mPEG表面修饰的PLGA嵌段共聚物的血液相容性评价

本实验室设计合成了三种不同LA／GA比例的mPEG修饰PLGA（PELGA，含15％mPEG），为了评价它们的血液相容性，我们以硅化玻璃试管为阴性对照，未硅化的试管为阳性对照，参照国际标准（ISO10993）和《中华人民共和国国家标准GB／T16886医疗器械生物学评价》方法进行了体外评价实验。试验包括溶血率实验，血小板黏附实验，动态凝血时间实验，凝血时间实验，血浆复钙时间实验和凝血酶原时间实验等综合评价指标。结果表明，合成材料具有优良的血液相容性，材料制成的纳米粒有望应用于静脉注射。     

Synergistic convergence of microbiota-specific systemic IgG and secretory IgA

1. Download high-res image (170KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Desensitization protocols improving access and outcome in transplantation

Sensitization to antigens of the HLA and ABO system has been the biggest barrier to access in renal transplantation and, increasingly, in transplantation of other organs. Additionally, antibody to donor antigens has been shown to result in injury to the graft ranging from catastrophic, irreversible hyperacute rejection to the slower, more insidious, chronic form of rejection. The problem of access has been recognized globally and has been the incentive for measures to overcome the disadvantage experienced by the sensitized patient. However, early attempts to reduce sensitization achieved only transient success. Newer immunosuppressive agents that affect B-cell function or viability have permitted the development of treatment protocols to eliminate and, potentially, downregulate donor-specific antibodies. The use of these protocols has achieved successful transplants that were HLA and/or ABO incompatible prior to treatment and, as such, has provided some patients with their only opportunity for transplantation.     

引导管芯在更换经口气管导管的应用

目的 观察应用引导管芯做引导，更换经口气管内导管的临床效果。方法 随机选择26例已完成气管内插管的病人，将引导管芯插入气管导管内至隆突水平，并拔出气管导管；将欲更换的气管导管套在引导管芯外，在管芯引导下将气管导管插入气管内，完成换置；结果 全部病例均顺利完成更换导管，换管过程中病人氧合良好，术后未发生与更换导管相关并发症；结论 应用引导管芯更换气管内导管，方法安全，简便易行，可替代传统换管方法。     

一例促皮质素静脉外渗至局部皮肤坏死的案例解析与改进

对1例癫痫性痉挛患儿采用促皮质素静脉给药时发生静脉外渗至局部皮肤坏死的案例进行解析。针对事件发生原因,制定并采取措施:静脉穿刺难度事前评估,优化临床监护,加强相关知识培训,以肌肉注射代替静脉滴注等,避免了此类事件的再次发生,提升了临床合理用药水平,确保了患者安全。     

房室结慢径路消融——有效放电过程的心电监测

【目的】探讨房室结慢径路消融有效放电过程心电监测的意义。【方法】58例慢-快型房室结折返性心动过速在有效靶点以低射频能量(15～25W)放电,监测心电变化,出现①交界区心律>150min     

Is the placement of jejunostomy tubes in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy associated with increased inpatient healthcare utilization? An analysis of the National Readmissions Database

BackgroundPatients undergoing esophagectomy often receive jejunostomy tubes (j-tubes) for nutritional supplementation. We hypothesized that j-tubes are associated with increased post-esophagectomy readmissions.Study designWe identified esophagectomies for malignancy with (EWJ) or without (EWOJ) j-tubes using the 2010–2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Outcomes include readmission, inpatient mortality, and complications. Outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsOf 22,429 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 16,829 (75.0%) received j-tubes. Patients were similar in age and gender but EWJ were more likely to receive chemotherapy (24.2% vs. 15.1%, p < 0.01). EWJ was associated with decreased 180-day inpatient mortality (HR 0.72 [0.52–0.99]) but not with higher readmissions at 30- (15.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.16; HR 0.9 [0.77–1.05]) or 180 days (25.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.37; HR 0.94 [0.79–1.10]) or increased complications (p = 0.37). These results were confirmed in the PSM cohort.ConclusionJ-tubes placed in the setting of esophagectomy do not increase inpatient readmissions or mortality.     

Stone extraction with loop ureteral catheter versus ureteroscopy in small distal ureteral stones—retrospective comparison of 547 consecutive patients

BackgroundTo evaluate whether stone extraction with a loop ureteral catheter (LUC) in distal ureteral stones is associated with a higher frequency of ureteral strictures compared to treatment with primary ureteroscopic stone removal (p-URS) or ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (l-URS).MethodsFive hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients were primarily endourologically treated for distal ureteral stones in our department between 2005 and 2019 and included in the study protocol. Data was retrospectively obtained from the patients’ charts and medical reports as well as from office-based urologists. Data analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney test or Student’s t-test as appropriate. A level of P<0.05 was assigned statistical significance.ResultsFour hundred and twelve patients were treated by URS (p-URS n=304, l-URS n=108) and another 135 by LUC stone extraction. Median follow-up was 41 [2–159] months. There was no difference between the groups concerning age, gender, proportion of patients with ureteral stenting, operating time, hospitalization or readmission rates. The number of ureteric strictures was small in all procedures [n=3 (1.0%) in p-URS, n=2 (1.9%) in l-URS and n=2 (1.5%) in LUC] and there was no difference between the groups concerning this serious complication (p-URS vs. LUC: P=0.6465; l-URS vs. LUC: P=0.9999).ConclusionsIn small distal stones, LUC stone extraction still is an alternative to URS procedures in stone management with comparable results concerning postinterventional ureteral strictures. In experienced hands, it still has its value in accurately selected patients.     

Experience sharing of conservative treatment after a 90-year-old male replacing the suprapubic bladder catheter enters the small intestine: A rare case report

IntroductionThe treatment of intestinal perforation caused by the SBC enters the small intestine in elderly patients is a challenge for urologists. The report is to share our experience of conservative treatment after a 90-year-old male with the suprapubic bladder catheter enters the small intestine.Presentation of caseBecause of the device was obstructed, a 90-year-old male went to our hospital with his family and requested to replace the SBC. When the fistula tube was replaced, it entered the intestine through the intestinal injury site instead of entering the bladder. During the hospitalization, the patient was given supportive treatments and the SBC was dynamically monitored daily and it was intermittently withdrawn out during this period. After the drainage volume was less than 10 mL for three consecutive days and the intestinal fistula was healing gradually, the catheter was taken out.DiscussionAccording to our experience, the common complications in the process include failure to pull out the SBC, abnormal position of the SBC, and poor drainage of the SBC. However, the drainage tube placing into the small intestine through the original hole of the suprapubic bladder fistula during the replacement process is quite rare. When elderly patients have traumatic small bowel perforation, the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal perforation in elderly patients was particularly important.ConclusionThe conservative treatment of intestinal perforation is suitable for elderly patients who are unsuitable or unwilling to undergo a surgical operation. Of course, it should be in accordance with the patient's condition to make the right choice of treatment.