高中生应对方式及其与学业成绩的关系

目的:探讨高中生面对挫折和烦恼时应对方式的特点及其与学业成绩的关系。方法:以中学生应对方式评定问卷对649名高中生进行了调查。结果:女生比男生更倾向于采用发泄(因子均分2.4±0.7/2.7±0.7,F=23.32,P<0.01)和忍耐(3.2±0.7/3.0±0.8,F=5.08,P<0.05),而男生更倾向于采用幻想(2.4±0.9/2.1±0.8, F=15.52,P<0.01);重点中学比普通中学的高中生更多采用问题解决(3.3±0.6/3.1±0.7,F=20.85,P<0.011幻想(2.4±0.9/2.1±0.9,F=12.87,P<0.01)、退避(2.9±0.6/2.8±0.6,F=7.04,P<0.01)应对;来自城市和农村的高中生应对方式差异不显著;和睦安宁家庭气氛中的高中生采用问题解决应对显著多于偶尔争吵和经常争吵家庭中的高中生;民主型教养方式下的高中生比放任型教养方式的学生更多采用问题解决应对,权威型教养方式家庭中的高中生比民主型教养方式家庭中的高中生更多采用幻想应对。结论:高中生的应对方式存在性别差异。不同家庭气氛和不同教养方式以及学生在学业上的地位对应对方式也有一定影响,但城乡差别不明显。     

Digital peer‐to‐peer information seeking and sharing: Opportunities for education and collaboration in newborn screening

Parents use the internet to connect with their peers and access information about a multitude of health topics, including newborn screening (NBS). As the NBS system evolves, education about NBS must be evaluated and updated to remain accessible and beneficial to parents. In this article, we aim to describe parents' current NBS educational needs and highlight areas to improve newborn screening education by detailing an analysis of NBS posts on an online parenting discussion platform. We analyzed a total of 317 discussion posts on BabyCenter®, finding that parents had questions about and desired support around many aspects of NBS including processes, results, and follow‐up. As a result of this analysis, three recommendations to improve NBS education were developed. Through collaboration and by leveraging technology, we can provide parents with accessible, timely, and desired NBS informational and social support.     

Neuropsychological Deficit and Academic Performance in Children and Adolescents Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Evaluated the utility of neuropsychological testing in predictingacademic outcome in children 1 year following traumatic braininjury (TBI). Fifty-one schoolage children who were admittedto hospital after TBI were assessed with a battery of neuropsychologicalmeasures at 3 months postinjury. Academic achievement was assessedat 3 and 12 months postinjury. The neuropsychological batteryincluded intelligence testing and measures of memory, learning,and speed of information processing. Academic outcome was assessedin terms of post-TBI changes in reading, spelling, and arithmetic;changes in teacher ratings of school performance; and changein school placement. According to logistic regression analysis,change in placement from regular to special education at 1-yearpost-TBI was predicted by injury severity and by neuropsychologicalperformance at 3 months post-TBI. Findings suggest that neuropsychologicaltesting is useful in identifying children with special educationalneeds subsequent to TBI.     

Problematic Methods in the Assessment of Scholarly Productivity in Clinical PhD Programs

We review the methods in the ranking of clinical psychology doctoral programs provided by Stewart, Roberts, and Roy (2007). Using our own program as an example, we identify several areas of concern (e.g., authorship credits, criteria applied, faculty attrition). The inaccuracies identified for our program ranking, in combination with methodological concerns highlighted by previous commentaries, suggest that the validity of the rankings can be called into question.     

我国科技学术期刊编委会运行机制优化指标体系构建

【目的】 提出期刊出版界、科技界和期刊评价方普遍认同的编委会运行机制优化指标体系,为期刊编委会创建、换届或优化提供参考。【方法】 采用德尔菲法和层次分析法,构建我国科技学术期刊编委会运行机制优化指标体系,并确定权重。【结果】 构建由 “编委会组织优化指标体系(宏观)”和 “编委办刊贡献考核指标体系(微观)”组成的“我国科技学术期刊编委会运行机制优化指标体系”。【结论】 本研究集期刊出版界、科技界和期刊评价方的智慧,构建了“我国科技学术期刊编委会运行机制优化指标体系”,将宏观层面优化和微观层面考核相结合,为我国科技学术期刊编委会创建、换届或优化提供指南或参考,以期真正实现我国科技学术期刊的“专家办刊”,进而推动我国科技学术期刊的高质量发展。     

