To study the association between anxiety and neurocardiogenic syncope as determined by head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in men and women with presyncope or syncope, patients with unexplained syncope or presyncope undergoing HUT were asked to complete the Burns Anxiety Inventory (BAI), a validated inventory of 33 questions with responses graded from 0 to 3. HUT consisted of a 30-minute tilt to 60 degrees, which if negative, was repeated with an isoproterenol infusion. A positive HUT was defined as symptomatic hypotension and/or bradycardia. Of the 66 patients who completed the BAI and underwent HUT, 33 were men and 33 were women. The mean age was 57 +/- 18 years (17-91 years). Patients with a positive HUT had a higher BAI score than those with a negative HUT (22 +/- 12 vs 14 +/- 13, P = 0.017). This association was stronger in women with a BAI score of 24 +/- 11 in those with a positive HUT versus 13 +/- 8 in those with a negative HUT (P = 0.005). In contrast, the mean BAI score for men with a positive HUT was 19 +/- 13, as compared to 15 +/- 16 for a negative HUT (P = 0.5). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates a statistical association between anxiety (as determined by BAI) and HUT result. Gender-based analysis revealed a more statistically significant relationship between anxiety and HUT outcome for women as compared to men. 相似文献
BackgroundLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads patients to adapt their posture and walking parameters. Pelvic retroversion might be a compensation mechanism of pain. Pelvic and lower limbs compensations during gait are still not precisely understood, as well as the effect of a surgical decompression on them. These dynamic parameters can be studied through three-dimensional gait analysis.Research questionIs the dynamic pelvic tilt modified after decompression surgery in LSS patients compared to asymptomatic subjects?Material and methods50 asymptomatic subjects (C-group) and 37 patients operated on for lumbar decompression underwent a three-dimensional gait analysis one month before (M0) and six months after (M6) the surgery. 3D gait analysis was performed and hip and knee flexion, trunk kinematics, walking speed, stride length and pelvic tilt during gait or dynamic pelvic tilt (dPT) were recorded. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogic Scales (VAS)) and radiological assessment were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.ResultsMean values of maximum and minimum dPT in the LSS-group preoperatively were significantly higher compared to the C-group (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 7.3 (5.6)°, p = 0.003; 7.7 (6.1)° versus 4.8 (5.8)°, p = 0.011), and were significantly lowered at M6 (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 8.1 (4.8)°, p = 0.0087; and 7.7 (6.1)° versus 5.1 (4.7)°, p = 0.012), and became similar to the C-group. The dPT range of motion at M0 and M6 were similar, and were both significantly higher than control values. Mean values of maximum and minimum hip flexion were significantly higher at M0 compared to the C-group, and were significantly lowered at M6. No difference was found between the pre- and postoperative radiographic pelvic tilt. The VAS for lumbar pain, the VAS for radicular pain and the ODI were significantly decreased at M6.SignificanceCompared to asymptomatic people, LSS patients walked with a pelvic anteversion, a hip flessum and a knee flessum before surgery, which tended to disappear after the surgical decompression. These differences were not noticed on static radiographs. 相似文献
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and tolerability of shortened, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-potentiated, head-up tilt test (HUT) in patients older and younger than 65 with unexplained syncope and to compare the specificity of GTN-potentiated HUT (GTN-HUT) in older and younger controls. DESIGN: Methodological study. SETTING: Syncope units in secondary and tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with unexplained syncope (100 aged > or =65 (mean age +/- standard deviation 73 +/- 6; 35 men) and 224 aged <65 (41 +/- 15; 111 men)) and 64 controls (29 aged > or =65 (73 +/- 6; 13 men) and 35 aged <65 (42 +/- 13; 16 men)). INTERVENTION: Patients and controls were tilted upright to 60 degrees for 20 minutes. If syncope did not occur, sublingual GTN (400 microg) was administered and 60 degrees HUT was continued for 15 minutes. Responses were classified as positive, negative, or exaggerated (slow decrease in blood pressure with a slight decrease in heart rate after GTN). MEASUREMENTS: Electrocardiogram and arterial pressure were monitored continuously. RESULTS: GTN-HUT was positive in 60% and 66% (NS), negative in 29% and 33% (NS), and exaggerated in 11% and 1% (P <.001) of older and younger patients, respectively. In older and younger controls, the GTN-HUT was negative in 70% and 86% and exaggerated in 28% and 9% of cases, respectively, (P <.05). The overall specificity (considering as negative also the exaggerated responses) was 97% in older and 94% in younger subjects. No patient or control experienced serious side effects. CONCLUSION: The shortened GTN-HUT provides satisfactory positivity rate and specificity in older patients. This test may be considered as a diagnostic tool in assessing recurrent unexplained syncope in older patients. 相似文献
Purpose: A power tilt wheelchair allows independence in changing body position to address a variety of needs throughout the day; however, literature and clinical practice suggest that actual use varies greatly. This grounded theory study examined how power tilt was used in daily life from the perspectives of adults who used power tilt and therapists who prescribed this technology.
Methods: A constant comparative approach was used to collect and analyze interview data from five people who use power tilt and six therapists who prescribe this technology.
Results: This paper presents the findings specific to understanding the reasons why power tilt was used, focusing on the relationships between tilt use and (1) the reasons for use, (2) the reasons for prescribing power tilt and (3) the associated amplitudes of tilt.
Conclusions: This study advances knowledge related to how power tilt is used in daily life by elucidating that how the reasons for use are conceptualized is complex. The three relationships related to the reason for power tilt use identified in this paper have the potential to influence the quality of communication about power tilt use in clinical practice between therapist and client and in research between researcher and participant.
Implications for Rehabilitation:
Understanding the inconsistencies and variations in how power tilt is used in daily life is dependent on exploring the reasons beyond the words or terms expressed to describe use.
Reasons for tilt use are context dependent, particularly the activity occurring at the time of tilt use, the associated amplitude of tilt and the influence of other reasons occurring at the same time.