纳武利尤单抗注射液致重症肌无力

1例53岁女性患者于肝内胆管癌术后20个月给予纳武利尤单抗注射液140 mg静脉滴注、1次/d,第1、20天。第2次应用该药后第3天,患者出现双下肢乏力;第14天乏力加重,出现视物模糊、上眼睑下垂、胸闷气促伴心悸;第24天出现胡言乱语,发展为呼之不应。给予气管插管机械通气及对症支持治疗后患者神志恢复。诊断为药源性重症肌无力危象,合并心力衰竭、呼吸衰竭。给予激素、人免疫球蛋白治疗19 d后,患者眼睑下垂、心悸症状明显好转,但呼吸衰竭无明显好转,无法脱机自主呼吸。     

Programmed Death 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Advanced and Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Single-Agent Studies

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the response rates of patients with treatment-refractory urothelial carcinoma treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. We reviewed the literature for prospective studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in refractory urothelial carcinoma patients, which formed the basis for US Food and Drug Administration approval of 5 different antagonistic antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab). We considered studies examining PD-1/PD-L1–treated patients, which we identified using the following key terms in the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies had ≥ 20 patients each and reported response rates, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). We performed fixed and random-effects meta-analyses to model the point estimates for objective response rate and complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for studies reporting these statistics were evaluated. We found 10 eligible studies that met our inclusion criteria, providing extractable numerators and denominators for response rates, PFS, and OS for 1934 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The objective response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval, 15-22) for second-line or later therapies. The random-effects estimate for complete response was 4% (95% confidence interval, 3-5), including all disease locations and all PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Median OS and PFS were < 13 months and 3 months, respectively, across all studies, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. We found that the estimated response rates of agents included in this meta-analysis seem to be more favorable than other salvage therapies.     

Healthcare resource utilization in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line therapy with dabrafenib + trametinib versus nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy

Objective: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) initiated on first-line (1L) combination therapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib (D?+?T; oral) and those initiated on 1?L monotherapy with the anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab (N/P; intravenous).

Methods: Patients with melanoma initiated on D?+?T or N/P from Q1/2014 to Q2/2016 (defined as 1?L treatment for MM) were identified in the Truven MarketScan database. Entropy balancing was used to reweight the N/P cohort in order to make it comparable to the D?+?T cohort with respect to the mean and variance of baseline covariates. HRU outcomes during 1?L therapy, reported per patient-year (PPY), were described and compared between the two cohorts post-weighting (i.e. independently of baseline covariates).

Results: Of the 445 patients included, 202 and 243 were initiated on D?+?T and N/P, respectively. After weighting, patients initiated on N/P had more outpatient visits for drug administration during 1?L therapy than those initiated on D?+?T (difference?=?18.6 visits PPY [95% CI?=?16.0–21.1]). Patients initiated on N/P also had more outpatient office visits for reasons other than drug administration (difference?=?8.1 visits PPY [95% CI?=?1.9–13.7]). No significant differences were observed for other HRU parameters (i.e. inpatient admissions, inpatient days, and emergency department visits during 1?L therapy).

Conclusions: HRU during 1?L therapy was generally similar between patients initiated on D?+?T and N/P. Nonetheless, patients initiated on N/P had more outpatient visits, including more outpatient visits for reasons unrelated to drug administration.     

Melanoma en pacientes receptores de un trasplante de órgano sólido

In this review, we analyze the 3 clinical scenarios related to the development of melanoma in solid organ transplant recipients: melanoma in patients with a history of the tumor prior to a transplant, de novo melanoma following a transplant, and melanoma of donor origin. The main factors to consider in organ-transplant candidates with a history of melanoma are tumor stage, presence or absence of residual disease, and time from diagnosis to transplantation. Solid organ transplant recipients have a greater risk of melanoma than immunocompetent individuals. Mortality is also higher in this population, especially in patients with advanced melanoma, as treatment is especially challenging. Clinical history and physical examination provide the most useful information for preventing donor-to-recipient transmission of melanoma. Donor-derived melanoma has a very poor prognosis.     

PD-1抑制剂用于肝癌肝移植术前治疗的安全性探讨

目的  探讨程序性细胞死亡蛋白1（PD-1）抑制剂用于原发性肝癌（肝癌）肝移植术前治疗的安全性。 方法  回顾性分析7例术前应用PD-1抑制剂的肝癌肝移植受者的临床资料,总结受者免疫相关不良反应（irAE）发生情况及预后情况,评估PD-1抑制剂在肝癌肝移植受者中使用的安全性。 结果  7例肝癌肝移植受者术前使用PD-1抑制剂,使用疗程为1~20个,自停药至手术间隔时间为6~120 d。5例受者发生不同程度的irAE,其中疲乏3例、发热2例、脱发2例、皮疹2例、腹泻1例、恶心1例、心肌炎1例,多数irAE毒性分级为G1~2级,1例发生G5级毒性反应（致死性心肌炎）,并导致受者死亡。1例受者于术后7 d发生排斥反应,经糖皮质激素冲击治疗及增加他克莫司剂量后好转。 结论  PD-1抑制剂可用于肝癌肝移植术前治疗,但应密切注意其irAE及术后排斥反应的发生。     

Programmed Cell Death-One Inhibition Therapy in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

The majority of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) may be cured, but for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) cHL, the prognosis is unfavorable. Immune dysfunction is a significant contributor of relapse and a hallmark of cHL; in particular, the immune system is unable to eradicate lymphoma cells that overexpress immune checkpoint proteins. The blocking of this mechanism used by lymphoma cells to evade the immune system has resulted in clinical benefits. Use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in R/R cHL is associated with high response rates and an acceptable adverse effects profile. There is growing interest in combining chemotherapy with CPIs in frontline therapy of cHL treatment to improve relapse rates without significant additive toxicity. In this review, we discuss the current evidence supporting CPI use in R/R cHL and maintenance therapy. We present emerging CPI data in frontline adult cHL and assess its role in the elderly. In addition, we discuss critical immune-related toxicities and their management, and elaborate on the challenges of monitoring response and minimal residual disease as tools for maximizing efficacy by limiting toxicity.     

Ramucirumab for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: On 12 December 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ramucirumab for use in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Areas covered: This review discusses the best treatment strategy for ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Expert opinion: The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy confers a 1.4-month improvement in overall survival, with an acceptable toxicity profile. The potential impact of the approval of the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody nivolumab or pembrolizumab on the use of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC patient population is uncertain in clinical practice. In order to improve overall outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC, both ramucirumab plus docetaxel and the PD-1-blocking antibody should be used in any treatment line.