Introduction: Approximately 10–15% of bile duct stones cannot be treated using conventional stone removal techniques. For difficult common bile duct stones (CBDS), various endoscopic techniques have been developed. This review covers technical tips and endoscopic treatments including Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), particularly under Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance.
Areas covered: Literatures about endoscopic treatment for bile duct stone were searched in Pub Med. As novel methods, EUS-guided approaches have also been reported, although long-term results and prospective evaluation are not yet sufficient. Large stones may need fragmentation prior to removal, to prevent stone impaction. To perform fragmentation, mechanical lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy techniques are available.
Expert commentary: Despite the fact that most bile duct stones can be treated using endoscopic techniques, endoscopists should remind to be able to select the temporary biliary stenting or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage as an option. 相似文献
Background:Common bile duct stone (CBDS) is typically manifested with abdominal pain, chills, fever, and jaundice. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) are currently the main minimally invasive methods for the treatment of CBDS. However, there are few studies about the differences of medium and long-term complication after EST or LTCBDE. Therefore, we will conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review to systematically evaluate the difference of medium and long-term complications between EST and LTCBDE against CBDS.Methods:Randomized controlled trials of EST or LTCBDE against CBDS will be searched in several English and Chinese databases with the following vocabularies: “laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration,” “endoscopic sphincterotomy,” “choledocholithiasis,” “common bile duct stone” until December, 2020. Two reviewers will independently conduct the literature extraction, risk of bias assessment, and statistical analysis.Results and Conclusions:The study will help to systematically evaluate the difference of medium and long-term complication between EST and LTCBDE against CBDS.OSF Registration number:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/5U7SA. 相似文献
We present a case of preoperatively diagnosed gallbladder torsion (GT) that was successfully treated by single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An 80‐year‐old woman presented with sudden pain and a palpable mass in the right upper quadrant. Contrast‐enhanced CT revealed ischemic changes, a swollen gallbladder with a V‐shaped distortion of the extrahepatic ducts, and the gallbladder in an abnormal anatomical position; clinical findings indicated GT. We performed single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperatively found that the floating gallbladder was twisted counterclockwise by 180° around the cystic duct. After an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a GT was first performed in 1994, and since then, 28 cases, including ours, have been treated laparoscopically. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for GT could be the standard treatment for this condition, and single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be a good surgical option for patients with GT because of its anatomical characteristics. 相似文献
Urolithiasis is a common condition in the U.S. Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for care, including analgesia and treatments to facilitate stone passage.
Objective
With the new evidence concerning the evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis, this review summarizes current literature regarding the ED management of urolithiasis.
Discussion
Urolithiasis occurs primarily through supersaturation of urine and commonly presents with flank pain, hematuria, and nausea/vomiting. History, examination, and assessment with several laboratory tests are cornerstones of evaluation. Urinalysis is not diagnostic, but it may be used in association with other assessments. Risk assessment tools and advanced imaging can assist with diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard. Newer low-dose CT imaging may reduce radiation. Recent studies support ultrasound as an alternate diagnostic modality, especially in pediatric and pregnant patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain first-line therapy, with opioids or intravenous lidocaine reserved for refractory pain. Tamsulosin can increase passage in larger stones but has not demonstrated benefit in smaller stones. Nifedipine and intravenous fluids are not recommended to facilitate passage. Surgical intervention is based upon stone size, duration, and modifying factors. Patients who are discharged should be advised on dietary changes.
Conclusion
Urolithiasis is a common disease increasing in prevalence with the potential for significant morbidity. Focused evaluation with history, examination, and testing is important in diagnosis and management. Understanding the clinical features, risk assessment tools, imaging options, and treatment options can assist emergency physicians in the management of urolithiasis. 相似文献
Backgrounds/ObjectivesPatients with chronic pancreatitis may develop pancreatic duct stones that can obstruct outflow leading to ductal hypertension and pain. Both endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) with per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) and intraductal lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) are feasible options to attempt ductal stone clearance. This study aims to compare POP-guided lithotripsy with ESWL in the management of refractory symptomatic main pancreatic duct stones.MethodsThis is an open-label, multi-center, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and main pancreatic duct stones ≥5 mm who fail standard ERP methods for stone removal will be eligible for this study. In total, 150 subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either ESWL or POP. A maximum of 4 sessions of either ESWL or POP will be allowed in each arm, with crossover permitted thereafter. The primary outcome is complete stone clearance and secondary outcomes include quality of life, pain scores, number of interventions, and daily opiate requirements.ConclusionsThis study aims to answer the question of which lithotripsy method is superior in removing refractory pancreatic duct stones while addressing the effects of lithotripsy on quality of life and pain in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04115826). 相似文献
Summary Regenerating islets can be induced by the administration of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase inhibitors to 90% depancreatized rats. In screening a regenerating isletderived cDNA library, we previously isolated a novel gene, reg (regenerating gene), which encodes a 165-amino acid protein with a 21-amino acid signal sequence. In the present study, we have examined the expression and localization of reg protein in the regenerating islets by immunocytochemical techniques using a monoclonal antibody against a recombinant rat reg protein of 144 amino acids without the signal sequence. Light microscopy examination showed strong immunoreactivity for reg protein in the regenerating islets of the rats at two weeks and two months after the 90% pancreatectomy, whereas reg protein was almost undetectable in normal rat islets or in the islets of the rats one year after the pancreatectomy. Almost all the reg protein-positive cells were stained for insulin. By applying the immunogold technique at the ultrastructural level, it was demonstrated that both reg protein and insulin occur in the central granular core of the regenerating Beta cell secretory granules. These results suggest that reg protein is synthesized in and secreted from the regenerating Beta cells and that its expression is closely associated with Beta-cell regeneration. 相似文献