Universal School Meals and Associations with Student Participation,Attendance, Academic Performance,Diet Quality,Food Security,and Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review

The school environment plays an important role in children’s diets and overall health, and policies for universal free school meals have the potential to contribute to positive child health outcomes. This systematic review evaluates studies examining the association between universal free school meals and students’ school meal participation rates, diets, attendance, academic performance, and Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as school finances. The search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search for studies published in economically developed countries published through December 2020 was performed in PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science, and Academic Search Ultimate, followed by examining the references in the resultant literature. A total of 47 studies were identified and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to assess bias. Nearly all studies examining universal free school meals found positive associations with school meal participation. Most studies examining universal free school meals that included free lunch found positive associations with diet quality, food security, and academic performance; however, the findings of studies examining only universal free breakfast were mixed. Research findings were similarly mixed when examining attendance as an outcome. Concerns about adverse outcomes on student BMI were not supported by the literature; in fact, several studies detected a potentially protective effect of universal free school meals on BMI. Research examining the impact of universal free meals on school finances was limited, but suggest that lower-income school districts in the U.S. may have positive financial outcomes from participation in universal free school meal provisions. Additionally, providing free meals to students may be associated with improved household incomes, particularly among lower-income families with children. Further research is needed to examine the financial implications of universal free meals for both school districts and families. Overall, universal free school meals may have multiple benefits for students and countries should consider universal free school meal provisions with strong nutrition guidelines. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020221782).     

病例讨论式教学在脑血管病教学中应用方法与效果分析

目的分析病例讨论式教学在脑血管病教学中的应用方法与效果。方法选择30名到该院进行脑血管病学习的实习生作为该次研究主体,2017年9月—2018年6月间实习生15名设置对比组采取传统教学法带教,2018年9月—2019年6月间实习生15名设置研究组应用病例讨论式教学法带教,分析具体带教方法,评价实际带教效果。结果研究组理论知识(92.51±4.69)分、实践技能(92.23±4.55)分以及临床处理能力(92.41±4.35)分均高于对比组的(85.23±4.58)分、(85.11±3.42)分、(85.02±3.77)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);带教前,两组知识掌握、沟通技巧、临床思维、知识转化等综合能力评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),带教后,研究组各项综合能力评分均高于对比组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对脑血管病的实习带教,应用病例讨论式教学法,可显著提升可显著提升教学效果、实习生综合能力,病例讨论式教学法既为脑血管病教学提供了新的方向、思路,也为实习生未来职业生涯奠定了良好基础,因此,该带教模式可作为推荐在脑血管病教学中广泛应用。     

人工智能辅助学术同行评议的应用及分类

【目的】 分析人工智能(Artificial Intelligence, AI)作为辅助工具在学术同行评议中的创新应用,提出未来发展建议。【方法】 首先通过文献调研法和案例分析法,比较国内外AI辅助学术同行评议的应用实践;其次按功能对其进行分类,并阐述其主要支撑算法;最后展望AI在学术同行评议领域的未来发展方向。【结果】 国内方面,AI推荐审稿人功能被应用于基金评审,但AI学术影响力预测功能尚停留在研发阶段;国外方面,除学术不端检测功能外,其他功能的应用均处于起步阶段。按功能不同,AI辅助同行评议可分为投稿审查、审稿人推荐和学术影响力预测3类。其未来发展方向为:评议流程和文本结构的标准化、智能算法的通用化、评议专家库和已发表学术论文数据库的集成化;最终AI将发挥评议主体功能。【结论】 科研机构与学术期刊应积极参与全文文献数据库与全球审稿人数据库等相关数字基础设施建设,加快AI在学术同行评议中的应用,进一步推进该领域的数字化和智能化。     

加强临床病理讨论课提高病理教学质量

为激发学生学习病理课的积极性,改善病理学教学效果,我们开展了基于临床实际病例的临床病理讨论课。通过讨论并分析疾病的临床特征与病理学改变之间的联系,学生能更有效地掌握病理学知识,同时学生的综合分析能力也得到了提高。     

丝素蛋白用于生物材料的研究进展

阐述了丝素蛋白用于固定化酶载体、生物酶防护剂、生物传感器、药物缓释载体、功能性细胞培养基质、抗血凝物质、人工器官等生物材料的研究进展。丝素蛋白在生物材料方面有非常广阔的应用前景。