循证护理在中心静脉置管住院血透患者中的应用

目的:运用循证护理解决中心静脉置管并发症患者的临床总结。方法:对165例行中心静脉置管的血液透析患者按入院时间先后分为非循证组和循证组,非循证组68例患者采用常规护理方法,循证组77例患者采用循证护理方法。结果:循证组患者置管后并发症发生率低于非循证组(P<0.05)。结论:运用循证护理理论指导临床护理实践能提高护理质量。     

Accuracy of the London Atlas,Haavikko’s Method and Cameriere’s European Formula of dental age estimation in Turkish children

Age estimation is a mandatory procedure when the chronological age is unknown or uncertain. Dental development is the preferred characteristic for estimating a child's age. There are many methods for dental age estimation, but their reliability can differ between populations. This study compared the accuracy of three of these methods—the London Atlas (LA), Haavikko's method (HM), and Cameriere's European formula (CF)—in Turkish children living in northwestern Turkey. Panoramic radiographs of 980 children from northwestern Turkey aged between 6.00 and 14.99 years were examined for the whole study group and separately for different ages and sexes by all three methods. Statistical differences between chronological age and dental age were tested using the paired sample t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The LA, HM, and CF accuracies were determined based on the mean absolute error. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed that the correlation between chronological age and dental age for both sexes was linear for all methods. The LA overestimated the chronological age by 0.09 years, while HM and CF underestimated it by 0.49 and 0.11 years, respectively. The difference between dental age and chronological age was significant in all samples, for all methods, except for the LA in boys. When boys, girls, and the total sample were evaluated, values with the lowest mean absolute error were obtained by HM and were statistically significant in all three groups. Therefore, HM is more accurate than the LA and CF for dental age estimation in Turkish children living in northwestern Turkey.     

Long-term treatment costs and cost-effectiveness of restoration repair versus replacement

ObjectivesWhen managing partially defective restorations, dentists can choose between repair and replacement. We aimed to assess the long-term treatment costs of repairs and replacements.MethodsPartially defective anterior and posterior composite restorations in permanent teeth had been repaired or replaced in a German university hospital and were retrospectively followed until censoring or one of the following events: (1) Extraction, (2) Major complications including placement of indirect restorations, endodontic treatments and extractions, or (3) Any complications including major complications and further direct restorations. Costs were estimated from a German mixed public-private-payer perspective. Cost-effectiveness differences were described using median-based incremental-cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER_MEDIAN). Statistical analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed modeling (GLM), Chi²-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p < 0.05).ResultsA total of 616 repairs in 468 patients (follow-up: 4.9 ± 4.1 years) and 264 replacements in 218 patients (follow-up: 4.8 ± 4.3) were included. While replacements were associated with higher initial treatment costs, median annualized treatment costs did not significantly differ between repair (47.58 Euro [IQR: 24.41–107.04]) and replacement (50.64 Euro [IQR: 26.30–118.78]; p > 0.05), but were higher for molars (75.53 Euro [IQR: 24.41–92.18]) than incisors (45.03 Euro [IQR: 28.19–168.50]; p = 0.011). The difference in the % of extractions, major and any complications were minimal between both groups. The mean ICER_MEDIAN of replacement vs. repair was -146.8 Euro/% when extractions were considered as outcomes. Regarding major and any complications, mean ICER_MEDIAN amounted to 67.6 Euro/% and 23.9 Euro/%, respectively.SignificanceRepairs and replacements of partially defective restorations showed similar long-term costs and cost-effectiveness.     

Adhesion to high-performance polymers applied in dentistry: A systematic review

ObjectiveThe aim of this systemic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement, was to investigate the impact of surface pretreatments on the bonding strength of high performance polymers (HPPs).MethodsEight databases were searched through March 2019. Risk of bias was assessed and random effects meta-analyses were applied to analyze mean differences in shear bond strength (SBS) and tensile bond strength (TBS), considering surface pretreatments and bonding agents after 24h and thermocycling.ResultsA total of 235 relevant titles and abstracts were found, yielding 11 final selections. Low risk of bias was observed in most studies. For polyetheretherketone (PEEK) specimens, random-effect models showed that, compared to non-treated controls, pretreatments associated with Visio.link® (Bredent, Senden, GE) increased TBS by 26.72 MPa (95% confidence interval (CI), 19.69–33.76; p < 0.00001) and increased SBS by 4.86 MPa (95% CI, 2.61–7.10; p < 0.00001). Air abrasion improved SBS by 4.90 MPa (95% CI, 3.90–5.90; p < 0.00001) (50 μm alumina) and 4.51 MPa (95% CI, 1.85–7.18; p = 0.0009) (silica-coated CoJet). In comparison to non-treated controls, Visio.link® and Signum PEEK Bond® (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, GE) increased SBS by 33.76 MPa (95% CI, 18.72–48.81; p < 0.00001) and 33.28 MPa (95% CI, 17.48–49.07; p < 0.00001), respectively. No differences were found between Visio.link® and Signum PEEK Bond® or Monobond Plus/Heliobond® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, LH) (p > 0.05). Similar results were observed for polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) specimens.SignificanceThis review shows improved HPP bonding following the application of various surface pretreatments, including air abrasion and bonding agents.     

An electronic oral health record to document,plan and educate

The University of British Columbia (UBC) in collaboration with a software developer (Planmeca Oy, Finland) created an electronic oral health record based on the principles of cognitive ergonomics rooted in the European research and development project ‘ORQUEST’ to guide students through medical, dental, social histories, examinations, treatment planning and progress notes. Clinicians in each dental specialty of the Faculty of Dentistry and software engineers cooperated to define the clinical content and workflow of clinical procedures in three phases: (i) development of a radiographic module, (ii) development of medical, dental, social and family histories, intra‐ and extra‐oral examinations, progress notes and treatment planning and (iii) development of the orthodontic section accompanied by an optimisation phase to correct technical problems and clinical content issues. From a practical perspective, this EOHR enhances the clinical performance of students and the quality assurance capacity of the institution. It facilitates audits of clinical productivity and research, and it can be modified with relative ease to suit similar educational and clinical environments in either public or private healthcare settings.