排序方式: 共有43条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
41.
Mabuchi S Okazawa M Isohashi F Ohta Y Maruoka S Yoshioka Y Enomoto T Morishige K Kamiura S Kimura T 《Gynecologic oncology》2011,120(1):94-100
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with that of extended-field irradiation (EFRT) in patients with FIGO Stage IA2-IIb cervical cancer with multiple pelvic lymph node metastases.Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with FIGO Stage IA2-IIb cervical cancer who had undergone radical surgery between April 1997 and March 2008. Of these, 55 patients who demonstrated multiple pelvic lymph node metastases were treated postoperatively with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy (n = 29) or EFRT (n = 26). Thirty-six patients with single pelvic node metastasis were also treated postoperatively with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy. The recurrence rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the treatment groups.Results
Pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy was significantly superior to EFRT with regard to recurrence rate (37.9% vs 69.2%, p = 0.0306), PFS (log-rank, p = 0.0236), and OS (log-rank, p = 0.0279). When the patients were treated with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the patients with multiple lymph node metastases and those with single node metastases. With regards to grade 3-4 acute or late toxicities, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups.Conclusions
Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is superior to EFRT for treating patients with FIGO Stage IA2-IIb cervical cancer displaying multiple pelvic lymph node metastases. 相似文献42.
目的 评价同步放化疗(CCRT)与序贯放化疗(SCRT)治疗食管癌的远期疗效.方法 计算机检索The Cochrane Library、Pubmed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普中文科技期全文数据库(VIP)和万方数据库,对符合纳入标准的随机对照试验进行方法学质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入22个研究1933例患者,结果显示,同步放化疗组1年生存率、2年生存率、3年生存率、1年疾病局部控制率、2年疾病局部控制率、3年疾病局部控制率[OR=2.41,95%CI(1.48,3.91),P=0.0004]优于序贯放化疗组,在远处转移方面,两组无差别.结论 同步放化疗治疗食管癌的1、2、3年生存率,1、2、3、年局部局部控制率优于序贯放化疗,但受纳入研究的质量的影响,上述结论尚需更多高质量的临床试验来进一步证实. 相似文献
43.
Maayan Abargil Hadas Wiseman Refael Yonatan-Leus Orya Tishby 《Journal of clinical psychology》2023,79(10):2422-2438