Background and Objectives The literature contains little on the prevalence and causes of high predonation haemoglobin levels among blood donors. This study aimed to characterize and develop an algorithm to manage would‐be donors with polycythaemia. Materials and Methods Between November 2009 and November 2011, we offered haematology consultations to blood donors with repeated haemoglobin concentration (Hb) above the WHO limit for polycythaemia vera (PV) (10·2 and 11·5 mm /16·5 and 18·5 g/dl for women and men, respectively). Investigation of such donors included Hb, haematocrit, mean cell volume, erythropoietin, ferritin, platelet count and leucocyte count, JAK2 V617 and JAK2 exon12 analysis, as well as other routine measurements. Results Among 46 such donors, 39 had a history of smoking, which contributes to erythrocytosis. Two had PV, five had severe hypertension, one of them because of renal artery stenosis, and two had diabetes mellitus. Thus, we found a high morbidity among such donors. Of the 36 others, 30 donated again before May 2012, at which time the Hb was significantly lower. Conclusion We recommend JAK2 V617 and JAK2 exon12 screening and clinical investigation for donors with concurrently high Hb, high haematocrit and iron deficiency. We also recommend that they stop or cut down on smoking to reduce the risk of thrombosis in general. We disqualified 10 of the donors. 相似文献
BackgroundExisting high-risk factors are insufficient to accurately predict the postoperative recurrence risk of stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). The discovery of additional prognostic markers may be the key to improving the current status of stage II CRC treatment. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship among desmoplastic reaction (DR), tumor budding (TBd), the tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) and their prognostic value for relapse-free survival (RFS).MethodsIn this study, 207 patients with histologically confirmed stage II CRC from January 2012 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed from a single center; the cohort was divided into subgroups based on low or high TSR, and low, intermediate or high DR and TBd. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis and log-rank test were applied to examine RFS among subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to identify independent factors associated with RFS, and a nomogram was subsequently developed.ResultsAbnormal CA242, CEA, T4 stage, presence of hypertension, internal obstruction or perforation (IOP), lymphovascular or/and perineural invasion (PNI), number of nodes examined less than 12, low-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-L), higher Ki-67 and immature DR were associated with a lower RFS. In multivariable analysis, DR (HR =2.111; 95% CI: 1.184–3.766; P=0.011), LVI (HR =1.919; 95% CI: 1.004–3.669; P=0.049) and PNI (HR =2.724; 95% CI: 1.362–5.448; P=0.005) were prognostic factors for RFS. On this basis, a nomogram that integrated DR and clinicopathologic predictors for predicting RFS passed the calibration and had an area under the curve of 0.826.ConclusionsThe prognostic significance of DR outperformed TBd and TSR, therefore, we recommend adding DR as a biomarker in routine pathological reports. The novel nomogram combining these factors may be used as a reliable and effective tool for the prediction of RFS in stage II CRC, thus helping optimize therapeutic regimens under cooperation of oncologists and surgeons. Further multicentric studies are required for validation of this novel, simple and cost-effective prognostic model. 相似文献
We applied two propensity score-based analyses to simultaneously compare three treatment modalities—stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), lobectomy, or sublobar resection (SLR)—for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the aim of clarifying the average treatment effect (ATE) and formulating a risk-adapted approach to treatment selection. A retrospective review of 823 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent SBRT, lobectomy, or SLR for stage I NSCLC was conducted. The following two analyses using machine learning-based propensity scores were performed: (i) propensity score weighting (PSW) to assess the ATE in the entire cohort, and (ii) propensity score subclassification (PSS) to evaluate treatment effects of subgroups. PSW showed no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) between SBRT and SLR (60.0% vs 61.2%; P = 0.70) and significant difference between SBRT and lobectomy (60.0% vs 77.6%; P = 0.026). Local (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) rates were significantly lower in lobectomy than in SBRT, whereas there was no significant difference between SBRT and SLR. PSS identified four subgroups with different patient characteristics: lobectomy-oriented (5-year cumulative incidences of non-lung cancer death, 7.5%), SLR-oriented (14.2%), SBRT-oriented (23.8%) and treatment-neutral subgroups (16.1%). Each subgroup showed different survival trends regarding the three treatments. The ATE of SBRT was not significantly different from that of SLR, but it was inferior to lobectomy. Four subgroups with different risks of non-lung cancer death and different survival trends for each treatment were identified. These would help decision-making for patients with stage I NSCLC. 相似文献