Relationship between breastfeeding and asthma prevalence in young children exposed to adverse childhood experiences

Objective: To investigate if duration of supplemental breastfeeding is associated with a lower asthma risk and whether adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) early in life influence this relationship in children ages 3 to 5 years. Methods: Data were from the 2011–2012 National Survey of Children's Health, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate incident risk ratios (IRR) for lifetime and current asthma in young children aged 3 to 5 years (n = 15,642). We tested for effect measure modification using stratified analyses. Results: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months or supplemental breastfeeding for children ≥12 months significantly reduced the risk of lifetime asthma prevalence compared to never breastfed children (IRR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46–0.88, p = 0.007; and IRR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.99, p = 0.044, respectively), adjusted for covariates. In stratified analyses, breastfeeding reduced the risk of lifetime asthma for children who experienced 1 ACE but not for children who experienced 2 or more ACEs. Conclusion: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months, with and without supplementation, appears to prevent asthma or delay its onset. The protective effect of breastfeeding was attenuated among children who experienced more than 2 ACEs. The known harmful effects that ACEs have on children's health may outweigh the benefits of breastfeeding in reducing the risk of a child developing asthma. Understanding how specific time periods in a child's life may be most affected by exposure to early life adversities, along with the protective effect of breastfeeding against asthma, are important areas of further study.     

Experiences,considerations and emotions relating to cardiogenetic evaluation in relatives of young sudden cardiac death victims

Relatives of young sudden cardiac death (SCD) victims are at increased risk of carrying a potentially fatal inherited cardiac disease. Hence, it is recommended to perform an autopsy on the victim and to refer his or her relatives to a cardiogenetics clinic for a full evaluation to identify those at risk and allow preventive measures to be taken. However, at present, the number of families attending a cardiogenetics clinic after the SCD of a young relative is low in the Netherlands. We performed a qualitative study and report on the experiences and attitudes of first-degree relatives who attended a cardiogenetics clinic for evaluation. In total, we interviewed nine first-degree relatives and one spouse of seven SCD victims about their experiences, considerations and emotions before attendance and at the first stage of the cardiogenetic evaluation before DNA results were available. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed. Medical professionals did not have an important role in informing or referring relatives to a cardiogenetics clinic. Importantly, all participants indicated that they would have appreciated a more directive approach from medical professionals, because their mourning process hampered their own search for information and decision-making. A need to understand the cause of death and wanting to prevent another SCD event occurring in the family were the most important reasons for attending a clinic. There are possibilities to improve the information process and better support their decision-making. The multidisciplinary cardiogenetic evaluation was appreciated, but could be improved by minor changes in the way it is implemented.