction for management of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 10 (1996), pp. 649–652. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (19)
27 N. Basso, G. Pizzuto and D. Surgo et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999), pp. 532–535. Abstract | Article | PDF (24 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (25)
28 L. Enochsson, B. Lindberg and F. Swahn et al., Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience, Surg Endosc 18 (2004), pp. 367–371. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
29 F. Lella, F. Bagnolo and C. Rebuffat et al., Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called ‘rendezvous’ technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis, Surg Endosc 20 (2006), pp. 419–423. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
30 D.F. Hong, Y. Xin and D.W. Chen, Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 20 (2006), pp. 424–427. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (6)
31 M. Neubrand, M. Sackmann and W.F. Caspary et al., Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten zur Behandlung von Gallensteinen, Z Gastroenterol 38 (2000), pp. 449–468. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (23)
*32 E.H. Livingston and R.V. Rege, Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare, J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005), pp. 426–433. Article | PDF (316 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (12)
*33 P.A. Abboud, P.F. Malet and J.A. Berlin et al., Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis, Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996), pp. 450–455.
34 L. Santucci, G. Natalini and L. Sarpi et al., Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study, Am J Gastroenterol 91 (1996), pp. 1326–1330. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (29)
35 J. Bingener-Casey, M.L. Richards and W.E. Strodel et al., Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10 year review, J Gastrointest Surg 6 (2002), pp. 800–805. Abstract | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
36 E.H. Livingston and R.V. Rege, A nationwide study of conversion from laparosocpic to open cholecystectomy, Am J Surg 188 (2004), pp. 205–211. Article | PDF (64 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (53)
37 A.J. McMahon, I.T. Russell and G. Ramsay et al., Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function, Surgery 115 (1994), pp. 533–539. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (129)
38 A. Ros, L. Gustafsson and H. Krook et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized, single-blind study, Ann Surg 234 (2001), pp. 741–749. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (62)
39 H.I. Hendolin, M.E. Paakonen and E.M. Alhava et al., Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response, Eur J Surg 166 (2000), pp. 394–399. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (52)
40 J.S. Barkun, A.N. Barkun and J.S. Sampalis et al., Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group, Lancet 340 (1992), pp. 1116–1119. Abstract | Article | PDF (585 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (205)
41 S. Hasukic, D. Mesic and E. Dizdarevic et al., Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, Surg Endosc 16 (2002), pp. 163–165.
42 U. Berggren, T. Gordh and D. Grama et al., Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses, Br J Surg 81 (1994), pp. 1362–1365. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (152)
43 J. Sand, I. Airo and K.M. Hiltunen et al., Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy, Am Surg 58 (1992), pp. 324–328. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (33)
44 A. Hamy, S. Hennekinne and P. Pessaux et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholcystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 872–875. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
45 L. Sarli, D. Iusco and G. Sgobba et al., Gallstone pancreatitis. A 10-year experience of combined endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment, Surg Endosc 16 (2002), pp. 975–980. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (12)
46 A. Vries de, S. Donkervoort and A.A.W. Geloven van et al., Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?, Surg Endosc 19 (2005), pp. 996–1001.
