We reported a case of abscess in which Serratia marcescens was isolated as the causative organism. We measured the postantibiotic effect (PAE) of dibekacin (DKB) and gentamicin (GM) against S. marcescens and studied the relationship between the clinical effect and the PAE. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of DKB against S. marcescens was 6.25 μg/mL and the serum concentration 30 min after infusion of 100 mg DKB was 5.99 μg/mL. The abscess was cured by the administration of DKB every 12 h. The PAE in vivo was 2.5, 2.9 and 3.3 h when DKB was administered at 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively. This PAE is one of the reasons that infection can be effectively treated with intermittent administration, even if the serum concentration is below the MIC. 相似文献
PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) performed to treat gross hematuria secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and MethodsBetween February 2014 and December 2017, 20 patients with gross hematuria secondary to BPH refractory to medical treatment underwent PAE in our institution. Technical success was defined as bilateral PAE. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and clinical review were assessed before PAE and at 3 and 12 months after procedure. Short- and medium-term clinical successes were defined as resolution of gross hematuria with no recurrence at 3 and 12 months, respectively.ResultsTechnical success rate was 100%. No major adverse events were recorded. Minor complications included gluteal pain, nausea, and fever in 7 patients. At 3 months, there were improvements in IPSS (21.1 ± 6.6 to 9.8 ± 4.7, P < .001) and QoL (5.1 ± 1.7 to 2.4 ± 1.3, P < .001). At 12 months, there were improvements in IPSS (8.1 ± 2.5, P < .001) and QoL (2.1 ± 1.0, P < .001). At 3 months, recurrent hematuria was reported in 3 of 20 patients (85% short-term clinical success rate). One of the remaining 17 patients had developed recurrent hematuria by 12 months (80% medium-term clinical success rate).ConclusionsPAE is a safe and effective means of treating gross hematuria caused by BPH refractory to medical treatment. PAE offers a reasonable option for such patients who are not suitable for surgical therapy. 相似文献
To evaluate efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization (PAE) in urinary catheter–dependent patients with large prostate volumes and high comorbidity scores.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective single-center review was conducted of 30 patients with urinary retention at time of PAE from November 2014 through February 2017. Mean (range) age was 73.1 years (48–94 y), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 (0–10), duration of urinary retention was 63.4 days (2–224 d), International Prostate Symptom Score quality-of-life (IPSS-QOL) was 5.3 (3–6), and prostate volume was 167.3 cm3 (55–557 cm3). These parameters were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months after PAE. Trials of voiding were performed approximately 2 weeks after PAE and, if failed, every 2 weeks thereafter. Adverse events were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Results
At a mean (range) of 18.2 days (1–72 d), 26 (86.7%) patients were no longer reliant on catheters. Follow-up was obtained in all patients eligible at 3 and 6 months and 17 of 20 (85.0%) patients eligible at 1 year. Mean (range) IPSS-QOL improved significantly to 1.2 (0–5), 0.7 (0–4), and 0.6 (0–4) at 3, 6, and 12 months (all P < .001). Mean (range) prostate volume decreased significantly to 115.9 cm3 (27–248 cm3) at 3 months (P < .001). Two patients experienced grade II urosepsis complications, which were successfully treated with intravenous antibiotics. All other complications were self-limited grade I complications.
Conclusions
PAE represents a safe and effective option for management of patients with urinary retention, especially patients with large prostates who are not ideal surgical candidates. 相似文献
To evaluate outcome of prostatic artery chemoembolization for patients with prostate cancer (PCa).
Materials and Methods
This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted between August 2013 and July 2016 in 20 patients with PCa who underwent chemoembolization. Mean patient age was 67.5 years ± 6.4. Gleason score was 6–10, and staging was T2N0M0. Fifteen patients refused prostatectomy and 5 wanted to stop hormonal therapy because of side effects. For chemoembolization, Chelidonium majus mother tincture 1 mL was slowly injected into the prostatic arteries. Docetaxel 1 mL and 150–300 μm Embosphere (Merit Medical Systems, Inc, South Jordan, Utah) microspheres 0.5 mL were thoroughly mixed, and the mixture was slowly injected by the same route. Embolization of prostatic arteries was finished with 150–300 μm Embosphere microspheres. Technical success was defined as bilateral prostatic artery embolization. Biochemical failure was defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) decrease to < 2 ng/mL followed by recurrence when PSA increased to > 2 ng/mL within 1 month after success.
