Evolution of hepatic fibrosis research

Molecular analysis of hepatic fibrogenesis has progressed with respect to both fibrosis progression and regression by using cell biological, molecular biological and (epi)genetic approaches. Recent researches have revealed sources of collagen‐producing cells other than hepatic stellate cells in the liver, and the involvement of the innate immune system and oxidative stress in the fibrotic process has attracted new attention. Together with these advancements in basic knowledge on the cellular and molecular biology of hepatic fibrosis, clinical researches have linked the clarification of the relationship between progression of the fibrosis stage and therapeutic efficacy for chronic viral hepatitis and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and validation of the regression of advanced fibrosis, even cirrhosis, of appropriate therapies using modern medicines. Furthermore, non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis using an ultrasound‐based modality has become a focus in the clinical diagnosis of liver fibrosis instead of liver biopsy. Taken together, liver fibrosis research has been evolving both basically and clinically in the past three decades.     

Bidirectional Ultrasound Elastographic Imaging Framework for Non-invasive Assessment of the Non-linear Behavior of a Physiologically Pressurized Artery

Studies of non-destructive bidirectional ultrasound assessment of non-linear mechanical behavior of the artery are scarce in the literature. We hereby propose derivation of a strain–shear modulus relationship as a new graphical diagnostic index using an ultrasound elastographic imaging framework, which encompasses our in-house bidirectional vascular guided wave imaging (VGWI) and ultrasound strain imaging (USI). This framework is used to assess arterial non-linearity in two orthogonal (i.e., longitudinal and circumferential) directions in the absence of non-invasive pressure measurement. Bidirectional VGWI estimates longitudinal (μ_L) and transverse (μ_T) shear moduli, whereas USI estimates radial strain (?_r). Vessel-mimicking phantoms (with and without longitudinal pre-stretch) and in vitro porcine aortas under static and/or dynamic physiologic intraluminal pressure loads were examined. ?_r was found to be a suitable alternative to intraluminal pressure for representation of cyclic loading on the artery wall. Results revealed that μ_T values of all samples examined increased non-linearly with ε_r magnitude and more drastically than μ_L, whereas μ_L values of only the pre-stretched phantoms and aortas increased with ?_r magnitude. As a new graphical representation of arterial non-linearity and function, strain–shear modulus loops derived by the proposed framework over two consecutive dynamic loading cycles differentiated sample pre-conditions and corroborated direction-dependent non-linear mechanical behaviors of the aorta with high estimation repeatability.     

Do regions of interest location and type influence liver stiffness measurement using magnetic resonance elastography?

PurposeTo assess the variability of liver stiffness measurements using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) at 1.5 T, depending on different approaches of regions of interest (ROIs) drawing.Material and methodsFifty consecutive patients with successful liver MRE were included. There were 32 men and 18 women with a mean age of 52 ± 14 (SD) years (range: 20–85 years). MRE was acquired using a gradient recalled-echo MRE sequence. At the level of the portal bifurcation, one observer drawn in the right liver first 3 elliptical ROI and then one free-hand ROI, as large as possible based on the confidence map and the anatomy. Three additional elliptical ROIs were further drawn on the slice above and 3 other on the slice below, for a total of 9 elliptical ROIs. The average value of liver stiffness in the 3 elliptical ROIs of the central slice and the one from the 9 elliptical ROIs were computed. Three liver stiffness values were obtained for each patient from the 3 measurement methods (one free-hand ROI, 3 elliptical ROIs and 9 elliptical ROIs). Inter-method variability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsThe variability between the 3 methods was excellent with ICC > 0.978 (P < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed high agreement between the 3 methods with bias < 0.45 kPa and limits of agreement < ±1.13 kPa. The variability was lower when comparing a large free-hand ROI and the 3-elliptical ROIs, than when comparing the 9-elliptical ROIs to one of the other methods.ConclusionOur results show that the variability between the 3 methods of ROI drawing and placement is very low.