47 J.Y. Sung, J.W. Leung and E.A. Shaffer et al., Ascending infection of the biliary tract after surgical sphincterotomy and biliary stenting, J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 (1992), pp. 240–245. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (51)
48 J.C. Pereira-Lima, R. Jakobs and U.H. Winter et al., Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms, Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998), pp. 457–464. Abstract | Article | PDF (89 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (75)
49 S. Ikeda, M. Tanaka and S. Matsumoto et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-up, Endoscopy 20 (1988), pp. 13–17. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (56)
50 D.I. Kim, M.H. Kim and S.K. Lee et al., Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001), pp. 42–48. Article | PDF (82 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (24)
51 J.J. Bergman, S. van der Mey and E.A. Rauws et al., Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age, Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996), pp. 643–649. Abstract | Article | PDF (827 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (112)
52 K.H. Lai, L.F. Lin and G.H. Lo et al., Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?, Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999), pp. 483–487. Abstract | Article | PDF (42 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (35)
53 T. Ando, T. Tsuyuguchi and T. Okugawa et al., Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy, Gut 52 (2003), pp. 116–121. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (22)
54 G. Costamagna, A. Tringali and S.K. Shah et al., Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence, Endoscopy 34 (2002), pp. 273–279. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (45)
55 E. Seifert, Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), Endoscopy 20 (1988) (supplement 1), pp. 232–235. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
56 K.H. Lai, N.J. Peng and G.H. Lo et al., Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy, Gut 41 (1997), pp. 399–403. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (21)
57 W.W. Ng, K.H. Lai and R.S. Liu et al., Biliary motility following endoscopic sphincterotomy for recurrent common bile duct stones, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 56 (1995), pp. 159–165. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (5)
58 J.W. Leung, J.Y. Sung and J.W. Costerton, Bacteriological and electron microscopy examination of brown pigment stones, J Clin Microbiol 27 (1989), pp. 915–921. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
59 M. Sugiyama, Y. Suzuki and N. Abe et al., Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy, Gut 53 (2004), pp. 1856–1859. Full Text via CrossRef
60 S. Sultan and J. Baillie, Recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy 1, Gut 53 (2004), pp. 1725–1727. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (3)
61 K.H. Lai, G.H. Lo and C.K. Lin et al., Do patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis after endoscopic sphincterotomy benefit from regular follow-up?, Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002), pp. 523–526. Abstract | PDF (52 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
62 D.J. Geenen, J.E. Geenen and F.M. Jafri et al., The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones, Endoscopy 30 (1998), pp. 18–20. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
*63 R.H. Hawes, P.B. Cotton and A.G. Vallon, Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy, Gastroenterology 98 (1990), pp. 1008–1012. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (104)
64 F. Prat, N.A. Malak and G. Pelletier et al., Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, Gastroenterology 110 (1996), pp. 894–899. Abstract | PDF (80 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (81)
65 M.D. Apstein and M.C. Carey, Pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones: a parsimonious hypothesis, Eur J Clin Invest 26 (1996), pp. 343–352. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (73)
66 J.J. Smit, A.H. Schinkel and R.P. Oude Elferink et al., Homozygous disruption of the murine mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease, Cell 75 (1993), pp. 451–462. Abstract | Article | PDF (10874 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (779)
67 M. Fracchia, S. Pellegrino and P. Secreto et al., Biliary lipid composition in cholesterol microlithiasis, Gut 48 (2001), pp. 702–706. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
*68 O. Rosmorduc, B. Hermelin and R. Poupon, MDR3 gene defect in adults with symptomatic intrahepatic and gallbladder cholesterol cholelithiasis, Gastroenterology 120 (2001), pp. 1459–1467. Abstract | PDF (2149 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (128)
69 O. Rosmorduc, B. Hermelin and P.Y. Boelle et al., ABCB4 gene mutation-associated cholelithiasis in adults, Gastroenterology 125 (2003), pp. 452–459. Article | PDF (253 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (83)
70 K. Uchiyama, H. Onishi and M. Tani et al., Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis, Ann Surg 238 (2003), pp. 97–102. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
71 D.G. Maxton, D.E. Tweedle and D.F. Martin, Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting, Gut 36 (1995), pp. 446–449. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
72 J.J. Bergman, E.A. Rauws and J.G. Tijssen et al., Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients, Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995), pp. 195–201. Abstract | Article | PDF (1225 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (77)
*73 E. Roda, F. Bazzoli and A.M. Labate et al., Ursodeoxycholic acid vs. chenodeoxycholic acid as cholesterol gallstone-dissolving agents: a comparative randomized study, Hepatology 2 (1982), pp. 804–810. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
  相似文献   
124.