Results
Technical success was 80.0% (16/20 patients). Biochemical failure was 18.7% (3/16 patients). There was 1 short-term biochemical recurrence at 4 months and 2 midterm recurrences (12–18 months). Biochemical success at 12–18 months was 62.5% (10/16 patients). Adverse events (31.3%) included a small area (2 cm2) of bladder wall ischemia, which was removed by surgery (n = 1); transient acute urinary retention (n = 1) and urinary urgency (n = 1) for 1 week; sexual dysfunction (n = 2), which completely recovered after 10 and 12 months, respectively.
Conclusions
Prostatic artery chemoembolization allowed a biochemical response in patients with localized PCa and is a promising treatment. 相似文献
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using the combination of 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles versus 100-μm PVA particles alone in the treatment of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Materials and Methods
Over a 5-year period, 120 patients treated with PAE for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH were randomized to undergo embolization with 50-μm plus 100-μm PVA particles (group A) or 100-μm PVA particles alone (group B). Mean follow-up time was 34 months (range, 12–57 mo). There were no differences between groups regarding baseline data. Primary outcome measurements included change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcome measurements included procedure-associated pain, prostate ischemia measured on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 1 week after PAE, and changes over time in quality of life (QOL) questionnaire, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR) volume, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were evaluated. Recurrence of LUTS following PAE was defined as relief of LUTS temporally but increased IPSS ≥ 8 or QOL score ≥ 3 or decrease in Qmax to < 7 mL/s.
Results
Mean follow-up periods were 35 months ± 22 in group A and 33 months ± 25 in group B (P = .629). No differences between groups regarding procedural details, pain scores, or adverse events were noted (P > .05). At 24 month of follow-up, patients in group A had a greater decrease in mean IPSS (18.7 ± 12.5 vs 14.8 ± 13.5), QOL score (3.7 ± 1.5 vs 2.4 ± 1.8), Qmax (10.5 mL ± 9.5 vs 6.8 mL ± 5.0), PVR (92.0 mL ± 75.0 vs 60.0 mL ± 55.0), and PV (37.0 mL ± 19.5 vs 25.5 mL ± 15.0) compared with patients in group B (P < .05 for all). Mean ratios of prostate ischemic volume at 1 week after PAE were 70% ± 20 in group A and 41% ± 25 in group B (P = .021); mean PSA levels at 24 hour after PAE were 92.5 ng/mL ± 55.0 in group A and 77.5 ng/mL ± 45.0 in group B (P = .031); LUTS recurrence rates were 3.6% in group A and 14.6% in group B (P = .024). The mean IIEF-5 was not significantly different from baseline in either group.
Conclusions
PAE with 50-μm plus 100-μm PVA particles resulted in greater improvement in clinical and imaging outcomes and no significant differences in adverse events compared with 100-μm PVA particles alone. 相似文献
Introduction: Tigecycline has emerged as first line therapy for serious systemic infections due to important pathogens (except P. aeruginosa and Proteus sp.), including multi-drug resistant (MDR) and Gram negative bacilli (GNB), including carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriae. Tigecycline has a ‘low resistance potential,’ is protective against C. difficile, and is often the only antibiotic effective against MDR GNB, e.g., Klebsiella sp.
Areas covered: Standard dose tigecycline therapy has been used for intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin/skin structure infections (cSSSIs), and CAP. Clinical experience with once daily high dose tigecycline (HDT), i.e., 200 – 400 mg (IV) x 1, then 100 – 200 mg (IV) q24 h, is reviewed. Optimal tigecycline efficacy is dependent on PK/PD based dosing. Suboptimal outcomes have been due to inappropriate use or suboptimal dosing.
Expert commentary: Tigecycline’s spectrum against nearly all important pathogens (including MSSA/MRSA, VSE/VRE, B. fragilis, C. difficile, MDR and GNB) assures tigecycline a critical place in the antibiotic armamentarium. Dosed optimally, HDT can be a cornerstone of antibiotic stewardship programs in preventing C. difficile, treating MDR GNB pathogens, and in preventing resistance. Properly used and optimally dosed, once daily HDT should be considered preferred therapy for severe systemic infections and those due to MDR GNB pathogens. 相似文献