BACKGROUND: Viral cold is thought to be the major contributing factor in the pathogenesis of sinusitis, as it causes ostiomeatal obstruction. The aim was to evaluate whether paranasal sinus functioning during viral colds is similar in subjects with and without allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Forty-eight volunteers were examined during an early (2-4 days) natural cold and again 3 weeks later. The examinations included computed tomography (CT) scans, nasal mucosal biopsies, and viral and bacterial specimens. Subjects with positive skin prick tests and persistent or intermittent rhinitis were considered to have allergic immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated rhinitis. In addition, specific IgE antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) were measured. RESULTS: Nine subjects (19%) had allergic rhinitis. The allergic subjects were significantly more often IgE sensitized to SEB than the nonallergic subjects (33%vs 3%, P = 0.02). Viral etiology of the cold was identified in 32 (67%) subjects. The subjects with allergic rhinitis had significantly higher CT scores compared with nonallergic subjects during the colds (median (range) scores 16 (6-22) vs 6 (0-17), P = 0.004). In both groups, the median scores declined markedly during convalescence, but the difference remained significant (P = 0.009). Among the allergic subjects, those who were IgE sensitized to SEB tended to have the highest CT scores [median (range) 16 (16-22)]. Total serum IgE and the nasal subepithelial eosinophil counts correlated with the CT scores during the cold (rs = 0.38, P = 0.008 and rs = 0.46, P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with allergic IgE-mediated rhinitis had more severe paranasal sinus changes in CT scans than nonallergic subjects during viral colds. These changes indicate impaired sinus functioning and may increase the risk of bacterial sinusitis.  相似文献   
125.
126.
127.
The mechanisms of virus-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma and allergy and the failure of host defence in patients suffering from secondary airway infections are still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence of allergic rhinitis or susceptibility to recurrent sinusitis affects the structural and cellular changes in nasal mucosa during natural colds and convalescence. We compared the mucosal changes in biopsy samples during acute natural colds (days 2-4 of illness) and convalescence (3 weeks later) in patients with allergic rhinitis (n = 9), patients with susceptibility to sinusitis (n = 19) and healthy controls (n = 20). We saw similarly increased numbers of mucosal T and B lymphocytes and mast cells and increased vascular density during the acute colds compared to convalescence in all the three groups. The allergic subjects had elevated levels of eosinophils in the acute phase (P = 0.03), and the allergic and sinusitis-prone subjects had elevated levels of epithelial T cells (P = 0.04) and low levels of mast cells (P = 0.005) in convalescence compared to the control group. The sinusitis-prone subjects lacked intraepithelial cytotoxic cells in convalescence. In the allergic subjects, the reticular basement membrane was thicker in the acute phase compared to the convalescence (P = 0.05). These results suggest that various cells of the airways, including inflammatory and structural cells, are involved during viral respiratory infections in subjects with allergic rhinitis. The small numbers of mast cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes in the sinusitis-prone subjects may be related to their susceptibility to bacterial complications.  相似文献   
128.
The effects of protein synthesis inhibitors on short-term sensitization of a defensive reaction in common snails and the potentiation of the cholinosensitivity of command neurons were studied. The protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin did not prevent behavioral sensitization. Anisomycin and the irreversible protein synthesis inhibitor saporin changed the dynamics of potentiation of command neuron cholinosensitivity. We suggest that the sensitization of the defensive response of the common snail studied here does not require the synthesis of new proteins. __________ Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 355–362, May–June, 2006.  相似文献   
129.
The production of TNF-α and IFN-α cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclears in response to stimulation by TLR2/6, TLR4, TLR5, TLR9 ligands (zymosan, LPS, flagellin, and CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide, respectively) was studied in donors and patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Individual characteristics of TNF-α production by mononuclears were revealed in donors. Reduced stimulated production of TNF-α in response to stimulation with TLR4 and TLR5 ligands in vitro was detected in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. __________ Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 144, No. 7, pp. 68–71, July, 2007  相似文献   
130.
目的为腓总神经卡压综合征的诊断和治疗提供解剖学资料。方法在50具成人尸体标本上对腓总神经的走行及分支位置等进行了观察和测量。结果腓总神经从坐骨神经分出至小腿之前,走行在致密的胭窝外侧沟和腓管内。胭窝外侧沟的长度为82.5±2.3mm。在腓管内,神经与腓骨颈处的骨膜紧紧相贴,腓管的长度为26.5±1.5mm,腓总神经在腓管内的长度为23.5±1.7mm。腓总神经分为腓浅神经和腓深神经位置,在进入腓管之前者占42%,在腓管内者占58%。结论致密的胭窝外侧沟,以及腓总神经在狭窄的腓管内与腓骨颈处的骨膜紧密相贴,是腓总神经容易受卡压的两处解剖学位置。  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号